★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
1830 July 21 | <head>1830 July 21<lb/> | ||
Review | Review</head> | ||
§.6. Field of Review, logical | <note>§.6. Field of Review, logical<lb/> | ||
Chicanera | Chicanera<lb/> | ||
3. Legacia | 3. Legacia</note> | ||
13 | <note>13<lb/> | ||
< | Hundred, statement &<lb/> | ||
plaint used for the | plaint used for the<lb/> | ||
first application in | first application in<lb/> | ||
other | other cases <hi rend="underline">article</hi><lb/> | ||
by Chicanera | by Chicanera</note> | ||
Enter now Chicanera Legacia "Sisters! | <p>Enter now Chicanera Legacia "Sisters!<lb/> | ||
"Sisters!" (quoth she) you are both in the wrong. Statement | "Sisters!" (quoth she) you are both in the wrong. <hi rend="underline">Statement</hi><lb/> | ||
Plaint for the first paper, the Plaintiff given < | <hi rend="underline">Plaint</hi> for the first paper, the Plaintiff given in? No: they <add>those</add><lb/> | ||
names won't do, either of them. Article Citation is the sort of paper and the only sort | <add>names</add> won't do, either of them. <hi rend="underline">Article</hi> <add>Citation</add> is the sort of paper <add>and the only sort</add><lb/> | ||
my Plaintiffs Plaintiff shall <gap/> begin with giving in. [+] | my Plaintiffs <add>Plaintiff</add> shall <del><gap/></del> begin with giving in. <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi><lb/> | ||
<note>[+] Then again, as | <note><hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> Then again, as<lb/> | ||
to the paper first given | to the paper first given<lb/> | ||
in on the Defendants | in on the Defendants<lb/> | ||
side: <gap/> or a case | side: <del><gap/></del> or a case<lb/> | ||
where it is a Legacy | where it is a Legacy<lb/> | ||
that is in question | that is in question<lb/> | ||
would you have the | would you have the<lb/> | ||
paper called an | paper called an<lb/> | ||
Answer or a Plaint? | <hi rend="underline">Answer</hi> or a <hi rend="underline">Plaint</hi>?<lb/> | ||
Pooh! Pooh! they are | Pooh! Pooh! they are<lb/> | ||
not fit for the purpose | not fit for the purpose<lb/> | ||
those names either of | those names either of<lb/> | ||
them. Article is | them. Article is<lb/> | ||
in this case the proper | in this case the proper<lb/> | ||
word and the sole | word and the sole<lb/> | ||
one that is so. Article | one that is so. Article<lb/> | ||
is the name my | is the name my<lb/> | ||
Defendant shall give | Defendant shall give<lb/> | ||
to the paper of his, or | to the paper of his, or<lb/> | ||
it will be the worse | it will be the worse<lb/> | ||
for him — I have | for him — I have<lb/> | ||
Or<gap/> | Or<gap/><lb/> | ||
Bill and <add>the</add> Schedule</note><lb/> | |||
Bill and Schedule</note> | or if the plaint<lb/> | ||
or if the plaint | be more <unclear>to than last</unclear> <del>they</del> <add>he</add> may say Articles, <del>especially</del><lb/> | ||
be more to than last they he may say Articles, especially | <add>it's all one to me: especially</add> if the paper have but one <del><gap/></del> paragraph in it: in which<lb/> | ||
it's all one to me: especially if the paper have but one <gap/> paragraph in it: in which | case the case will be a <unclear>caring</unclear> one — <gap/> enough to be<lb/> | ||
case the case will be a caring one — <gap/> enough to be | sent to the <gap/> Judges. I should like to see an agent,<lb/> | ||
sent to the <gap/> Judges. I should like to see an agent, | that I should. Well if the <unclear>day were a Note of time</unclear><lb/> | ||
that I should. | or a Bill, or such like <hi rend="underline">Statement</hi> or <hi rend="underline">Plaint</hi> might do well<lb/> | ||
or a Bill, or such | enough for aught I know — that's your concern: let every<lb/> | ||
enough for | body do what they will with their own — that's what I say<lb/> | ||
body do what they will with their own — that's what I say | But when it is a Legacy to the amount of the £100 or the £5<lb/> | ||
But when it is a Legacy to the amount of the £100 or the £5 | that is instead for <!-- blank --> to say <add>at the first word</add> Statement or Plaint? then that<lb/> | ||
that is instead for <!-- blank --> to say at the first word Statement or Plaint? then that | would be too bad: not a <gap/> shall any Plaintiff of mine<lb/> | ||
would be too bad: not a <gap/> shall any Plaintiff of mine | have, unless he says <hi rend="underline">Article</hi>. <del><gap/></del> Yes — I had like to have<lb/> | ||
have, unless he says Article | forgot — or else Articles: let him take his chance For my part<lb/> | ||
forgot — or else Articles: let him take his | I take a pleasure in <unclear>humoring people</unclear>, when there is no harm<lb/> | ||
