JB/072/193/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/072/193/003: Difference between revisions

Petergh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:


<head>11</head> <head>Offences against one's Self - Paederasty<!-- ligature --></head>
<head>11</head> <head>Offences against one's Self - Paederasty<!-- ligature --></head>
<p><note>Whether the patient?</note><lb/>
<p><note>Whether the patient?</note><lb/>
be the agent in his turn? If it were not so, the person<lb/> on whom he supposes those effects to be the greatest is<lb/> precisely the person <add>with regard to</add> <del>on</del> whom it is most difficult<lb/> to conceive whence those [effects] consequences should<lb/> result. In the one case there is exhaustion which<lb/> when carried to excess may be attended <add>follow'd</add> by debility:<lb/> in the other case there is no such thing.</p>
be the agent in his turn? If it were not so, the person<lb/> on whom he supposes those effects to be the greatest is<lb/> precisely the person <add>with regard to</add> <del>on</del> whom it is most difficult<lb/> to conceive whence those [effects] consequences should<lb/> result. In the one case there is exhaustion which<lb/> when carried to excess may be attended <add>follow'd</add> by debility:<lb/> in the other case there is no such thing.</p>
<note>What says History</note><lb/> In regard to this point too in particular,<lb/> what says History? As the two parts that a man<lb/> may take in this business are so easily <add>naturally</add> convertible<lb/> convertible, <del>whether it be</del> however frequently he may<lb/> have taken a passive part, it will not ordinarily<lb/> appear. [<del>So</del> <add>But</add> the few instances in which it <del>does</del> <add>has</add><lb/> <del>appear there does not appear any thing</del> <add>happened to transfer, I can find nothing that tends</add> to favour<lb/> this hypothesis.] According <add>In</add> to the notions of the ancients<lb/> there was something degrading on the passive part<lb/> which there was not in the active. <del>It was making a</del><lb/> <del>man's self a property.</del> It was ministring to the pleasure,<lb/> for so we are obliged to call it, of another, without<lb/> a participation; it was making one's <add><del>a man's</del></add> self the<lb/> property of another man, it was <del>acting</del> <add>playing</add> the woman's<lb/> part, it was therefore unmanly. <note><foreign>Paedicabo<!-- ligature --> <unclear>vos</unclear> &amp; <gap/> Antoni <unclear>pelluce</unclear>, &amp; <unclear>cinaede</unclear> <unclear>Tocare</unclear> <unclear>Caluttus</unclear>. <gap/> <gap/> - <unclear>fortu</unclear> <unclear>vite</unclear> <add><gap/></add></foreign></note>  On the other hand<lb/> to take the active part, was to make use of another<lb/> for one's pleasure, it was making another man<lb/> one's property, it was preserving the manly <add>the commanding</add> character:<lb/> accordingly Solon in his laws <del>forbids</del> prohibits<lb/> slaves from bearing an active part, where the passive<lb/> was to be born by a freeman. In the few instances<lb/> in which we happen to hear of a person's<lb/> ing the passive part there is nothing to favour <add>the</add>
 
<p><note>What says History</note><lb/> In regard to this point too in particular,<lb/> what says History? As the two parts that a man<lb/> may take in this business are so easily <add>naturally</add> convertible<lb/> convertible, <del>whether it be</del> however frequently he may<lb/> have taken a passive part, it will not ordinarily<lb/> appear. [<del>So</del> <add>But</add> the few instances in which it <del>does</del> <add>has</add><lb/> <del>appear there does not appear any thing</del> <add>happened to transfer, I can find nothing that tends</add> to favour<lb/> this hypothesis.] According <add>In</add> to the notions of the ancients<lb/> there was something degrading on the passive part<lb/> which there was not in the active. <del>It was making a</del><lb/> <del>man's self a property.</del> It was ministring to the pleasure,<lb/> for so we are obliged to call it, of another, without<lb/> a participation; it was making one's <add><del>a man's</del></add> self the<lb/> property of another man, it was <del>acting</del> <add>playing</add> the woman's<lb/> part, it was therefore unmanly. <note><foreign>Paedicabo<!-- ligature --> <unclear>vos</unclear> &amp; <gap/> Antoni <unclear>pelluce</unclear>, &amp; <unclear>cinaede</unclear> <unclear>Tocare</unclear> <unclear>Caluttus</unclear>. <gap/> <gap/> - <unclear>fortu</unclear> <unclear>vite</unclear> <add><gap/></add></foreign></note>  On the other hand<lb/> to take the active part, was to make use of another<lb/> for one's pleasure, it was making another man<lb/> one's property, it was preserving the manly <add>the commanding</add> character:<lb/> accordingly Solon in his laws <del>forbids</del> prohibits<lb/> slaves from bearing an active part, where the passive<lb/> was to be born by a freeman. In the few instances<lb/> in which we happen to hear of a person's<lb/> ing the passive part there is nothing to favour <add>the</add></p>


   
   

Revision as of 15:36, 13 January 2012

Click Here To Edit

11 Offences against one's Self - Paederasty

Whether the patient?
be the agent in his turn? If it were not so, the person
on whom he supposes those effects to be the greatest is
precisely the person with regard to on whom it is most difficult
to conceive whence those [effects] consequences should
result. In the one case there is exhaustion which
when carried to excess may be attended follow'd by debility:
in the other case there is no such thing.

What says History
In regard to this point too in particular,
what says History? As the two parts that a man
may take in this business are so easily naturally convertible
convertible, whether it be however frequently he may
have taken a passive part, it will not ordinarily
appear. [So But the few instances in which it does has
appear there does not appear any thing happened to transfer, I can find nothing that tends to favour
this hypothesis.] According In to the notions of the ancients
there was something degrading on the passive part
which there was not in the active. It was making a
man's self a property. It was ministring to the pleasure,
for so we are obliged to call it, of another, without
a participation; it was making one's a man's self the
property of another man, it was acting playing the woman's
part, it was therefore unmanly. Paedicabo vos & Antoni pelluce, & cinaede Tocare Caluttus. - fortu vite On the other hand
to take the active part, was to make use of another
for one's pleasure, it was making another man
one's property, it was preserving the manly the commanding character:
accordingly Solon in his laws forbids prohibits
slaves from bearing an active part, where the passive
was to be born by a freeman. In the few instances
in which we happen to hear of a person's
ing the passive part there is nothing to favour the





Identifier: | JB/072/193/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 72.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

072

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

193

Info in main headings field

paederasty

Image

003

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f9 / f10 / f11 / f12

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23810

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in