★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1829 April 19<lb/>Petitions</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p>+ + 3<lb/>(3</p> <p><note>Supplement<lb/>§ 11. Elucidation<lb/>3. Courts Martial</note></p> <p>II Now as to the Official Establishment <del>past</del> part.</p> <p><note><del>8<lb/>Justice of Peace Courts <add>one of the two sorts</add> in<lb/>accordance with proposed<lb/>System by their single<lb/><sic>seatedness</sic></del></note></p> <p>In the case of one of <del><gap/> of</del> the two <add>sorts of</add> summarily proceeding<lb/>Justice of Peace of Courts, that is to say the <hi rend="underline">single-seated</hi><lb/><del>in</del> <add><del>say</del> its</add> accordance with the here proposed system and correspondently<lb/>supposed accordance with the ends of justice so far as regards this<lb/>same feature of <hi rend="underline">single <sic>seatedness</sic></hi> has been brought to view.</p> <p><note><del>9<lb/>But defiled by mixture<lb/>of extraneous functions</del></note></p> <p>But, at the same time, the <del>defiliment</del> <add>defilement</add> contracted by<lb/>the mixture of functions belonging to other branches of the Official<lb/>Establishment — namely the Legislative and the Administrative — are<lb/>also brought to <del>vie</del> <add>view.</add> In the particular the <hi rend="underline">Scotch</hi> Small<lb/>Debt Courts have been stated as standing clear of imputation: <add>not every where<lb/>completely so <del><gap/></del></add> <del>not altogether as</del> the English Small Debt Courts.</p> <p><note><del>10<lb/>In number of suits<lb/>necessary disadvantages<lb/>of the many seated Justice<lb/>of the Peace Courts</del></note></p> <p>In respect of the <del><hi rend="underline">member</hi></del> <add><hi rend="underline">number</hi></add> of the suits <del>in the case of the</del> <add>it has been <sic>shewn</sic><lb/>in how high a degree the</add> <hi rend="underline">many- seated</hi> Justice of <del><gap/></del> Peace summarily proceeding Judicatories<lb/><del><add>it has</add> has been stated as <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> greater <gap/></del> and<lb/>the English Small Debt Courts labour under the disadvantage<lb/><unclear>huge</unclear> opposite to that advantage.</p> <p><note><del>12<lb/>As to parity from<lb/>incompatible functions<lb/>Courts Martial should<lb/>stand as high as <add>here</add> proposed<lb/>Courts</del></note></p> <p>In respect of parity from all corruptive mixture<lb/>of incompatible functions the <hi rend="underline">Courts Martial</hi> stand upon <del>as<lb/>high</del> a height, nearly, if not quite, as high, as the <add><del>its</del></add> Judges<lb/>under the <hi rend="underline">here proposed</hi> system.</p> <p><note><del>13<lb/>In Courts Martial<lb/>however there are reasons<lb/>for substituting at present<lb/>many <sic>seatedness</sic> to single-seatedness</del></note></p> <p>In respect <add>of</add> the number of the seats <add>how every</add> <unclear>side</unclear>; on which<lb/>consideration, in that part of the here proposed system which<lb/>regards the Defensive Persons observations <del>has</del> <add>have</add> place tending to<lb/><sic>shew</sic> under what conditions, <add>and for what reasons,</add> it is supposed that single <sic>seatedness</sic><lb/>might with advantage be substituted to the <add>at present</add> accustomed<lb/>many <sic>seatedness</sic>.</p> | <head>1829 April 19<lb/>Petitions</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p>+ + 3<lb/>(3</p> <p><note>Supplement<lb/>§ 11. Elucidation<lb/>3. Courts Martial</note></p> <p>II Now as to the Official Establishment <del>past</del> part.</p> <p><note><del>8<lb/>Justice of Peace Courts <add>one of the two sorts</add> in<lb/>accordance with proposed<lb/>System by their single<lb/><sic>seatedness</sic></del></note></p> <p>In the case of one of <del><gap/> of</del> the two <add>sorts of</add> summarily proceeding<lb/>Justice of Peace of Courts, that is to say the <hi rend="underline">single-seated</hi><lb/><del>in</del> <add><del>say</del> its</add> accordance with the here proposed system and correspondently<lb/>supposed accordance with the ends of justice so far as regards this<lb/>same feature of <hi rend="underline">single <sic>seatedness</sic></hi> has been brought to view.</p> <p><note><del>9<lb/>But defiled by mixture<lb/>of extraneous functions</del></note></p> <p>But, at the same time, the <del>defiliment</del> <add>defilement</add> contracted by<lb/>the mixture of functions belonging to other branches of the Official<lb/>Establishment — namely the Legislative and the Administrative — are<lb/>also brought to <del>vie</del> <add>view.