JB/056/201/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/056/201/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/056/201/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1827. <sic>Nov<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi></sic> 3<lb/>Law Amendment</head> <p><note><sic>ulto</sic><lb/>Propositions<lb/><sic>Ch.</sic> Procedure<lb/>&sect;.1 Beginning</note></p> <p><note>11<lb/>Under existing system a<lb/>number of judicatories<lb/>for eliciting one individual<lb/>fact</note></p> <p>That for eliciting the truth in relation to one and the same individual<lb/>matter of fact, the existing system has provided Judicatories<lb/>two three or four <del>with so</del> following <add>employing</add> <del>each of them</del> so many courses<lb/>of procedure altogether different: in some instance the choice<lb/>if left to the plaintiff which one of them he <del><gap/></del> will employ:<lb/>in other cases he is laid under the necessity of employing several<lb/>of them one after the other. <hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi> See below. <unclear>Prep.</unclear></p>
<head>1827. <sic>Nov<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi></sic> 3<lb/>Law Amendment</head> <p><note><sic>ulto</sic><lb/>Propositions.<lb/><sic>Ch.</sic> Procedure<lb/>&sect;.1 Beginning</note></p> <p><note>11<lb/>Under existing system a<lb/>number of judicatories<lb/>for eliciting one individual<lb/>fact</note></p> <p>That for eliciting the truth in relation to one and the same individual<lb/>matter of fact, the existing system has provided Judicatories<lb/>two three or four <del>with so</del> following <add>employing</add> <del>each of them</del> so many courses<lb/>of procedure altogether different: in some instance the choice<lb/>is left to the plaintiff which one of them he <del><gap/></del> will employ:<lb/>in other cases he is laid under the necessity of employing several<lb/>of them one after the other. <hi rend="superscript">(a)</hi> See below. <unclear>Prep.</unclear></p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 14:26, 9 June 2025

Click Here To Edit

1827. Novr. 3
Law Amendment

ulto
Propositions.
Ch. Procedure
§.1 Beginning

11
Under existing system a
number of judicatories
for eliciting one individual
fact

That for eliciting the truth in relation to one and the same individual
matter of fact, the existing system has provided Judicatories
two three or four with so following employing each of them so many courses
of procedure altogether different: in some instance the choice
is left to the plaintiff which one of them he will employ:
in other cases he is laid under the necessity of employing several
of them one after the other. (a) See below. Prep.



Identifier: | JB/056/201/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56.

Date_1

1827-11-03

Marginal Summary Numbering

11

Box

056

Main Headings

Law Amendment

Folio number

201

Info in main headings field

Law Amendment

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

D3 / E3

Penner

Watermarks

BROCKLESBY & MORBEY 1827

Marginals

George Bentham

Paper Producer

Edmund Henry Barker

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1827

Notes public

ID Number

18257

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in