JB/055/212/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/055/212/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/055/212/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/055/212/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1825. April 24<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Procedure Code</head></p>
 
<p>Hence in each individual case, the need of an account<lb/>
to be taken by the Judge:  an account more or less <unclear>careful</unclear> and<lb/>
particular according to the importance of the case with reference <add>relation</add><lb/>
to the direct ends of justice, the quantum of delay, vexation<lb/>
and expence attached to the journey, and the capacity of the parties<lb/>
<del>in question</del> <add>on whom it</add> may eventually fall to <del>defray</del> endure the burthen<lb/>
of the expence.</p>
<p>Thus it is – that on this occasion, as on so many<lb/>
others, between the direct ends of justice on the one hand, and<lb/>
the collateral ends on the other, a sort of conflict may be seen<lb/>
to have place.  Employ <add>in all cases</add> the oral mode along with the written<lb/>
and at the same time with the written, say the direct ends of justice:<lb/>
employ the epistolary mode in the first instance, and<lb/>
thereupon eventually only, say in many cases the collateral<lb/>
ends of justice:  and individually taken not a few will be<lb/>
the stances, in which <del>both ends</del> the reason, on both sides<lb/>
being taken into the account, the verdict of the principle of utility<lb/>
will be in favour of the collateral ends of justice.</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 04:53, 23 October 2024

Click Here To Edit

1825. April 24
Procedure Code

Hence in each individual case, the need of an account
to be taken by the Judge: an account more or less careful and
particular according to the importance of the case with reference relation
to the direct ends of justice, the quantum of delay, vexation
and expence attached to the journey, and the capacity of the parties
in question on whom it may eventually fall to defray endure the burthen
of the expence.

Thus it is – that on this occasion, as on so many
others, between the direct ends of justice on the one hand, and
the collateral ends on the other, a sort of conflict may be seen
to have place. Employ in all cases the oral mode along with the written
and at the same time with the written, say the direct ends of justice:
employ the epistolary mode in the first instance, and
thereupon eventually only, say in many cases the collateral
ends of justice: and individually taken not a few will be
the stances, in which both ends the reason, on both sides
being taken into the account, the verdict of the principle of utility
will be in favour of the collateral ends of justice.



Identifier: | JB/055/212/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 55.

Date_1

1825-04-24

Marginal Summary Numbering

22-24

Box

055

Main Headings

Procedure Code

Folio number

212

Info in main headings field

Procedure Code

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

E7

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

17933

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in