JB/096/031/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/031/001: Difference between revisions

JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 31: Line 31:
If our Author will give it a new name <lb/>
If our Author will give it a new name <lb/>
he has my free leave: <add><del>leave to call it an extralegal Act</del></add> let him call it if he will an extralegal Act<lb/>
he has my free leave: <add><del>leave to call it an extralegal Act</del></add> let him call it if he will an extralegal Act<lb/>
<del>of a Law, <del><gap/></del>, not because its operation is spent upon a single person, but <del><lb/>
<del>of a Law, <gap/></del>, not because its operation is spent upon a single person, but <lb/>
<del>because the master is not a proper object of Legislation. It ought</del><lb/>
<del>because the master is not a proper object of Legislation. It ought</del><lb/>
<del>not <add>even</add> to be called a Sentence, &#x2014; because it is not, <add>before cannot be before</add> between</del><lb/>
<del>not <add>even</add> to be called a Sentence, &#x2014; because it is not, <add>before cannot be before</add> between</del><lb/>

Revision as of 12:45, 24 January 2012

Click Here To Edit


---page break---

To be copied "to the community in general." When he adds
with a kind of timidity and reluctance
"that this it is rather a Sentence than a law."
[I could have wished he had spoken out in a
bolder stile, and as become a man and a
Citizen. Though this be an It certainly is an act of the Persons,
in whom the power of legislation is
vested: yet it is not a prop properly an act of the the
Legislature or at least not of the Legislature<lb> alone. For in such an act, these persons <lb> do, either lay aside their Legislative powers, <lb> or do assume, and super add to them, the judicial
power. And, I think, our Author
should have carefully distinguished


---page break---

Is it done in their legislative capacity
or not? if it be, it must be a Law, for it is a declaration of the
will of the Legislature, is a Law. If it is not, if in this act <lb> the legislative power is laid aside, & the judicial power only assumed <lb> then it is a sentence. — But whether it be a Law, or a Sentence <lb> it is a very bad thing. — In the one case it is an abuse of the Legislative And if our Author has a mind for
power: in the other a Judgment pronounced by an incompetent court tribunal:
a new name he has any good Such an act does not deserve the name
If our Author will give it a new name
he has my free leave: leave to call it an extralegal Act let him call it if he will an extralegal Act
of a Law, , not because its operation is spent upon a single person, but
because the master is not a proper object of Legislation. It ought
not even to be called a Sentence, — because it is not, before cannot be before between
a competent Judge. It is an extra-legal Act, which no nothing

78)


---page break---




Identifier: | JB/096/031/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

comment on the commentaries

Folio number

031

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

collectanea

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c78 / c79

Penner

168

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[quartered royal arms motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

[[notes_public::"to be copied" [note not in bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

31035

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in