JB/081/236/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/081/236/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1829 May 23<lb/>Petitions</head> <!-- some in pencil --> <p><note>1<hi rend="superscript">o</hi><lb/>Supplement</note><lb/>(10 <note>&sect;.11 Elucidations<lb/>>&sect;. Reconciliative Court<lb/>II Opinion-giving benefit</note></p> <p>&#9758; 28 May <foreign>Quere</foreign> if not employed?</p> <p><note>18<lb/>It is a complicated<lb/>machine for giving a<lb/>law opinion: <del><gap/></del> a<lb/>Analogue machine<lb/>1. <sic>.N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> of Lords for applying<lb/>things <hi rend="underline">veto</hi> to laws<lb/>Jury (Petty) for applying<lb/>people's <hi rend="underline">veto</hi> to <del>individual</del><lb/>&#x2014; application of laws<lb/>to individual cases</note></p> <p>Now for a <gap/> or two.  <hi rend="underline">Veto</hi> in a law &#x2014; <sic>antecedently</sic><lb/>to it becoming suit &#x2014; veto in the application of it to this or that individual<lb/>case: <add>to if the</add> complicated instruments employed for this has<lb/>purpose the attention of the render law already been directed.<lb/>The <del>House n</del> power of the House of Lords, an <gap/> <gap/><lb/>for covering from <del>the</del> public observation <add>the <gap/></add> oft producing the effect<lb/>of a Legal negater &#x2014; <foreign><hi rend="underline">le Roi j'avisire</hi>: <add>Of</add> this <gap/> the <add><gap/> inclination</add><lb/>attention has for some time been painted by other hands.  The power<lb/>f the Jury will it <gap/> numbers a machine for applying a <hi rend="underline">veto</hi><lb/>on the part of the people to the exercise of the power of the Jury when<lb/>applied to the purpose of inflicting punishment for <del><gap/></del><lb/>this or that individual act of delinquency how clearly so ever<lb/>proved.</p> <p>A piece of machinery not less complicated may be<lb/>pronounced this same <sic>Reconciliative</sic> Tribunal &#x2014; a machine for giving<lb/>by authority a <hi rend="underline">directive opinion</hi> in relation to a law case:<lb/><add>and the curious circumstance is &#x2014; that it is by Non-lawyers that in<lb/>this case the opposite is formed and delivered.</add></p> <p>Vast as <del>the</del> laggards know to their cost is the amount<lb/>of the opinion trash carried on in England by the fraternity of<lb/>the <del>la</del> learned: what would they say were it taken out of their<lb/>hands?  So would it be, according to the extent given to it in the<lb/>logical field of <add>service in</add> law and legislation were a <add>set of</add> <sic>Reconciliative</sic> Courts<lb/>established in England, Scotland and Ireland.  <gap/> from<lb/><gap/> are <gap/> these</p> <p>1. The services were obtained at such vast <sic>expence</sic>, obtained<lb/>in the supposition <gap/><lb/>2. <del>the advice given <gap/></del> Clear of all proposed <sic>deceptiousness</sic><lb/><del>the advice given</del> will in the ordinary state of things be the<lb/>advice given:  extraordinary any case in which any sort<lb/>deception has place.  Why?  because, <gap/> <gap/> casual<lb/>cause of corruption, <del>by an</del> to the action of no sinister interest<lb/>will the Member of that <gap/> stand exposed: ordinary on the<lb/>contrary the case in which, in the course of the opinion trade<lb/>such deception has place.  Why? because in this case to the<lb/>actor of sinister interest in a thousand diversified shapes are <add>do</add> these<lb/>living out long <gap/> <gap/> these walking tabernacles of law learning<lb/><add>at</add><lb/><!-- continues in the margin --> <add>at</add> all <del><gap/></del> times stand<lb/>exposed: advice to constitute <add>or <gap/></add> a suit without<lb/>right. Advice to employ<lb/>in pursuit <gap/> <gap/><lb/>remedy <del><gap/> <gap/></del> with<lb/>defendants <gap/> an <gap/><lb/>constraint of<lb/><!-- continues along the edge of the page --> <gap/>: an either-<gap/> <gap/> <gap/> instead of a less dilatory and expensive operation as instruments</p>  
<head>1829 May 23<lb/>Petitions</head> <!-- some in pencil --> <p><note>1<hi rend="superscript">o</hi><lb/>Supplement</note><lb/>(10 <note>&sect;.11 Elucidations<lb/>&sect;. <sic>Reconciliative</sic> Court<lb/>II Opinion-giving benefit</note></p> <p>&#9758; 28 May <foreign>Quere</foreign> if not employed?</p> <p><note>18<lb/>It is a complicated<lb/>machine for giving a<lb/>law opinion: <del><gap/></del> a<lb/>Analogue machine<lb/>1. <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> of Lords for applying<lb/>King's <hi rend="underline">veto</hi> to laws<lb/>2. Jury (Petty) for applying<lb/>people's <hi rend="underline">veto</hi> to <del>individual</del><lb/>application of laws<lb/>to individual cases</note></p> <p>Now for a <gap/> or two.  <hi rend="underline">Veto</hi> in a law &#x2014; <sic>antecedently</sic><lb/>to it becoming suit &#x2014; veto in the application of it to this or that individual<lb/>case: <add><unclear>to of</unclear> the</add> complicated instruments employed for these two<lb/>purposes the attention of the reader has already been directed.<lb/>The <del>House n</del> power of the House of Lords, a complicated medium<lb/>for covering from <del>the</del> public observation <add>the operation</add> oft producing the effect<lb/>of a Legal negater &#x2014; <foreign><hi rend="underline">le Roi s'<unclear>avisire</unclear></hi>:</foreign> <add>Of</add> this <gap/> the <add><gap/> <gap/></add><lb/>attention has for some time been painted by other hands.  The power<lb/>of the Jury with its twelve numbers a machine for applying a <hi rend="underline">veto</hi><lb/>on the part of the people to the exercise of the power of the Judge when<lb/>applied to the purpose of inflicting punishment for <del><gap/></del><lb/>this or that individual act of delinquency how clearly so ever<lb/>proved.</p> <p>A piece of machinery not less complicated may be<lb/>pronounced this same <sic>Reconciliative</sic> Tribunal &#x2014; a machine for giving<lb/>by authority a <hi rend="underline">directive opinion</hi> in relation to a law case:<lb/><add>and the curious circumstance is &#x2014; that it is by Non-lawyers that in<lb/>this case the opposition is formed and delivered.</add></p> <p>Vast as <del>the</del> laggards know to their cost is the amount<lb/>of the opinion trash carried on in England by the fraternity of<lb/>the <del>la</del> learned: what would they say were it taken out of their<lb/>hands?  So would it be, according to the extent given to it in the<lb/>logical field of <add>service in</add> law and legislation were a <add>set of</add> <sic>Reconciliative</sic> Courts<lb/>established in England, Scotland and Ireland.  <gap/> from<lb/><gap/> are <gap/> these</p> <p>1. The services were obtained at such vast <sic>expence</sic>, obtained<lb/>in the supposition <foreign>gratis</foreign><lb/>2. <del>The advice given <gap/></del> Clear of all proposed <sic>deceptiousness</sic><lb/><del>the advice given</del> will in the ordinary state of things be the<lb/>advice given:  extraordinary any case in which any such<lb/>deception has place.  Why?  because, <gap/> <gap/> casual<lb/>cause of corruption, <del>by an</del> to the action of no sinister interest<lb/>will the Member of that <gap/> stand exposed: ordinary on the<lb/>contrary the case in which, in the course of the opinion trade<lb/>such deception has place.  Why? because in this case to the<lb/>actor of sinister interest in a thousand diversified shapes are <add>do</add> those<lb/>living out long <gap/> <gap/> these walking tabernacles of law learning<lb/><add>at</add><lb/><!-- continues in the margin --> <add>at</add> all <del><gap/></del> times stand<lb/>exposed: advice to constitute <lb/><add>or defeat</add> a suit without<lb/>right. advice to employ<lb/>in pursuit one <gap/><lb/>remedy <del><gap/> <gap/></del> will<lb/>defendants order an <gap/><lb/>instrument of<lb/><!-- continues along the edge of the page --> defence: an either-<gap/> or more instead of a less dilatory and expensive operation as instruments</p>  





