JB/034/196/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/034/196/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/034/196/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
(No difference)

Revision as of 16:36, 31 March 2024

Click Here To Edit

1823. Octr.19

Constitutional Code. 2. Enactive Part Ch. Quasi Jury
§ of service
1. Appeal -warranty function

In English bred law as in these cases no Appeal
in any termscondition<add></add> has place: whatever scarcely it would afford
against misd by punishment of the criminal is therefore
under that system in this case wanting. On the other hand to the purpose of
ca and thence imbrev of punishment the time of
the Jury is altogether . One good consequence is that
for punishment an individual is extremely rare:
but a bad consequence is thatin an enormous pa a of individuals
greatly has place.



Identifier: | JB/034/196/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 34.

Date_1

1823-10-19

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

034

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

196

Info in main headings field

constitutional code enactive part

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1822

Marginals

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1822

Notes public

ID Number

10470

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in