JB/004/125/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/004/125/001: Difference between revisions

Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


1830. Augt. 1.
<head>1830. Aug<hi rend="superscript">t</hi>. 1.<lb/>
Review.
Review.</head>


Note a 1 2 p
<note>Note a 1 2 p</note>


Well then in the grant of the same Stature 22 G.2. suppose this same Master S<gap/> prosecuted suppose say
<p>Well then <add>in the grant of the same Stature 22 G.2.</add> suppose this same Master <unclear>Stratford</unclear> prosecuted suppose <add>say</add><lb/>
at the Old Bailey before Mr <gap/> of the Cell of London
at the Old Bailey before M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> R<gap/> of the City of London<lb/>
and his <gap/> <gap/>: a supposition which <gap/> argucadi
and his <gap/> <gap/>: a supposition which <del><gap/></del> <hi rend="underline"><foreign>argucado</foreign></hi><lb/>
we have as <gap/> good a right to make as that of the <gap/> of
we have as <del><gap/></del> good a right to make as that of the <unclear>falling</unclear> of<lb/>
the sky. Suppose moreover, this fact clearly proved by teh testimony
the sky. Suppose moreover, this fact clearly proved by the testimony<lb/>
of the Solicitor by whom to said <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> under the name of
of the Solicitor by whom to said <del><gap/></del> <gap/> <del><gap/></del> <unclear>under the name</unclear> of<lb/>
a few, said Master had been paid for said attentions. Suppose
a few, said Master had been paid for said attentions. Suppose<lb/>
this done then would Mr <gap/> have to say Gentlemen of the Jury you
this done then would M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> R<gap/> have to say Gentlemen of the Jury you<lb/>
have heard what the witness has been saying: if you believe him, it
have heard what the witness has been saying: if you believe him, it<lb/>
is my duty to say, that this act which the prisoner S<gap/>
is my duty to say, that this act which the prisoner Stratford<lb/>
has committed is of the number of those Acts which it was the intention
has committed is of the number of those Acts which it was the intention<lb/>
of the Act in question as far as possible to prevent, by giving to
of the Act in question as far as possible to prevent, by giving to<lb/>
them the genuine cha<gap/> of obtainment in false pretences, and
them the <unclear>genuine denomination</unclear> of obtainment on false pretences, and<lb/>
appointing for the punishment of all persons convicted of such offences
appointing for the punishment of all persons convicted of <del>such</del> offences<lb/>
of this same description <gap/> one or more of a variety of punishments
of this same description <del><gap/></del> one or more of a variety of punishments<lb/>
therein mentioned at the option of him or those to whom on <gap/> each such occasion
therein mentioned at the option of him or those to whom on <del><gap/></del> <add>each such</add> occasion<lb/>
as shall haave belonged to officiate in the character of Judge <gap/> or
it shall have belonged to officiate in the character of Judge <del><gap/></del> or<lb/>
Judges. On the present instance at the present day to the present instance
Judges. On the present instance at the present day to the present instance<lb/>
the choice will be between imprisonment, whipping and
the choice will be between imprisonment, whipping and<lb/>
transportation. Till of late years the pillory would have been of the
transportation. Till of late years the pillory would have been of the<lb/>
number: but having become out of fashion it was by the Act G.1
number: but having become out of fashion <unclear>it was</unclear> by the Act G.1<lb/>
<gap/> that punishment was done away with.
<gap/> that punishment was done away with.</p>


