JB/023/123/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/023/123/002: Difference between revisions

← Older editNewer edit →
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
10,212 edits
m Protected "JB/023/123/002": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
10,212 edits
mNo edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
<head>J.B. <del>against</del> to France against Death</head>  
<head>J.B. <del>against</del> to France against Death</head>  
<note>Death<lb/>
<note>Death<lb/>
9 Exe. <gap/><gap/></note><lb/>
9 <unclear>Execution</unclear></note><lb/>
<note>19<lb/>
<note>19<lb/>
Apt checks, what<lb/>
Apt checks, what<lb/>
1. When it would be <lb/>
1. When it would be <lb/>
groundless, obligation<lb/>
groundless, obligation<lb/>
to check and make<lb/>
to <unclear>check</unclear> and make<lb/>
known the evidence<lb/>
known the evidence<lb/>
as well as the fact</note><lb/>
as well as the fact</note><lb/>


<p>Now the these seen apt and sufficient restrain - what<lb/>
<p>Now the these seen apt and sufficient restrain - what<lb/>
are they? <hi rend="underline">Answer</hi>. In the case where by subsequented evidence<lb/>
are they? <hi rend="underline">Answer</hi>. In the case where by subsequential evidence<lb/>
the punishment it is shown would be inflated be groundless<lb/>
the punishment it is shown would if inflated be groundless<lb/>
the obligation of making known this same evidence: making it<lb/>
the obligation of making known this same evidence: making it<lb/>
<unclear>known</unclear> as effectually as the evidece in the grant of which the<lb/>
<unclear>known</unclear> as effectually as the evidence in the <unclear>ground</unclear> of which the<lb/>
order for the punishment was given or would have been given<lb/>
order for the punishment was given or would have been given,<lb/>
was made or could have been made known <gap/> <gap/>  <gap/><lb/>
was made or could have been made known <unclear>if made for</unclear><lb/>
the case when it is in the <add>supposition</add> account of its groundlessness that the<lb/>
the case when it is in the <add>supposition</add> account of its groundlessness that the<lb/>
punishment if <del><gap/></del></p>
punishment is <del>rem<gap/>ted</del></p>


<note>20<lb/>
<note>20<lb/>
Line 30: Line 30:
and made known<lb/>
and made known<lb/>
publicly given to make<lb/>
publicly given to make<lb/>
of the <hi rend="underline">facts</hi> <gap/><lb/>
of the <hi rend="underline">facts</hi> <unclear>viz</unclear><lb/>
1. Multitude of Codelinquents</note><lb/>
1. Multitude of Codelinquents</note><lb/>


<p>In the case where the ground is constituted by the multitude<lb/>
<p>In the case where the ground is constituted by the multitude<lb/>
of the offenders, there would be <add><add>the</add></add> necessity of stating the number of <lb/>
of the offenders, there would be <add>the</add> necessity of stating the number of <lb/>
<add>them, in</add> respect of each of who the elucidation and publication of the evidence<lb/>
<add>them, in</add> respect of each of whom the elucidation and publication of the evidence<lb/>
would be requisite: not in this case <del><gap/> <gap/></del> a licence<lb/>
would be requisite: not in this case <del><gap/> <gap/></del> a licence<lb/>
would be given for misuse in the case of <del>all those</del> every number<lb/>
would be given for misuse in the case of <del>all those</del> every number<lb/>
Line 41: Line 41:


<p>In the case where <del>thoug</del> it is by the supposed<lb/>
<p>In the case where <del>thoug</del> it is by the supposed<lb/>
disposition and <del>eff</del> <add>relative</add> state of the aff<gap/> on the part of the people<lb/>
disposition and <del>eff</del> <add>relative</add> state of the <unclear>affection</unclear> on the part of the people<lb/>
that the ground is established, the impeachability of <gap/><lb/>
that the ground is established, the impeachability of <gap/><lb/>
all cases and making public the appropriate body of evidence<lb/>
in all cases and making public the<add>an</add> appropriate body of evidence<lb/>
is  sufficiently <add><del><gap/></del></add> <del>appo</del> manifest: now less so is the <lb/>
is  sufficiently <add><del><gap/></del></add> <del>appo</del> manifest: now less so is the <lb/>
un<gap/>ed <del><gap/> <gap/></del> state of things would have place if it<lb/>
un<gap/>ed <del><gap/> <gap/></del> state of things would have place if it<lb/>
Line 50: Line 50:


<p>To the case where the disposition of some foreign power<lb/>
<p>To the case where the disposition of some foreign power<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> <add><gap/></add> is the object looked to <del>the same</del> this observation <add>will</add> <gap/><lb/>
<del><gap/></del> <add><gap/></add> is the object looked to <del>the same</del> this observation <add>will</add> make<lb/>
little difference will be found applicable.
little difference will be found applicable.
</p>
</p>
Line 57: Line 57:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 12:49, 1 May 2025

Click Here To Edit

1830 Nov. 16

J.B. against to France against Death Death
9 Execution
19
Apt checks, what
1. When it would be
groundless, obligation
to check and make
known the evidence
as well as the fact

Now the these seen apt and sufficient restrain - what
are they? Answer. In the case where by subsequential evidence
the punishment it is shown would if inflated be groundless
the obligation of making known this same evidence: making it
known as effectually as the evidence in the ground of which the
order for the punishment was given or would have been given,
was made or could have been made known if made for
the case when it is in the supposition account of its groundlessness that the
punishment is remted

20
Where the evidence
can not be elicited
and made known
publicly given to make
of the facts viz
1. Multitude of Codelinquents

In the case where the ground is constituted by the multitude
of the offenders, there would be the necessity of stating the number of
them, in respect of each of whom the elucidation and publication of the evidence
would be requisite: not in this case a licence
would be given for misuse in the case of all those every number
beyond the number particularised.

In the case where thoug it is by the supposed
disposition and eff relative state of the affection on the part of the people
that the ground is established, the impeachability of
in all cases and making public thean appropriate body of evidence
is sufficiently appo manifest: now less so is the
uned state of things would have place if it
were necessary to state whither it was the favour of the people
that were courted in this disfavour that were formed.

To the case where the disposition of some foreign power
is the object looked to the same this observation will make
little difference will be found applicable.




Identifier: | JB/023/123/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 23.

Date_1

1830-12-01

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

023

Main Headings

lord brougham displayed

Folio number

123

Info in main headings field

jb to belgians

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e9 / f18 / f11

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

street & co 1830

Marginals

Paper Producer

antonio alcala galiano

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1830

Notes public

ID Number

7994

Box Contents

Retrieved from "https://transcribe-bentham.ucl.ac.uk/index.php?title=JB/023/123/002&oldid=370434"
UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in