JB/118/234/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/118/234/002: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/118/234/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/118/234/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<p>6<lb/>
<del>6.  4. Recommendation<lb/>
given of dispatch</del>
6.  4.  Dispatch recommended<lb/>
by Finance<lb/>
Committee so<lb/>
long ago as June <del><gap/></del><lb/>
1798 – Treasuring on<lb/>
that same occasion<lb/>
declaring their disposition<lb/>
to go on with<lb/>
the business:  <del>reproach<lb/>
<gap/></del> not the
</p>
<p>27 April 1811<lb/>
<p>27 April 1811<lb/>
<head>Penitentiary Committee – Topics proposed to be touched upon in a First Report<lb/>
<head>Penitentiary Committee – Topics proposed to be touched upon in a First Report<lb/>
Line 61: Line 44:
the Committee.</p>
the Committee.</p>
<pb/>
<pb/>
 
<p>6<lb/>
 
<del>6.  4. Recommendation<lb/>
given of dispatch</del>
6.  4.  Dispatch recommended<lb/>
by Finance<lb/>
Committee so<lb/>
long ago as June <del><gap/></del><lb/>
1798 – Treasuring on<lb/>
that same occasion<lb/>
declaring their disposition<lb/>
to go on with<lb/>
the business:  <del>reproach<lb/>
<gap/></del> not the <unclear>Reasons</unclear>
of an objection ever<lb/>
brought forward by<lb/>
anybody:  <del>unexampled<lb/>
<gap/></del> neglect<lb/>
of acknowledged duty<lb/>
aggravated by breach<lb/>
of faith, unexampled<lb/>
in length of continuance:<lb/>
reproach in<lb/>
the whole frame of Government<lb/>
in case of<lb/>
ulterior delay.</p>
<p><del>5.  If approved by experience</del></p>
<p>7.  5. Extensibility of<lb/>
the Panopticon principle<lb/>
viz. by Temporary Female Panopticon<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> as per M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi><lb/>
B.s Letter II to Committee<lb/>
(intended to be<lb/>
printed) and d<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi><lb/>
Letter III to d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> (intended<lb/>
to be sent,)<lb/>
extensibility, viz. if<lb/>
approved by experience<lb/>
further reason for <hi rend="underline">commencement</hi><lb/>
of the experience.</p>
<pb/>
<p>8<lb/>
6.  Irretrievable injury<lb/>
<del>to sustain</del> done to<lb/>
M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> B. and his Brother<lb/>
Gen. B. injuries for<lb/>
which no compensation<lb/>
can be made.</p>
<p>Loss of the money spent<lb/>
on the inventions which<lb/>
were the ground of<lb/>
the manufacturing<lb/>
concern, <del><gap/></del> <add>actal</add> products<lb/>
of which were seen by<lb/>
so many Members of<lb/>
the House, including<lb/>
several of the Committee.</p>
<p>Loss of the money spent<lb/>
upon it, as per <del>Finance<lb/>
Committee 2.</del>  N.B.<lb/>
Examination in Finance<lb/>
Committees 28<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> Report.</p>
<p>Recommendation<lb/>
accordingly that the<lb/>
<add>state of the</add> family be considered<lb/>
in the amended terms.<lb/>
(&#9758; Quere whether<lb/>
this <add>topic</add> to be ventured on?)</p>
<p>9<lb/>
Twenty years since<lb/>
M<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi> B.'s Proposal was<lb/>
first given in:  18 since<lb/>
it was accepted, and<lb/>
M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> B once by<lb/>
M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Pitt and <add>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></add> Dundas<lb/>
together at his own<lb/>
House <add>in presence of Gen. B.</add> desired <add>so</add> to take<lb/>
"his arrangements" – then<lb/>
again by M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Dundas<lb/>
at the office called<lb/>
upon so to do.</p>
<p>This with every other<lb/>
fact stated in M<hi rend="underline">r</hi> B.s<lb/>
said Examination must<lb/>
<gap/> to be <unclear>entire</unclear> <gap/> unquestionable,<lb/>
so many persons being <add>thus</add> urged by<lb/>
self-defence, <del>and</del> none<lb/>
of them venturing to<lb/>
question it.</p>
<pb/>
<p>10<lb/>
Aº 1798, the profits<lb/>
if any, from the Contract<lb/>
being by the terms of it<lb/>
to be received <del>by M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi><lb/>
and Gen. B.</del> to the end<lb/>
of the life of the survivors<lb/>
of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> &amp; Gen. B. and<lb/>
no longer, an Annuity<lb/>
for that term was on<lb/>
the 19<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> of June 1798<lb/>
estimated by M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Morgan<lb/>
as per Fin. Comm.<lb/>
28<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> Rep. p.81. had it<lb/>
then commencement<lb/>
immediately at not<lb/>
so much as 12 1/2 years<lb/>
purchase:  and since<lb/>
<add>the</add> that <del><gap/></del> time<lb/>
13 years have elapsed<lb/>
already.</p>
<p>11<lb/>
Recommendation to<lb/>
Treasury to compleat<lb/>
the purchase out of Tothill<lb/>
Fields &amp;c according<lb/>
to the <add><del>printed</del></add> notice given<lb/>
by Treasury Solicitor<lb/>
Aº 1799.  The obligation<lb/>
of such completion is<lb/>
<del>necessary</del> <add>imposed</add> not only by<lb/>
the terms of the Contract<lb/>
as necessary to compleat<lb/>
the stipulated quantity<lb/>
of 79 Acres, but to the<lb/>
purpose of the Subsidiary<lb/>
Establishment as<lb/>
per d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> (number of which<lb/>
was forgotten to be made<lb/>
by M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> B in his first<lb/>
Examination 27 March last).  N.B.  Not many<lb/>
days ago Tothill Fields<lb/>
was let by the Dean &amp;<lb/>
Chapter for 40 years<lb/>
at £12 a year per Acre.<lb/>
Out of the increase of expence<lb/>
produced by the<lb/>
delay and <gap/> of<lb/>
Treasury, the danger is<lb/>
that they will make a pretence<lb/>
for breaking their part<lb/>
of the Contract.</p>
<p>12<lb/>
Recommendation to<lb/>
give to the Panopticon the<lb/>
size necessary for the<lb/>
2000 Prisoners determined<lb/>
on by Treasury Letter to<lb/>
M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> B. 25 March 1800.<lb/>
Of this extension of size<lb/>
of the Building, the <add><del>obligation to <gap/></del></add> commitment if any beyond the Contract Number of 1000 will not be an obligatory consequence.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 00:31, 15 November 2024

