★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
< | |||
(and we shall see hereafter that that benefit<lb/>is not small) results not from the deference<lb/>he himself pays to it, but from the deference <lb/> paid to it by other people. <del>As the</del> Is it compulsory?<lb/><del> | <head>Indirect</head> | ||
<p><note><gap/> <unclear>person</unclear>draft-making</note> -tory? this the traveller has not told us. How<lb/>it should have gained footing as a matter of <lb/>choice it is difficult to conceive for what motive<lb/> could have given birth to it? <del><gap/></del> what benefit a man may have from <lb/>it | |||
(and we shall see hereafter that that benefit<lb/>is not small) results not from the deference<lb/>he himself pays to it, but from the deference <lb/> paid to it by other people. <del>As the</del> Is it compulsory? <note>The extraordinary severity of the laws of the rigid evidence paid to them seems to render this improbable,as the deference paid to this custom seems not to <add>be clear</add> distribute of <gap/></note><lb/><del>This it could then | |||
</del> <add>This</add> one should <add>hardly think</add><lb/><gap/> it were, considering the severity of the laws<lb/>and the rigid uniform obedience that is paid<lb/>them; since it <add>seems not to be</add> not mentioned as obtaining <add>admitting</add><lb/><add>of no exception</add> universally without exception: perhaps the exception<lb/> if any may have been made in favour<lb/>of particular classes of persons, by the<lb/>law itself.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
Indirect
persondraft-making -tory? this the traveller has not told us. How
it should have gained footing as a matter of
choice it is difficult to conceive for what motive
could have given birth to it? what benefit a man may have from
it
(and we shall see hereafter that that benefit
is not small) results not from the deference
he himself pays to it, but from the deference
paid to it by other people. As the Is it compulsory? The extraordinary severity of the laws of the rigid evidence paid to them seems to render this improbable,as the deference paid to this custom seems not to be clear distribute of
This it could then
This one should hardly think
it were, considering the severity of the laws
and the rigid uniform obedience that is paid
them; since it seems not to be not mentioned as obtaining admitting
of no exception universally without exception: perhaps the exception
if any may have been made in favour
of particular classes of persons, by the
law itself.
|
Identifier: | JB/062/185/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 62. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
062 |
indirect legislation |
||
|
185 |
indirect |
||
|
002 |
|||
|
text sheet |
2 |
||
|
recto |
f9 / f10 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[britannia with shield emblem]]] |
||
|
20175 |
|||
