JB/023/097/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/023/097/002: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/023/097/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/023/097/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<p>1830. Aug 28<lb/>
<head>Review</head><note>VIII <del>IX</del> Nomography<lb/>
4. Inadequate<lb/>
Ambiguity excluding clauses.</note></p>
<p><add>In &sect;.105.</add> Provision for clearing the text of the law <add>Statute Book</add> from the ambiguity<lb/>
liable to be produced by the customary <unclear>classical</unclear> forms of speech<lb/>
: those which request person, gender and number for example</p>
<p>In an all comprehensive Code <del>such as that of which</del> <add>in the Bentham stile</add><lb/>
<del>Bentham was the first to hold up to view</del>, once for all would<lb/>
all those matters be settled:  subject-matter thus for a correspondent<lb/>
</p>





Revision as of 04:06, 1 December 2024

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in