JB/013/223/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/013/223/001: Difference between revisions

Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<!-- Format from "number of judges" -->
<head>1820 Sept. 13</head>
<head>1820 Sept. 13</head>


Line 34: Line 33:
the Roman law it is a principle that the probability of<lb/>
the Roman law it is a principle that the probability of<lb/>
good judicature is <del><hi rend="underline">directly</hi></del> <add>in the direct ratio of</add> the number of the judges in<lb/>
good judicature is <del><hi rend="underline">directly</hi></del> <add>in the direct ratio of</add> the number of the judges in<lb/>
each judicature: yes, and likewise so say I, with no other alteration than the<lb/>
each judicature: <add>yes, and <del>likewise</del></add> so say I, with no other alteration than the<lb/>
substituting to the word direct the word inverse the reason<lb/>
substituting to the word <hi rend="underline">direct</hi> the word <hi rend="underline">inverse</hi> this reason<lb/>
is that applies <gap/> not only to this class of functionaries, not only of this class <gap/><lb/>
<del>is that</del> applies <del><gap/></del> <add>not only to this class of</add> functionaries, <del>not only of this class <add><gap/></add></del><lb/>
but (with very few exceptions, grounded in any particular reason)<lb/>
but (with very few exceptions, grounded in <add><unclear>any</unclear></add> particular reason)<lb/>
to every other: it is that supposing the <gap/><lb/>
to every other: it is that <del>supposing the <gap/></del><lb/>
in proportion of the ratio of the number added to one number,<lb/>
in <del>proportion of</del> the ratio of the number added to <hi rend="underline">one</hi> <add>number</add>,<lb/>
responsibility under the <gap/> salutarity-restraining principle of <gap/><lb/>
<hi rend="underline">responsibility</hi> under the <del><gap/></del> <add>salutarity-</add>restraining <del>principle of <gap/></del><lb/>
anticipation of it, are diminished.[+]2<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">anticipation</hi> of it, are diminished.<hi rend="superscript">[+]2</hi><lb/>
<note>[+]2 But if this responsibility,<lb/>
<note>[+]2 But if this responsibility,<lb/>
and as the system<lb/>
and as the system<lb/>
of compleatly secret judication the<lb/>
of <add><sic>compleatly</sic></add> <hi rend="underline">secret</hi> judication the<lb/>
salutarity-restraining<lb/>
salutarity-restraining<lb/>
<gap/> force is next to nothing<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> <add>force</add> is next to nothing<lb/>
under this system of compleatly public<lb/>
<add>under this system</add> of <sic>compleatly</sic> <hi rend="underline">public</hi><lb/>
judication, is on any<lb/>
judication, <unclear>as on any</unclear><lb/>
plan, it is at its maximum.<lb/>
plan, it is at its <hi rend="underline">maximum</hi>.<lb/>
Though, in<lb/>
Though, in<lb/>
some cases Appeal<lb/>
some cases Appeal<lb/>
may upon the whole be advisable, upon<lb/>
may <add>upon the whole</add> be advisable, <del>upon<lb/>
the whole yet, rather<lb/>
the whole</del> yet, rather<lb/>
than have appeal without<lb/>
than have <hi rend="underline">appeal without<lb/>
publicity in all<lb/>
publicity</hi> in all<lb/>
cases, I would have<lb/>
cases, I would have<lb/>
publicity without<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">publicity without<lb/>
appeal in all cases.<lb/>
appeal</hi> in all cases.<lb/>
By From the <gap/> uniform tenor<lb/>
<del>By</del> <add>From</add> the <del><gap/></del> <add>uniform</add> tenor<lb/>
of experience in this<lb/>
of experience in <hi rend="underline">this</hi><lb/>
country, what is above<lb/>
country, what is above<lb/>
has received the fullest<lb/>
has received the fullest<lb/>
confirmation. All this<lb/>
confirmation. <del>All this<lb/>
is fully discussed In the<lb/>
is fully discussed</del> In the<lb/>
books that accompany<lb/>
books that accompany<lb/>
this <gap/> tedious<lb/>
this <del><gap/></del> tedious<lb/>
letter, all this you<lb/>
letter, all this you<lb/>
would find fully discussed.</note>
would find fully discussed.</note>
Line 73: Line 72:
I see continually, and I doubt not justly cried out against among you: in this state of judication behold the all-sufficient cause of it.</note>
I see continually, and I doubt not justly cried out against among you: in this state of judication behold the all-sufficient cause of it.</note>