</add> In the particular the <hi rend="underline">Scotch</hi> Small<lb/>Debt Courts have been stated as standing clear of imputation: <add>not every where<lb/>completely so <del><gap/></del></add> <del>not altogether as</del> the English Small Debt Courts.</p> <p><note><del>10<lb/>In number of suits<lb/>necessary disadvantages<lb/>of the many seated Justice<lb/>of the Peace Courts</del></note></p> <p>In respect of the <del><hi rend="underline">member</hi></del> <add><hi rend="underline">number</hi></add> of the suits <del>in the case of the</del> <add>it has been <sic>shewn</sic><lb/>in how high a degree the</add> <hi rend="underline">many- seated</hi> Justice of <del><gap/></del> Peace summarily proceeding Judicatories<lb/><del><add>it has</add> has been stated as <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> greater <gap/></del> and<lb/>the English Small Debt Courts labour under the disadvantage<lb/><unclear>huge</unclear> opposite to that advantage.</p> <p><note><del>12<lb/>As to parity from<lb/>incompatible functions<lb/>Courts Martial should<lb/>stand as high as <add>here</add> proposed<lb/>Courts</del></note></p> <p>In respect of parity from all corruptive mixture<lb/>of incompatible functions the <hi rend="underline">Courts Martial</hi> stand upon <del>as<lb/>high</del> a height, nearly, if not quite, as high, as the <add><del>its</del></add> Judges<lb/>under the <hi rend="underline">here proposed</hi> system.</p> <p><note><del>13<lb/>In Courts Martial<lb/>however there are reasons<lb/>for substituting at present<lb/>many <sic>seatedness</sic> to single-seatedness</del></note></p> <p>In respect <add>of</add> the number of the seats <add>how every</add> <unclear>side</unclear>; on which<lb/>consideration, in that part of the here proposed system which<lb/>regards the Defensive Persons observations <del>has</del> <add>have</add> place tending to<lb/><sic>shew</sic> under what conditions, <add>and for what reasons,</add> it is supposed that single <sic>seatedness</sic><lb/>might with advantage be substituted to the <add>at present</add> accustomed<lb/>many <sic>seatedness</sic>.</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1829 April 19
Petitions
+ + 3
(3
Supplement
§ 11. Elucidation
3. Courts Martial
II Now as to the Official Establishment past part.
8
Justice of Peace Courts one of the two sorts in
accordance with proposed
System by their single
seatedness
In the case of one of of the two sorts of summarily proceeding
Justice of Peace of Courts, that is to say the single-seated
in say its accordance with the here proposed system and correspondently
supposed accordance with the ends of justice so far as regards this
same feature of single seatedness has been brought to view.
9
But defiled by mixture
of extraneous functions
But, at the same time, the defiliment defilement contracted by
the mixture of functions belonging to other branches of the Official
Establishment — namely the Legislative and the Administrative — are
also brought to vie view. In the particular the Scotch Small
Debt Courts have been stated as standing clear of imputation: not every where
completely so not altogether as the English Small Debt Courts.
10
In number of suits
necessary disadvantages
of the many seated Justice
of the Peace Courts
In respect of the member number of the suits in the case of the it has been shewn
in how high a degree the many- seated Justice of Peace summarily proceeding Judicatories
it has has been stated as greater and
the English Small Debt Courts labour under the disadvantage
huge opposite to that advantage.
12
As to parity from
incompatible functions
Courts Martial should
stand as high as here proposed
Courts
In respect of parity from all corruptive mixture
of incompatible functions the Courts Martial stand upon as
high a height, nearly, if not quite, as high, as the its Judges
under the here proposed system.
13
In Courts Martial
however there are reasons
for substituting at present
many seatedness to single-seatedness
In respect of the number of the seats how every side; on which
consideration, in that part of the here proposed system which
regards the Defensive Persons observations has have place tending to
shew under what conditions, and for what reasons, it is supposed that single seatedness
might with advantage be substituted to the at present accustomed
many seatedness.
|
Identifier: | JB/081/354/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1829-04-19 |
9-13 |
||
|
081 |
petition for justice |
||
|
354 |
petitions |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d3 / e3 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
street & co |
||
|
antonio alcala galiano |
|||
|
26141 |
|||
