JB/055/010/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/055/010/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1825. March 5<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <p><note><sic>Ch.</sic><lb/>&sect;.</note></p> <p><note>2<lb/><sic>Art.</sic> 2. Not so<lb/>where he is <gap/><lb/>for <del>by</del> there would be<lb/>established a denial of<lb/>Justice in the case of sum<lb/>due to an indefinite<lb/>amount</note></p> <p><sic>Art.</sic> 2  Not so where insincerity has place:<lb/><!-- brackets in pencil --> [say, in the first place.] on the Defendant's side.. For were<lb/>they the rule, not the consequence: <del>whatever</del> in each <add>every</add> individual<lb/>case whatsoever were the necessary costs of self-defence,<lb/> a denial of justice to the injury of the pursuer's<lb/>side would be the result of the rule.  Necessary costs of self-defence<lb/>[in paying <sic>expence</sic> of witnesses is <gap/> for <gap/>]<lb/>say as above as apparent on the face of the<lb/>pursuer's <gap/> £5: this being assured <add>the <gap/> supposed</add> here a denial<lb/>of justice to the amount not only <add>merely</add> of the £1 as above, but<lb/>to the amount of £5 to all persons whose debts did not<lb/>exceed £5 would the result of the rule in every case in<lb/>which it would be seen before hand that the <sic>expence</sic> which<lb/>with propriety a Defendant might <gap/> for the purpose<lb/>of self-defence would amount to <add>as high as</add> that sum</p> <p><note>3<lb/><sic>art.</sic> 3. Thus on design<lb/>would men <del>pref</del><lb/>derive some profit by<lb/> obtaining or realising other<lb/>man's money on false pretence,<lb/>whatever were the<lb/>sum <del>his</del> <add>a man's</add> <gap/><lb/>hard fast upon he would<lb/>so contrive that this<lb/>proverbably necessary of<lb/>expence of providing<lb?>himself with <del>the</del> <gap/><lb/>necessary instruments<lb/>of defence i.e. evidence<lb/>should amount to that<lb/>sum or upwards.</note></p> <p><del>Thus</del> Not <gap/> <gap/> here and there a scattered<lb/>instance would injustice in this shape have place, it<lb/>would become systematic and established: preparing to<lb/>react the demand if called upon a <add>dishonest</add> man would instruct<lb/>a debt to <add>say</add> the amount of the £5. as above, taking<lb/>care that his evidence <add>the distance of his evidence from the seat of judicature</add> [for though <gap/> such be<lb/>might contrive to have should be <add>inaccessible</add> such <del>a distance</del> <lb/>that the <sic>expence</sic> of adduction <add>bringing them thither</add> could not be so little <add>less than</add> the<lb/>£5.  whether in the character of sources of personal evidence <add>testament</add><lb/>pursuer could in this way be at command would be matter of<lb/>accident; but in regard to writings and other articles in the character<lb/>of<lb/><!-- continues in the margin --> sources of written and<lb?>other real evidence<lb/>a man might make<lb/>himself <gap/></p>
 
 


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 09:14, 22 July 2024

Click Here To Edit

1825. March 5
Procedure Code

Ch.
§.

2
Art. 2. Not so
where he is
for by there would be
established a denial of
Justice in the case of sum
due to an indefinite
amount

Art. 2 Not so where insincerity has place:
[say, in the first place.] on the Defendant's side.. For were
they the rule, not the consequence: whatever in each every individual
case whatsoever were the necessary costs of self-defence,
a denial of justice to the injury of the pursuer's
side would be the result of the rule. Necessary costs of self-defence
[in paying expence of witnesses is for ]
say as above as apparent on the face of the
pursuer's £5: this being assured the supposed here a denial
of justice to the amount not only merely of the £1 as above, but
to the amount of £5 to all persons whose debts did not
exceed £5 would the result of the rule in every case in
which it would be seen before hand that the expence which
with propriety a Defendant might for the purpose
of self-defence would amount to as high as that sum

3
art. 3. Thus on design
would men pref
derive some profit by
obtaining or realising other
man's money on false pretence,
whatever were the
sum his a man's
hard fast upon he would
so contrive that this
proverbably necessary of
expence of providing<lb?>himself with the
necessary instruments
of defence i.e. evidence
should amount to that
sum or upwards.

Thus Not here and there a scattered
instance would injustice in this shape have place, it
would become systematic and established: preparing to
react the demand if called upon a dishonest man would instruct
a debt to say the amount of the £5. as above, taking
care that his evidence the distance of his evidence from the seat of judicature [for though such be
might contrive to have should be inaccessible such a distance
that the expence of adduction bringing them thither could not be so little less than the
£5. whether in the character of sources of personal evidence testament
pursuer could in this way be at command would be matter of
accident; but in regard to writings and other articles in the character
of
sources of written and<lb?>other real evidence
a man might make
himself



Identifier: | JB/055/010/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 55.

Date_1

1825-03-05

Marginal Summary Numbering

2-3

Box

055

Main Headings

Procedure Code

Folio number

010

Info in main headings field

Procedure Code

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

C2

Penner

Watermarks

J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1824

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Jonathan Blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

17731

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in