JB/072/197/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/072/197/003: Difference between revisions

Petergh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Petergh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
<p><note>Among the <sic>antients</sic> it excluded not the regular taste</note><lb/>
<p><note>Among the <sic>antients</sic> it excluded not the regular taste</note><lb/>
matter of indifference <del><gap/></del> a prostitute <add>of either sex</add> or a boy: &amp;<lb/> the same poet who [forgetting himself now &amp; then]<lb/> says a little here and there about boys, says a<lb/> great deal every where about women. The same<lb/> observation will hold good with respect to every other<lb/> personage of antiquity <del><gap/> <unclear>how</unclear> <unclear>or</unclear> whether by</del> who either<lb/> by his own writing <add>account</add>, or those <add>that</add> of another is represented<lb/> to us as being infected with this taste. It is so in<lb/> all the poets who in any of their works have occasion<lb/> to say any thing about themselves. Some few appear<lb/> to have had no appetite for boys, as is the case<lb/> for instance with Ovid, who [takes express notice <del>for</del> <add>of</add> it<lb/> and] gives <del>his</del> <add>a</add> reason for it. But it is <del>an <gap/></del> a<lb/> <sic>neverfailing</sic> rule <del><unclear>where</unclear></del> wherever you see any thing<lb/> [in their works] about boys, you see a great deal more<lb/> about women. Virgil has one Alexis: but he has Galateas,<lb/> <!-- two line gap left blank --><lb/> in abundance. Let us do no man wrong <add>be unjust to no man</add>: not even to a paederast.<!-- ligature --> <note>In all antiquity, there is not a single <del>instance</del> instance of an author nor scarce an explicit account of any other man who was addicted exclusively to this taste. Nor does it among the moderns </note> <del>The</del> <add>Even in modern times, the</add> real women-haters are to be found<lb/> not <add>so much</add> among paederasts,<!-- ligature --> but <add>as</add> among <del><gap/></del> monks and<lb/> catholic priests, such of them, be they more or fewer,<lb/> who think and act in consistency with their profession.</p>
matter of indifference <del><gap/></del> a prostitute <add>of either sex</add> or a boy: &amp;<lb/> the same poet who [forgetting himself now &amp; then]<lb/> says a little here and there about boys, says a<lb/> great deal every where about women. The same<lb/> observation will hold good with respect to every other<lb/> personage of antiquity <del><gap/> <unclear>how</unclear> <unclear>or</unclear> whether by</del> who either<lb/> by his own writing <add>account</add>, or those <add>that</add> of another is represented<lb/> to us as being infected with this taste. It is so in<lb/> all the poets who in any of their works have occasion<lb/> to say any thing about themselves. Some few appear<lb/> to have had no appetite for boys, as is the case<lb/> for instance with Ovid, who [takes express notice <del>for</del> <add>of</add> it<lb/> and] gives <del>his</del> <add>a</add> reason for it. But it is <del>an <gap/></del> a<lb/> <sic>neverfailing</sic> rule <del><unclear>where</unclear></del> wherever you see any thing<lb/> [in their works] about boys, you see a great deal more<lb/> about women. Virgil has one Alexis: but he has Galateas,<lb/> <!-- two line gap left blank --><lb/> in abundance. Let us do no man wrong <add>be unjust to no man</add>: not even to a paederast.<!-- ligature --> <note>In all antiquity, there is not a single <del>instance</del> instance of an author nor scarce an explicit account of any other man who was addicted exclusively to this taste. Nor does it among the moderns </note> <del>The</del> <add>Even in modern times, the</add> real women-haters are to be found<lb/> not <add>so much</add> among paederasts,<!-- ligature --> but <add>as</add> among <del><gap/></del> monks and<lb/> catholic priests, such of them, be they more or fewer,<lb/> who think and act in consistency with their profession.</p>
<p><note><unclear>Keafon</unclear> why it might be expected so to do</note>I say even in modern times: for there is one<lb/> circumstance which should render <add>make</add> this taste where it<lb/> does prevail, much more likely to be exclusive <add>[of the other]</add> <del><unclear>than</unclear></del> at present than it was formerly. I mean the severity<lb/> with which it is now treated by the laws, and the<lb/> contempt and abhorrence with which it is regarded <add>by</add> </p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 15:58, 19 January 2012

Click Here To Edit

27 Paederasty

Among the antients it excluded not the regular taste
matter of indifference a prostitute of either sex or a boy: &
the same poet who [forgetting himself now & then]
says a little here and there about boys, says a
great deal every where about women. The same
observation will hold good with respect to every other
personage of antiquity how or whether by who either
by his own writing account, or those that of another is represented
to us as being infected with this taste. It is so in
all the poets who in any of their works have occasion
to say any thing about themselves. Some few appear
to have had no appetite for boys, as is the case
for instance with Ovid, who [takes express notice for of it
and] gives his a reason for it. But it is an a
neverfailing rule where wherever you see any thing
[in their works] about boys, you see a great deal more
about women. Virgil has one Alexis: but he has Galateas,

in abundance. Let us do no man wrong be unjust to no man: not even to a paederast. In all antiquity, there is not a single instance instance of an author nor scarce an explicit account of any other man who was addicted exclusively to this taste. Nor does it among the moderns The Even in modern times, the real women-haters are to be found
not so much among paederasts, but as among monks and
catholic priests, such of them, be they more or fewer,
who think and act in consistency with their profession.

Keafon why it might be expected so to doI say even in modern times: for there is one
circumstance which should render make this taste where it
does prevail, much more likely to be exclusive [of the other] than at present than it was formerly. I mean the severity
with which it is now treated by the laws, and the
contempt and abhorrence with which it is regarded by




Identifier: | JB/072/197/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 72.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

072

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

197

Info in main headings field

paederasty

Image

003

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f25 / f26 / f27 / f28

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23814

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in