I take a pleasure in < | <del><gap/></del> done by it.</p> | ||
<gap/> | |||
< | |||
<p>Well now for a little variety. <del>I love variety.</del><lb/> | |||
Variety is a thing to my taste. <add>I have a taste for it.</add> <add>The place in which</add> you put what belonged<lb/> | |||
to you was the body of the Bill: what belongs to me<lb/> | |||
— I mean what comes after that which I have put into<lb/> | |||
the body of the Bill, I put it into the Schedule: there it<lb/> | |||
is quite safe: and <del>there</del> let him <add>them</add> go and look for it. I<lb/> | |||
mean my Defendant <add>Defendant</add>. There they <add>a Defendant</add> will find Articles<lb/> | |||
<del><gap/></del> less than five: no two of them alike: there he may<lb/> | |||
take his choice of them: and take which one of them it<lb/> | |||
is that he thinks will best suit his purpose, he may take<lb/> | |||
all five: or any one, two, three or four of them: that I have <unclear>concerns</unclear><lb/> | |||
that<lb/> | |||
that is all the same<lb/> | |||
to me: except that the<lb/> | |||
more <unclear>than can</unclear> of them,<lb/> | |||
the more I and mine<lb/> | |||
get paid for them, <unclear>for</unclear><lb/> | |||
to any mistakes, or<lb/> | |||
fear of that: had it<lb/> | |||
not been for me, there<lb/> | |||
might <del>perhaps</del> for aught<lb/> | |||
I know have been some<lb/> | |||
<gap/> made: but I am <add>was</add> aware of that: and so I but here have regard to the circumstances of the case.</p> | |||
1830 July 21
Review
§.6. Field of Review, logical
Chicanera
3. Legacia
13
Hundred, statement &
plaint used for the
first application in
other cases article
by Chicanera
Enter now Chicanera Legacia "Sisters!
"Sisters!" (quoth she) you are both in the wrong. Statement
Plaint for the first paper, the Plaintiff given in? No: they those
names won't do, either of them. Article Citation is the sort of paper and the only sort
my Plaintiffs Plaintiff shall begin with giving in. [+]
[+] Then again, as
to the paper first given
in on the Defendants
side: or a case
where it is a Legacy
that is in question
would you have the
paper called an
Answer or a Plaint?
Pooh! Pooh! they are
not fit for the purpose
those names either of
them. Article is
in this case the proper
word and the sole
one that is so. Article
is the name my
Defendant shall give
to the paper of his, or
it will be the worse
for him — I have
Or
Bill and the Schedule
or if the plaint
be more to than last they he may say Articles, especially
it's all one to me: especially if the paper have but one paragraph in it: in which
case the case will be a caring one — enough to be
sent to the Judges. I should like to see an agent,
that I should. Well if the day were a Note of time
or a Bill, or such like Statement or Plaint might do well
enough for aught I know — that's your concern: let every
body do what they will with their own — that's what I say
But when it is a Legacy to the amount of the £100 or the £5
that is instead for to say at the first word Statement or Plaint? then that
would be too bad: not a shall any Plaintiff of mine
have, unless he says Article. Yes — I had like to have
forgot — or else Articles: let him take his chance For my part
I take a pleasure in humoring people, when there is no harm
done by it.
Well now for a little variety. I love variety.
Variety is a thing to my taste. I have a taste for it. The place in which you put what belonged
to you was the body of the Bill: what belongs to me
— I mean what comes after that which I have put into
the body of the Bill, I put it into the Schedule: there it
is quite safe: and there let him them go and look for it. I
mean my Defendant Defendant. There they a Defendant will find Articles
less than five: no two of them alike: there he may
take his choice of them: and take which one of them it
is that he thinks will best suit his purpose, he may take
all five: or any one, two, three or four of them: that I have concerns
that
that is all the same
to me: except that the
more than can of them,
the more I and mine
get paid for them, for
to any mistakes, or
fear of that: had it
not been for me, there
might perhaps for aught
I know have been some
made: but I am was aware of that: and so I but here have regard to the circumstances of the case.
Identifier: | JB/004/142/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 4. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1830-07-21 |
13 |
||
004 |
lord brougham displayed |
||
142 |
review |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
c1 |
||
jeremy bentham |
b&m 1829 |
||
arthur moore; richard doane |
|||
1829 |
|||
2063 |
|||