JB/050/145/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/050/145/001: Difference between revisions

Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/050/145/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/050/145/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
under construction by Diane Folan ... please do not amend!




Line 23: Line 20:
<lb/></p>
<lb/></p>


<p>In the instance of particular crimes [to be specified by the law] for which, (should<lb/>
<p>In the instance of particular crimes [to be specified by the law] for which, (should
there be any such), it may be thought advisable to retain punishments <hi rend='underline'>in <unclear>hor</unclear></hi><lb/> as it is called, without design of universal execution - as <del>in</del> <add>under</add> the Laws<lb/> against Papists, these specifications may be dispensed with.<lb/></p>
<lb/>
 
there be any such) , it may be thought <sic>adviseable</sic> to retain punishments <hi rend='underline'>in <gap/></hi>
<note><gap/>? should he name of the person applying for the <gap/> be specified in the <gap/> would or would not this be laying too great a restriction on Pardons if a man venture <add>was forced to</add> himself to procure one
<lb/>  
<gap/> too whether any <unclear>distinction</unclear> this law between crimes</note><pb/>
as it is called , without design of universal execution &#x2014; as <del>in</del> <add>under</add> the Laws
<lb/>  
against Papists , these specifications may be dispensed with . <note>Qu? should the name of the person applying for the Pardon be specified in the Instrument would or would not this be laying too great a restriction on Pardons if a man venture <add>was forced to</add> himself to procure one
Qu. <sic>too</sic> whether any distinction <unclear>in</unclear> this head between Crimes .</note>
<lb/></p>


<!-- horizontal line -->
<pb/>





Revision as of 12:38, 20 January 2012

Click Here To Edit


PARDON

others either the circumstance specified is not in being isse & incapable therefore of being ma
the subject of a Trial , or is of too vague a nature to be collected from legal
evidence. [under, legal limitations limitations of legal rules .]

The check therefore here imposed , is the only check competent to the subject , the
same as that upon Juries the sense of shame — to which may be added , Impeachment
of the Person applying for the Pardon in any flagrant case where as in ca
of the suggestion containing a very notorious falsehood - —

In the instance of particular crimes [to be specified by the law] for which, (should
there be any such) , it may be thought adviseable to retain punishments in
as it is called , without design of universal execution — as in under the Laws
against Papists , these specifications may be dispensed with . Qu? should the name of the person applying for the Pardon be specified in the Instrument would or would not this be laying too great a restriction on Pardons if a man venture was forced to himself to procure one Qu. too whether any distinction in this head between Crimes .


---page break---





Identifier: | JB/050/145/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

050

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

145

Info in main headings field

pardon

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16136

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in