JB/050/142/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/050/142/001: Difference between revisions

Petergh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Petergh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
<note>The matter of expediency being settled, Pardon is an act of Justice, as much as Punishment. Pardoning is a branch of Justice the exercise of which cannot be governed by any certain rules</note></p>
<note>The matter of expediency being settled, Pardon is an act of Justice, as much as Punishment. Pardoning is a branch of Justice the exercise of which cannot be governed by any certain rules</note></p>


In the abstract as between the Sovereign &amp; <lb/>individual no certain rule can be established <add>collected</add>  
<p>In the abstract as between the Sovereign &amp; <lb/>individual no certain rule can be established <add>collected</add><lb/> concerning the preference <add>to adjust the  <unclear>preeminence</unclear></add> between <add>infliction</add> Punishment<lb/>&amp; <unclear>remission</unclear> <add>Pardon</add> - or if there can, it determines it<lb/>rather in favour of Punishment: for to carry <add>each</add><lb/>disposition to it's utmost: it is certain that to<lb/>punish <del>always</del> <add>in every case</add> is better than <add>in every case to</add> to pardon. <del>always</del></p> <pb/>


<note>Mercy which is correlative to Vengeance, I would be glad to see blotted out of the vocabulary of Jurisprudence. [though a noble] <add>however estimable an</add> ingredient in the character of a private person]</note>
<p>To punish or to pardon is according as the matters<lb/>of fact is settled, <add><gap/> of <unclear>future</unclear> are concluded &#x2014;</add> a duty; but as the <unclear>settle</unclear><lb/> it must belong to him on when the duty <gap/><lb/>hence it is that he <del>can</del> cannot be <gap/> in exercise of it by any <gap/> rules of <unclear>the</unclear><lb/><add>it</add> remains a matter not of perfect, but as it<lb/>called of imperfect obligation.</p>             




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 18:50, 28 December 2011



Click Here To Edit

CERTAINTY. Pardon.

Those who make clemency a matter of commendation
to a prince, & infer a merit from the naked
fact of his punishing seldom, never consider
that they must first make him a Tyrant in order to before they can
put him in a capacity to receive their
compliment — The exercising of the prerogative of pardon is can be justifiable only in 2 cases - either 1st when it can be done so that it will not without heighthening augmenting the presumption of impunity; or 2dly when though it is will seen that it must contribute to heighten that presumption, yet the case in question is such that the chance of mischief thereby done incurred is not equivalent to the actual misery which would be inflicted produced by the execution. It must immediately be seen, that the existance of matter of fact in the better case is incapable of can never be explicit verification: & hence it is dangerous to admitt this case at all. - As to the former case, the instances where it may takes place may be comprized under general rules. They must suppose him not
to regard the interests of society in the infliction
of his punishments, in which case, & in which case only, abstractedlying from the circumstances
of each particular case affair, it is a can be pronounced
commendable to make them cease — Whom Let us
they be taken away but suppose in any case that they the taking of them
away can be performed are not necessary for the without frustrating the
purpose of prosecution, the exercise of it is not a
Duty: a Duty the merit of fulfilling which is just as
great but no greater than as that of inflicting them
where they are.


---page break---

To Pardoning simply & in the abstract can be pronounced
a merit only in the dealings of individuals
with each other The matter of expediency being settled, Pardon is an act of Justice, as much as Punishment. Pardoning is a branch of Justice the exercise of which cannot be governed by any certain rules

In the abstract as between the Sovereign &
individual no certain rule can be established collected
concerning the preference to adjust the preeminence between infliction Punishment
& remission Pardon - or if there can, it determines it
rather in favour of Punishment: for to carry each
disposition to it's utmost: it is certain that to
punish always in every case is better than in every case to to pardon. always


---page break---

Mercy which is correlative to Vengeance, I would be glad to see blotted out of the vocabulary of Jurisprudence. [though a noble] however estimable an ingredient in the character of a private person]

To punish or to pardon is according as the matters
of fact is settled, of future are concluded — a duty; but as the settle
it must belong to him on when the duty
hence it is that he can cannot be in exercise of it by any rules of the
it remains a matter not of perfect, but as it
called of imperfect obligation.



Identifier: | JB/050/142/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

050

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

142

Info in main headings field

certainty pardon

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1 / f2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16133

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in