If the supporter of Mr R<gap/> be not regarded as
<p>If <del>the supporter of</del> Mr R<gap/> be not regarded as<lb/>
entirely <gap/> so apt a subject matter for the supposition as might have
<unclear>entirely</unclear> <del><gap/></del> so apt a subject matter for the supposition as might have<lb/>
been done, suppose our late Lord Chief Justice Lord <gap/>. When
been chosen, suppose our late Lord Chief Justice Lord <gap/>. When<lb/>
a man in office in the character of a defendant in a criminal suit it is
<del>a man in office</del> in the character of a defendant in a criminal suit it is<lb/>
a man in office that appears,
a man in office that appears, <del>soon to be <gap/></del> fully assured<lb/>
of being <gap/> with money as the justice of this Minister of Justice <add><gap/> of the law</add><lb/>
G<gap/> he may be supposed to say, if you believe the witness you<lb/>
will believe that the prisoner has committed <del>the</del> an act of that sort which<lb/>
the law in justice has to view or spoken of the obtainment of money under<lb/>
<add>false</add><lb/>
<note>false pretences. But on<lb/>
the present occasion as in<lb/>
others it is my duty to<lb/>
be <gap/> of the law:<lb/>
and in that quality<lb/>
I inform you that on<lb/>
this occasion what the law<lb/>
meant to require <unclear>as a condition</unclear> to conviction is &#x2014; that the act in question should have <unclear>proceeded from</unclear> corrupt <unclear>motives</unclear>. Now on this occasion you will recollect, that<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> by the witness in question <del><gap/></del> it was not stated that <gap/> from corrupt motives that the money was so obtained: which being the case a Verdict from you of <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi><lb/>
<hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> not quickly follows of course. Now<lb/>
unless it be his wish to be punished in<lb/>
for defamation in a criminal information<lb/>
would I recommend it to any <unclear>person</unclear> to impute any such motive to this <del>my</del> learned and so <del>highly<lb/>
injured</del> <gap/> <gap/> and largely injured gentleman.</note></p>





Revision as of 08:29, 17 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

1830. Augt. 1.
Review.

Note a 1 2 p

Well then in the grant of the same Stature 22 G.2. suppose this same Master Stratford prosecuted suppose say
at the Old Bailey before Mr R of the City of London
and his : a supposition which argucado
we have as good a right to make as that of the falling of
the sky. Suppose moreover, this fact clearly proved by the testimony
of the Solicitor by whom to said under the name of
a few, said Master had been paid for said attentions. Suppose
this done then would Mr R have to say Gentlemen of the Jury you
have heard what the witness has been saying: if you believe him, it
is my duty to say, that this act which the prisoner Stratford
has committed is of the number of those Acts which it was the intention
of the Act in question as far as possible to prevent, by giving to
them the genuine denomination of obtainment on false pretences, and
appointing for the punishment of all persons convicted of such offences
of this same description one or more of a variety of punishments
therein mentioned at the option of him or those to whom on each such occasion
it shall have belonged to officiate in the character of Judge or
Judges. On the present instance at the present day to the present instance
the choice will be between imprisonment, whipping and
transportation. Till of late years the pillory would have been of the
number: but having become out of fashion it was by the Act G.1
that punishment was done away with.

If the supporter of Mr R be not regarded as
entirely so apt a subject matter for the supposition as might have
been chosen, suppose our late Lord Chief Justice Lord . When
a man in office in the character of a defendant in a criminal suit it is
a man in office that appears, soon to be fully assured
of being with money as the justice of this Minister of Justice of the law
G he may be supposed to say, if you believe the witness you
will believe that the prisoner has committed the an act of that sort which
the law in justice has to view or spoken of the obtainment of money under
false
false pretences. But on
the present occasion as in
others it is my duty to
be of the law:
and in that quality
I inform you that on
this occasion what the law
meant to require as a condition to conviction is — that the act in question should have proceeded from corrupt motives. Now on this occasion you will recollect, that
by the witness in question it was not stated that from corrupt motives that the money was so obtained: which being the case a Verdict from you of [+]
[+] not quickly follows of course. Now
unless it be his wish to be punished in
for defamation in a criminal information
would I recommend it to any person to impute any such motive to this my learned and so highly
injured
and largely injured gentleman.




Identifier: | JB/004/125/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 4.

Date_1

1830-08-01

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

004

Main Headings

lord brougham displayed

Folio number

125

Info in main headings field

review

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

2046

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in