JB/056/231/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/056/231/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1827. <sic>Nov<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi></sic> 5 +<lb/>Law Amendment.</head> <p><note><sic>ult</sic><lb/>Propositions.<lb/><sic>Ch</sic> Procedure<lb/>&sect; <gap/></note></p> <p><del>Scene Oral <gap/> the originating Judicatory<lb/>on whose <hi rend="underline">part</hi><lb/>Individuals in whose nature attendance shall be appreciated<lb/><!-- brackets in pencil -->[Days and <gap/> which in the instance <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> as<lb/>shall be appointed <add>ordered</add></del>]</p> <p><note>1<lb/>persons whose<lb/>attendance required<lb/>at the originating<lb/>judicatory any or all<lb/>of the above list according<lb/>to Judge's direction</note></p> <p>Scene the originating Judicatory.  <Add>If the<a/dd> Persons <del><gap/><lb/>whose instance</del> prised in the above list, <del>at whose</del> who are<lb/>they in whose instance attendance at this Judicatory shall<lb/>be appointed?  Answer. <add>Exceptions excepted</add> any or all according to <add>at</add> the discretion<lb/>of the Judge, guided by the reasons by here <sic>publicably <sic>alledged.</sic></p> <p>Exceptions are as above</p> <p><note>2<lb/>Exception 1 Addresses<lb/>of evidence elicitation<lb/>requiring letter</note></p> <p>Those persons, if any, in relation to whom for the purpose<lb/>of <add>their being subjected</add> oral examination as above, an <del>Eli</del> <add>Evidence</add> Elicitation requesting<lb/>letter has been or is about to be transmitted to the Judge of<lb/>an Incidental Judicatory.</p> <p><note>3<lb/>Exception 2. Interrogatees<lb/>by elicitation<lb/>none</note></p> <p>2. Those persons if any, to whom <add>respectively</add> for the purpose of their being<lb/>subjected to <del><gap/></del> interrogation in the epistolary mode, no Elicitation<lb/>paper has, as above been transmitted.</p> <p><note>4<lb/>Classes of persons in<lb/>relation to suits<lb/>1 Proposed <sic>Copursuers</sic><lb/>2 Proposed <sic>Codefendants</sic><lb/>3 Proposed Evidence holders</note></p> <p><del>Classes Pers</del> Classes deduced from the situation of the person<lb/>in relation to the suits.</p> <p>1. <del>Co</del> persons expected to become <sic>Copursuers</sic><lb/>2. <del>Defend</del> person expected to become Defendant or <sic>Codefendants</sic><lb/>3. Proposed Evidence holders, persons expected <add>regarded</add> to be able to<lb/>furnish evidence, personal, oral, or written.</p>
 
 


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 10:47, 27 August 2025

Click Here To Edit

1827. Novr. 5 +
Law Amendment.

ult
Propositions.
Ch Procedure
§

Scene Oral the originating Judicatory
on whose part
Individuals in whose nature attendance shall be appreciated
[Days and which in the instance as
shall be appointed ordered
]

1
persons whose
attendance required
at the originating
judicatory any or all
of the above list according
to Judge's direction

Scene the originating Judicatory. If the<a/dd> Persons
whose instance
prised in the above list, at whose who are
they in whose instance attendance at this Judicatory shall
be appointed? Answer. <add>Exceptions excepted
any or all according to at the discretion
of the Judge, guided by the reasons by here publicably <sic>alledged.

Exceptions are as above

2
Exception 1 Addresses
of evidence elicitation
requiring letter

Those persons, if any, in relation to whom for the purpose
of their being subjected oral examination as above, an Eli Evidence Elicitation requesting
letter has been or is about to be transmitted to the Judge of
an Incidental Judicatory.

3
Exception 2. Interrogatees
by elicitation
none

2. Those persons if any, to whom respectively for the purpose of their being
subjected to interrogation in the epistolary mode, no Elicitation
paper has, as above been transmitted.

4
Classes of persons in
relation to suits
1 Proposed Copursuers
2 Proposed Codefendants
3 Proposed Evidence holders

Classes Pers Classes deduced from the situation of the person
in relation to the suits.

1. Co persons expected to become Copursuers
2. Defend person expected to become Defendant or Codefendants
3. Proposed Evidence holders, persons expected regarded to be able to
furnish evidence, personal, oral, or written.



Identifier: | JB/056/231/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56.

Date_1

1827-11-05

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-4

Box

056

Main Headings

Law Amendment

Folio number

231

Info in main headings field

Law Amendment

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

C4 / E1

Penner

Watermarks

BROCKLESBY & MORBEY 1827

Marginals

George Bentham

Paper Producer

Edmund Henry Barker

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1827

Notes public

ID Number

18287

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in