Revision as of 13:37, 12 August 2023

Click Here To Edit

1829 May 23
Petitions

1o
Supplement

(10 §.11 Elucidations
§. Reconciliative Court
II Opinion-giving benefit

☞ 28 May Quere if not employed?

18
It is a complicated
machine for giving a
law opinion: a
Analogue machine
1. No of Lords for applying
King's veto to laws
2. Jury (Petty) for applying
people's veto to individual
application of laws
to individual cases

Now for a or two. Veto in a law — antecedently
to it becoming suit — veto in the application of it to this or that individual
case: to of the complicated instruments employed for these two
purposes the attention of the reader has already been directed.
The House n power of the House of Lords, a complicated medium
for covering from the public observation the operation oft producing the effect
of a Legal negater — le Roi s'avisire: Of this the
attention has for some time been painted by other hands. The power
of the Jury with its twelve numbers a machine for applying a veto
on the part of the people to the exercise of the power of the Judge when
applied to the purpose of inflicting punishment for
this or that individual act of delinquency how clearly so ever
proved.

A piece of machinery not less complicated may be
pronounced this same Reconciliative Tribunal — a machine for giving
by authority a directive opinion in relation to a law case:
and the curious circumstance is — that it is by Non-lawyers that in
this case the opposition is formed and delivered.

Vast as the laggards know to their cost is the amount
of the opinion trash carried on in England by the fraternity of
the la learned: what would they say were it taken out of their
hands? So would it be, according to the extent given to it in the
logical field of service in law and legislation were a set of Reconciliative Courts
established in England, Scotland and Ireland. from
are these

1. The services were obtained at such vast expence, obtained
in the supposition gratis
2. The advice given Clear of all proposed deceptiousness
the advice given will in the ordinary state of things be the
advice given: extraordinary any case in which any such
deception has place. Why? because, casual
cause of corruption, by an to the action of no sinister interest
will the Member of that stand exposed: ordinary on the
contrary the case in which, in the course of the opinion trade
such deception has place. Why? because in this case to the
actor of sinister interest in a thousand diversified shapes are do those
living out long these walking tabernacles of law learning
at
at all times stand
exposed: advice to constitute
or defeat a suit without
right. advice to employ
in pursuit one
remedy will
defendants order an
instrument of
defence: an either- or more instead of a less dilatory and expensive operation as instruments




Identifier: | JB/081/236/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.

Date_1

1829-05-26

Marginal Summary Numbering

[[marginal_summary_numbering::18[?]]]

Box

081

Main Headings

petition for justice

Folio number

236

Info in main headings field

petitions

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e10

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

b&m 1829

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1829

Notes public

[[notes_public::"28 may quere if not employed?" [note in bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

26023

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in