Click Here To Edit

27 April 1811
Penitentiary Committee – Topics proposed to be touched upon in a First Report
to be confined to the subject of the Panopticon Plan antecedently to the engaging
in any ulterior enquiries.

1
1. As to the delay
enquiry into the
causes of it waived
(conditionally at least)
waived

2
2. But promptness
in future urgent pressed.
Reasons for such pressure

3
3. 1. Urgency of the
case of the Female
Convicts.

4. 2. Merit of the proposed
Contractor Manager in
meeting what he understood
to be in the
opinion of the Committee
the exigency of
the public service,
and without profit
to himself, and to
his eventual loss.

5
5. 3. Considering his
advanced time of
life (upwards of 63)
danger of being by
death the services of
a person whose attention
to and mastery of
the subject is evidenced
by those various writings works
of his that are lying
on the Table of
the Committee.


---page break---

6
6. 4. Recommendation
given of dispatch
6. 4. Dispatch recommended
by Finance
Committee so
long ago as June
1798 – Treasuring on
that same occasion
declaring their disposition
to go on with
the business: reproach
not the Reasons of an objection ever
brought forward by
anybody: unexampled
neglect
of acknowledged duty
aggravated by breach
of faith, unexampled
in length of continuance:
reproach in
the whole frame of Government
in case of
ulterior delay.

5. If approved by experience

7. 5. Extensibility of
the Panopticon principle
viz. by Temporary Female Panopticon
as per Mr
B.s Letter II to Committee
(intended to be
printed) and do.
Letter III to do (intended
to be sent,)
extensibility, viz. if
approved by experience
further reason for commencement
of the experience.


---page break---

8
6. Irretrievable injury
to sustain done to
Mr B. and his Brother
Gen. B. injuries for
which no compensation
can be made.

Loss of the money spent
on the inventions which
were the ground of
the manufacturing
concern, actal products
of which were seen by
so many Members of
the House, including
several of the Committee.

Loss of the money spent
upon it, as per Finance
Committee 2.
N.B.
Examination in Finance
Committees 28th Report.

Recommendation
accordingly that the
state of the family be considered
in the amended terms.
(☞ Quere whether
this topic to be ventured on?)

9
Twenty years since
Mr. B.'s Proposal was
first given in: 18 since
it was accepted, and
Mr B once by
Mr Pitt and Mr Dundas
together at his own
House in presence of Gen. B. desired so to take
"his arrangements" – then
again by Mr Dundas
at the office called
upon so to do.

This with every other
fact stated in Mr B.s
said Examination must
to be entire unquestionable,
so many persons being thus urged by
self-defence, and none
of them venturing to
question it.


---page break---

10
Aº 1798, the profits
if any, from the Contract
being by the terms of it
to be received by Mr
and Gen. B.
to the end
of the life of the survivors
of Mr & Gen. B. and
no longer, an Annuity
for that term was on
the 19th of June 1798
estimated by Mr Morgan
as per Fin. Comm.
28th Rep. p.81. had it
then commencement
immediately at not
so much as 12 1/2 years
purchase: and since
the that time
13 years have elapsed
already.

11
Recommendation to
Treasury to compleat
the purchase out of Tothill
Fields &c according
to the printed notice given
by Treasury Solicitor
Aº 1799. The obligation
of such completion is
necessary imposed not only by
the terms of the Contract
as necessary to compleat
the stipulated quantity
of 79 Acres, but to the
purpose of the Subsidiary
Establishment as
per do (number of which
was forgotten to be made
by Mr B in his first
Examination 27 March last). N.B. Not many
days ago Tothill Fields
was let by the Dean &
Chapter for 40 years
at £12 a year per Acre.
Out of the increase of expence
produced by the
delay and of
Treasury, the danger is
that they will make a pretence
for breaking their part
of the Contract.

12
Recommendation to
give to the Panopticon the
size necessary for the
2000 Prisoners determined
on by Treasury Letter to
Mr B. 25 March 1800.
Of this extension of size
of the Building, the obligation to commitment if any beyond the Contract Number of 1000 will not be an obligatory consequence.


Identifier: | JB/118/234/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 118.

Date_1

1811-04-27

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-12

Box

118

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

234

Info in main headings field

penitentiary committee - topics proposed to be touched upon in a first report to be confined to the subject of the panopticon plan or the engaging in any ulterior enquiries

Image

002

Titles

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

th 1806

Marginals

Paper Producer

andre morellet

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

ID Number

39288

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in