★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
Auto upload |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
' | <head>1823. <sic>Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> 8. +<lb/><add>Procedure</add> <del>Constitutional Code</del> <add>Procedure</add></head> <p><note><sic>Ch.</sic></note><lb/>(1 <note>§.1. Modes of Judicial abuse</note></p> <p>Modes of abuse, of which litigation is liable to be made the<lb/>Punishment</p> <p><note>1<lb/>Causes of the evil<lb/>of which litigation is<lb/>liable to be made the<lb/>instrument<lb/>1. <sic>Expence</sic> in some cases<lb/>2. Absence of <sic>d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> in others</note.</p> <p>From <add>In</add> two opposite causes <Add>ways<a/dd> a suit at law is liable<lb/>to be converted into an instrument of vexation and expression.<lb/>1. by mans of the <sic>expence</sic> attached to it, <add>on the one/defendants side</add> and<lb/>by means of the absence of it, on the <add>del><gap/></del> </add> other or the pursuer's<lb/>side.</p> <p><note>2<lb/><sic>Expence</sic> natural and<lb/>factitious — a distinction<lb/>necessary how</note></p> <p><del>In the</del> Natural <sic>expence</sic> — factitious <sic>expence</sic>: necessary<lb/>for consideration is the difference indicated by these two<lb/><gap/>.</p> <p><note>3<lb/>1. Natural <sic>expence</sic><lb/>From this n suit<lb?>howsoever simple can<lb/>be altogether clear</note></p> <p>First as to the natural <sic>expence</sic>. From experience<lb/>and whatever, how simple so ever in its nature can be<lb/>altogether exempt. <del><gap/> <gap/></del> <add>Time</add> employed in personal<lb/>attendance in the judicatory or in penning a paper addressed<lb/>to the Judge is attended with <add>correspondent and</add> proportionate <sic>expence</sic><lb/>for, in the situation of him, whose <add>means of</add> subsistence depend on labour<lb/>and thereby on time employed in labour, <add>by</add> time<lb/>which instead of being employed on profit yielding<lb/>labour is employed in paying at a judicatory or<lb/>elsewhere unprofitable <add><sic>unprofit</sic> yielding</add> attendance, as much <del>money</del><lb/>as expenditure is made <add>loss is suffered</add>, as by the expenditure of the<lb/>money which would have been earned by it.</p> <p><note>5<lb/>Minimum of <sic>expence</sci><lb/>attached to litigation<lb/>the money a labourer<lb/>of the lowest paid class<lb/>would have earned in<lb/>the time. To him<lb/>the <sic>expence</sic> is boundless.</note></p> <p>The sum of money which but for the attendance paid<lb/>would or might have been earned <add>during the time in question</add> by a labourer belonging to<lb/>that class of labourers <del>at</del> in whose instance the ordinary wages<lb/>of labour are <add><gap/> to the least sum</add> of the least <gap/> represents the minimum of<lb/>judicial <sic>expence</sic> to the maximum there can be no determinate bounds.</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} |
1823. Decr 8. +
Procedure Constitutional Code Procedure
Ch.
(1 §.1. Modes of Judicial abuse
Modes of abuse, of which litigation is liable to be made the
Punishment
1
Causes of the evil
of which litigation is
liable to be made the
instrument
1. Expence in some cases
2. Absence of do in others</note.
From In two opposite causes ways<a/dd> a suit at law is liable
to be converted into an instrument of vexation and expression.
1. by mans of the expence attached to it, <add>on the one/defendants side and
by means of the absence of it, on the del> other or the pursuer's
side.
<note>2
Expence natural and
factitious — a distinction
necessary how
In the Natural expence — factitious expence: necessary
for consideration is the difference indicated by these two
.
3
1. Natural expence
From this n suit<lb?>howsoever simple can
be altogether clear
First as to the natural expence. From experience
and whatever, how simple so ever in its nature can be
altogether exempt. Time employed in personal
attendance in the judicatory or in penning a paper addressed
to the Judge is attended with correspondent and proportionate expence
for, in the situation of him, whose means of subsistence depend on labour
and thereby on time employed in labour, by time
which instead of being employed on profit yielding
labour is employed in paying at a judicatory or
elsewhere unprofitable unprofit yielding attendance, as much money
as expenditure is made loss is suffered, as by the expenditure of the
money which would have been earned by it.
5
Minimum of expence</sci>
attached to litigation
the money a labourer
of the lowest paid class
would have earned in
the time. To him
the <sic>expence is boundless.
The sum of money which but for the attendance paid
would or might have been earned during the time in question by a labourer belonging to
that class of labourers at in whose instance the ordinary wages
of labour are to the least sum of the least represents the minimum of
judicial expence to the maximum there can be no determinate bounds.
Identifier: | JB/055/040/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 55. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1823-12-08 |
1-5 |
||
055 |
Constitutional Code; Procedure Code |
||
040 |
Procedure or Procedure |
||
001 |
|||
Text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
D1 / E1 |
||
J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1823 |
|||
Jonathan Blenman |
|||
1823 |
|||
17761 |
|||