★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
m Protected "JB/549/109/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/549/109/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/549/109/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>1827 Apr. 6<lb/> | |||
' | <!-- pencil --><head>Logic Language and Codes under title <hi rend="underline">Form</hi></head></p> | ||
<p>Correspondent and opposite to conciseness is over-bulkiness:<lb/> | |||
<del>it <gap/> which</del> that which it bears reference to<lb/> | |||
is the ratio between the <unclear>extent</unclear> of the thought and the<lb/> | |||
number of the words contained in the locution employed<lb/> | |||
in giving expression to it.</p> | |||
<p>To this subject applies the <del>following rule</del> principle<lb/> | |||
which may be termed the word-minimizing principle.<lb/> | |||
The Corresonding Rule: may be then expressed.</p> | |||
<p>The thought being given, and the <del>expression supposed</del> <add>locution employed<lb/> | |||
in giving expression to it being supposed</add> commensurate to it, minimize the number of<lb/> | |||
words of which the locution is composed.</p> | |||
<p>Or in the language of proportionality say thus</p> | |||
<p>The thought being given, and the locution employed<lb/> | |||
in giving expression to it being supposed commensurate<lb/> | |||
to it, the aptitude of the locution is inversely as<lb/> | |||
the number of the words of which it is composed.</p> | |||
<p>Where <del>bearing this</del> without prejudice to the<lb/> | |||
commensurateness of the locution the overplus in<lb/> | |||
words is capable of being substracted or say eliminated<lb/> | |||
without prejudice to the commensurateness of the<lb/> | |||
locution – <add>in other words</add> the <del>amendment</del> requisite amendment capable<lb/> | |||
of being made by simple elimination, substraction<lb/> | |||
or say defalcation, the <del>diff</del> number of words thus<lb/> | |||
capable of being defalcated constitute, with reference<lb/> | |||
to the locution as it stands, that which in lawyer's<lb/> | |||
language is termed <hi rend="underline">surplusage</hi>.</p> | |||
<p><del>The benefit</del> Of the operation by which utterance<lb/> | |||
is given to the matter of discourse the <hi rend="underline">benefit</hi> is composed of<lb/> | |||
the thoughts conveyed to the minds of the several <unclear>receivers</unclear> – indicative<lb/> | |||
or <gap/>: the <hi rend="underline">burthen</hi>, or say the <hi rend="underline">expence</hi> <add>or <hi rend="underline">price</hi> paid</add> of the <del>locuti</del><lb/> | |||
number of the words<lb/> | |||
of which the locution<lb/> | |||
employed is composed.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}} |
1827 Apr. 6
Logic Language and Codes under title Form
Correspondent and opposite to conciseness is over-bulkiness:
it which that which it bears reference to
is the ratio between the extent of the thought and the
number of the words contained in the locution employed
in giving expression to it.
To this subject applies the following rule principle
which may be termed the word-minimizing principle.
The Corresonding Rule: may be then expressed.
The thought being given, and the expression supposed locution employed
in giving expression to it being supposed commensurate to it, minimize the number of
words of which the locution is composed.
Or in the language of proportionality say thus
The thought being given, and the locution employed
in giving expression to it being supposed commensurate
to it, the aptitude of the locution is inversely as
the number of the words of which it is composed.
Where bearing this without prejudice to the
commensurateness of the locution the overplus in
words is capable of being substracted or say eliminated
without prejudice to the commensurateness of the
locution – in other words the amendment requisite amendment capable
of being made by simple elimination, substraction
or say defalcation, the diff number of words thus
capable of being defalcated constitute, with reference
to the locution as it stands, that which in lawyer's
language is termed surplusage.
The benefit Of the operation by which utterance
is given to the matter of discourse the benefit is composed of
the thoughts conveyed to the minds of the several receivers – indicative
or : the burthen, or say the expence or price paid of the locuti
number of the words
of which the locution
employed is composed.
Identifier: | JB/549/109/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 549. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1827-04-06 |
5-7 |
||
549 |
|||
109 |
|||
001 |
|||
Text sheet |
|||
Jeremy Bentham |
|||