JB/065/065/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/065/065/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/065/065/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/065/065/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1826. March 20<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Penal Code</head><note>Ch. 1. Offences affect<hi rend="superscript">g</hi> the person<lb/>
 
&sect. 7.  Mental vexation simple</note></p>
 
<p>If, in every case, in which it is produced,<lb/>
 
by the act of man, mental vexation were<lb/>
deemed wrongful, and, as such, made punishable<lb/>
<add>one consequence among others would be that</add> punishment would <del>thus be made to</del><lb/>
attach upon all competitors, and thus upon<lb/>
all human beings.  Sufficiently evident, in<lb/>
this view is the necessity of limitation.</p>
<p>Limitation to a certain extent would<lb/>
be applied by the application of the efficient<lb/>
causes of justification to mental, as under<lb/>
the last head, to corporal vexation.</p>
<p>Another demand for limitation<lb/>
will be seen produced by the several cases,<lb/>
in which the offence receives from some specifick<lb/>
<del>aggravation</del> <add>modificative</add> and in general <add>generally speaking</add> aggravative<lb/>
circumstance, a distinct denomination<lb/>
– witness the case of menacement.<lb/>
Still, however, much demand remains for ulterior limitation.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 04:45, 10 August 2025

Click Here To Edit

1826. March 20
Penal CodeCh. 1. Offences affectg the person
&sect. 7. Mental vexation simple

If, in every case, in which it is produced,
by the act of man, mental vexation were
deemed wrongful, and, as such, made punishable
one consequence among others would be that punishment would thus be made to
attach upon all competitors, and thus upon
all human beings. Sufficiently evident, in
this view is the necessity of limitation.

Limitation to a certain extent would
be applied by the application of the efficient
causes of justification to mental, as under
the last head, to corporal vexation.

Another demand for limitation
will be seen produced by the several cases,
in which the offence receives from some specifick
aggravation modificative and in general generally speaking aggravative
circumstance, a distinct denomination
– witness the case of menacement.
Still, however, much demand remains for ulterior limitation.


Identifier: | JB/065/065/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 65.

Date_1

1826-03-20

Marginal Summary Numbering

6-8

Box

065

Main Headings

Penal Code

Folio number

065

Info in main headings field

Penal Code

Image

001

Titles

Category

Copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

B2

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

George Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

20718

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in