JB/096/209/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/209/001: Difference between revisions

JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 21: Line 21:
as those two sets of epithets are predicated of it cumulatively or disjunctively. 6<hi rend='superscript'>thly</hi> That<lb/>
as those two sets of epithets are predicated of it cumulatively or disjunctively. 6<hi rend='superscript'>thly</hi> That<lb/>
This Custom owe <sic>it's</sic> birth to one or other <add>in all</add> of the more violent passions of Fear, Lust, and<lb/>
This Custom owe <sic>it's</sic> birth to one or other <add>in all</add> of the more violent passions of Fear, Lust, and<lb/>
Anger. 7<hi rend='superscript'>thly</hi> &amp; lastly that these <del><gap/></del> <add>appetites</add> are opposite to the moral Sense.</p>  
Anger. 7<hi rend='superscript'>thly</hi> &amp; lastly that these <del><gap/></del> <add>appetites</add> are opposite to the moral Sense.</p>
 
<p>However frequent the expression may be in the declamatory <sic>stile</sic> &amp; in <note>the laxity of popular discourse</note> loose <unclear>discourse</unclear><lb/>
Custom to speak accurately, <add>any more than <gap/></add> &amp; if meant in the rigorous sense, intelligibly, can never <add>does nothing,</add><lb/>
be the cause of any thing <add>do any thing, nor be</add> &#x2014; The Custom of doing anything is the thing itself that is <add>often</add> <unclear>done</unclear><lb/>
nothing more <add>of which nothing more is</add> being <sic>consider'd</sic> in it than the very point of <sic>it's</sic> being <hi rend='underline'>often</hi> done, <del>&amp;</del> to say<lb/>
that <add>therefore</add> Custom does a thing is to say <add>in</add> that the thing does itself; and <add>or..</add> that Custom<lb/>
the cause of a thing", that a thing is a cause to itself <add><sic>it's</sic> own cause</add> &#x2014; <del>However true therefore</del><lb/>
<del>may be</del> It is <add>may be</add> true that this impression<del>s</del> of nature [if that is the name to be given<lb/>
exclusively to the love of offspring] are <del><gap/></del> erased <add>easier overcome</add> in a given instance after having<lb/>
been erased <add>overcome</add> in other instances before: but it is not true that <add>it was</add> Custom that erased it: for<lb/>
it could not be Custom that erased it the first time; &amp; as it could not the first time, it <gap/><lb/>
never &#x2014; It must have been therefore some thing else than custom; <add>viz:</add> as <hi rend='underline'>I say</hi>, this <add>difference of</add> perception,<lb/>
not that <hi rend='underline'>erased</hi> it but that outweighed it.<add>overbalanced it</add> And then the pleasure expected from the<lb/>
society <add>company</add> of the child being <del><add>app</add></del> a good, but the pain expected from either the <sic>labor</sic> or the<lb/>
expence or both of rearing it appearing <add>likely to be often</add> a greater good, outweighed the other; &amp; <del><gap/></del><lb/>
it is <del>to</del> <add>no</add> wonder this "strong instinctive affection xxxx was violated i:e: over-ruled without<lb/>
remorse &#x2014; as the <del><gap/></del> <add>striking</add> instances adduced in the <add>a</add> note <add>to the passage in question </add> fully prove <add>(sense fully to <unclear>evince</unclear>)</add> [it to have been.]</p>
   


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 23:03, 2 December 2011

Click Here To Edit

MOTIVES UNPERCEIVED — Exposition of Infants.

CHILD-MURDER.


---page break---

impressions of Nature, much stronger than those of the moral Sense, + + while yet known I should have thought had, by those in whose mouths the expression is found, had been made to include those impressions. we may learn
from that general practise, which prevailed in the most learned & polite
of the world, of exposing their Children, whereby the strong instinctive affction
of Parents for their offspring was violated without remorse."

In this passage these 7 propositions, if I mistake not are more or less explicitly contained —
1st That Custom has power to erase the strongest impressions of Nature:
that these impressions are stronger than, (& consequently distinct from) those of the Moral
Sense — 3dly That this Custom in particular had power to & did erase the an impression of
Nature. 4thly That this Custom is opposite to the Moral Sense. 5thly That this Custom
is either inhuman & unnatural, & perhaps that it is or inhuman & unnatural as well as whimsical and capricious
as those two sets of epithets are predicated of it cumulatively or disjunctively. 6thly That
This Custom owe it's birth to one or other in all of the more violent passions of Fear, Lust, and
Anger. 7thly & lastly that these appetites are opposite to the moral Sense.

However frequent the expression may be in the declamatory stile & in the laxity of popular discourse loose discourse
Custom to speak accurately, any more than & if meant in the rigorous sense, intelligibly, can never does nothing,
be the cause of any thing do any thing, nor be — The Custom of doing anything is the thing itself that is often done
nothing more of which nothing more is being consider'd in it than the very point of it's being often done, & to say
that therefore Custom does a thing is to say in that the thing does itself; and or.. that Custom
the cause of a thing", that a thing is a cause to itself it's own causeHowever true therefore
may be It is may be true that this impressions of nature [if that is the name to be given
exclusively to the love of offspring] are erased easier overcome in a given instance after having
been erased overcome in other instances before: but it is not true that it was Custom that erased it: for
it could not be Custom that erased it the first time; & as it could not the first time, it
never — It must have been therefore some thing else than custom; viz: as I say, this difference of perception,
not that erased it but that outweighed it.overbalanced it And then the pleasure expected from the
society company of the child being app a good, but the pain expected from either the labor or the
expence or both of rearing it appearing likely to be often a greater good, outweighed the other; &
it is to no wonder this "strong instinctive affection xxxx was violated i:e: over-ruled without
remorse — as the striking instances adduced in the a note to the passage in question fully prove (sense fully to evince) [it to have been.]



Identifier: | JB/096/209/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

legislation

Folio number

209

Info in main headings field

homicide of infants

Image

001

Titles

motives unperceived

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c9

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::j honig & zoonen [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

cc1

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31213

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in