<p><gap/> <gap/><lb/>
<p><del><gap/> <add><gap/></add><lb/>
<gap/><lb/>
<gap/><lb/>
<gap/><lb/>
<gap/><lb/>
<gap/><lb/>
<gap/></del><lb/>
Known and provable traitors to the country remain still unpunished.<lb/>
Known and provable traitors to the country remain still unpunished.<lb/>
<gap/><lb/>
<del><gap/><</del>lb/>
In Spain Spain under the subsisting regime judicature<lb/>
In <del>Spain</del> Spain under the subsisting regime judicature<lb/>
<gap/><lb/>
<del><gap/></del><lb/>
can not naturally be expected to be much more prompt than<lb/>
can not naturally be expected to be much more prompt than<lb/>
<gap/><lb/>
<del><gap/><lb/>
<gap/> under the ancien regime France was. IN French France, according to a computation<lb/>
<gap/></del> <add>under the <foreign><hi rend="underline">ancien</hi> regime</foreign> France was.</add> In <del>French</del> France, according to a computation<lb/>
I <gap/> once made, 6 years was <gap/> the average duration of <gap/><lb/>
I <del><gap/></del> <add>once</add> made, 6 years was <del><gap/></del> the average duration of <del><gap/></del><lb/>
a criminal cause, according to the report given of criminal<lb/>
a criminal cause, according to the report given of criminal<lb/>
causes, in the Causes litibres: not the maximum, but the<lb/>
causes, in the <hi rend="underline"><foreign>Causes litibres</foreign></hi>: not the <hi rend="underline">maximum</hi>, but the<lb/>
average. Yes, Unless you have discernment and energy enough to<lb/>
average. <add>Yes,</add> Unless you have discernment and energy enough to<lb/>
rid yourselves of <gap/> <gap/> it substituting<lb/>
rid yourselves of <del><gap/> <add><gap/></add></del> <add>it</add> substituting<lb/>
to it a natural system, having for its object the ends of justice<lb/>
to it a <hi rend="underline">natural</hi> system, having for its object the ends of justice<lb/>
pure <gap/> <gap/> despotism must as the lesser evil must and will be substituted to the system<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> <add>pure</add> <gap/> despotism <del>must</del> as the lesser evil must and will be substituted to the system<lb/>
that you have.</p>
which you have.</p>





Revision as of 09:07, 30 July 2023

Click Here To Edit

1820 Sept. 13

+ 10
Letter 1.

Now for an example. In Spain like as in other countries, they that
have taken their system of law from the Roman, Judges have
place in swarms with less numerous nor less mischievous,
than those of unlicenced depredators.[+]
[+]1 The Constitution has
with admirable
discernment and
public spirit, has
added the
Judicatory
of natural procedure
the judicatories without
lawyers, or of lawyers
without fees — the Reconciliation
Judicatories.
But these of Technical procedure
remain as yet tracted.

Hence
in the official part of the fraternity, not to speak of the
professional, judicatories, in stages of one above another
with appeal from the inferior to the level above: and in each
stage, judges in as great a number as it is supposed means,
can be found to pay for: for, under
the Roman law it is a principle that the probability of
good judicature is directly in the direct ratio of the number of the judges in
each judicature: yes, and likewise so say I, with no other alteration than the
substituting to the word direct the word inverse this reason
is that applies not only to this class of functionaries, not only of this class
but (with very few exceptions, grounded in any particular reason)
to every other: it is that supposing the
in proportion of the ratio of the number added to one number,
responsibility under the salutarity-restraining principle of
anticipation of it, are diminished.[+]2
[+]2 But if this responsibility,
and as the system
of compleatly secret judication the
salutarity-restraining
force is next to nothing
under this system of compleatly public
judication, as on any
plan, it is at its maximum.
Though, in
some cases Appeal
may upon the whole be advisable, upon
the whole
yet, rather
than have appeal without
publicity
in all
cases, I would have
publicity without
appeal
in all cases.
By From the uniform tenor
of experience in this
country, what is above
has received the fullest
confirmation. All this
is fully discussed
In the
books that accompany
this tedious
letter, all this you
would find fully discussed.

Now as to one evil which
I see continually, and I doubt not justly cried out against among you: in this state of judication behold the all-sufficient cause of it.





Known and provable traitors to the country remain still unpunished.
<lb/> In Spain Spain under the subsisting regime judicature

can not naturally be expected to be much more prompt than

under the ancien regime France was. In French France, according to a computation
I once made, 6 years was the average duration of
a criminal cause, according to the report given of criminal
causes, in the Causes litibres: not the maximum, but the
average. Yes, Unless you have discernment and energy enough to
rid yourselves of it substituting
to it a natural system, having for its object the ends of justice
pure despotism must as the lesser evil must and will be substituted to the system
which you have.





Identifier: | JB/013/223/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 13.

Date_1

1820-09-13

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

013

Main Headings

Folio number

223

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

jeremy bentham

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d10

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

draft of letter 2689, vol. 10

ID Number

4672

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in