JB/002/456/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/002/456/002: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
<head>From p.9.</head>
<head>From p.9.</head>
<p>Yet betwixt Man and Boy and Man, there <lb/>will in some ages be, to the purpose of economy<lb/> as above mentioned, <del>be no</del> little or no difference<lb/> <add>since</add> for a <del>man</del> <add>boy</add> of 20 will earn quite as much<lb/> as a man of 21: whereas between Boy <lb/>and Boy there may in this respect be a <lb/>difference of no less than 1000 or 2000 per<lb/> Cent. A Boy of 4 year old shall earn <lb/> 6 <hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> a week: a Boy of 20 year old <add>shall</add> nine <lb/>or ten shillings: <add><sic>whih</sic> for</add> a Boy of 4 year old, if he earn <lb/>any thing, <del>no more than</del> 6<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi>, will be full pay. </p>   
<p>Yet betwixt Man and Boy and Man, there <lb/>will in some ages be, to the purpose of economy<lb/> as above mentioned, <del>be no</del> little or no difference<lb/> <add>since</add> for a <del>man</del> <add>boy</add> of 20 will earn quite as much<lb/> as a man of 21: whereas between Boy <lb/>and Boy there may in this respect be a <lb/>difference of no less than 1000 or 2000 per<lb/> Cent. A Boy of 4 year old shall earn <lb/> 6 <hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> a week: a Boy of 20 year old <add>shall</add> nine <lb/>or ten shillings: <add><sic>whih</sic> for</add> a Boy of 4 year old, if he earn <lb/>any thing, <del>no more than</del> 6<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi>, will be full pay. </p>   
<!-- previous paragraph has been crossed out -->
<!-- previous paragraph has been crossed out -->
<p>The lights that have been thrown on<lb/> the subject of Pauper Economy in so<lb/> many <add>important</add> points of view, by the industry and<lb/> public spirit of different gentlemen whose<lb/> <sic>labours</sic> have been made public, are <add>present <add><del>have</del></add></add> worthy <lb/><add>a well <sic>earnt</sic> title to public gratitude:</add> of every acknowledgment: but in this <add>article</add> particular<lb/> they have failed us: for what had <del>not</del> <add>never</add> been <lb/><del><gap/></del> noted <del>can</del> <add>could</add> not be communicated. The <lb/><hi rend='underline'>Censuses</hi> that have been given of the Pauper community in <add>from a number of</add> different Parishes excite our regrets<lb/> <add>on this score,</add> without satisfying our wants: for, in perhaps every <hi rend='underline'>Census,</hi> though in many <del>or ev</del> instances, <add><del>the</del></add> ages<lb/> have been mentioned with a sufficient degree of particularity,<lb/> yet in other <add>instances in the same list</add> age having been omitted <lb/>or "family" <del>specified</del> spoken of in <add>no other than in the aggregate</add> general terms without<lb/> much as an intimation of the number of <add>the</add> members <del>of which</del> <!-- sentence continues in the margin --> <del>which it was composed</del>, the whole list has, to the purpose here in question been by these <unclear>further</unclear> <!-- edge of paper is missing --> omissions rendered useless.</p>  
<p>The lights that have been thrown on<lb/> the subject of Pauper Economy in so<lb/> many <add>important</add> points of view, by the industry and<lb/> public spirit of different gentlemen whose<lb/> <sic>labours</sic> have been made public, are <add>present <add><del>have</del></add></add> worthy <lb/><add>a well <sic>earnt</sic> title to public gratitude:</add> of every acknowledgment: but in this <add>article</add> particular<lb/> they have failed us: for what had <del>not</del> <add>never</add> been <lb/><del><gap/></del> noted <del>can</del> <add>could</add> not be communicated. The <lb/><hi rend='underline'>Censuses</hi> that have been given of the Pauper community in <add>from a number of</add> different Parishes excite our regrets<lb/> <add>on this score,</add> without satisfying our wants: for, in perhaps every <hi rend='underline'>Census,</hi> though in many <del>or ev</del> instances, <add><del>the</del></add> ages<lb/> have been mentioned with a sufficient degree of particularity,<lb/> yet in other <add>instances in the same list</add> age having been omitted <lb/>or "family" <del>specified</del> spoken of in <add>no other than in the aggregate</add> general terms without<lb/> much as an intimation of the number of <add>the</add> members <del>of which</del> <!-- sentence continues in the margin --> <del>which it was composed</del>, the whole list has, to the purpose here in question been by these <unclear>further</unclear> <!-- edge of paper is missing --> omissions rendered useless.</p>  



Revision as of 10:03, 17 February 2012

File:JB 002 456 002.jpg

scalentis A hypothesis 5 From p.9.

Yet betwixt Man and Boy and Man, there
will in some ages be, to the purpose of economy
as above mentioned, be no little or no difference
since for a man boy of 20 will earn quite as much
as a man of 21: whereas between Boy
and Boy there may in this respect be a
difference of no less than 1000 or 2000 per
Cent. A Boy of 4 year old shall earn
6 d a week: a Boy of 20 year old shall nine
or ten shillings: whih for a Boy of 4 year old, if he earn
any thing, no more than 6d, will be full pay.


The lights that have been thrown on
the subject of Pauper Economy in so
many important points of view, by the industry and
public spirit of different gentlemen whose
labours have been made public, are present <add>have</add> worthy
a well earnt title to public gratitude: of every acknowledgment: but in this article particular
they have failed us: for what had not never been
noted can could not be communicated. The
Censuses that have been given of the Pauper community in from a number of different Parishes excite our regrets
on this score, without satisfying our wants: for, in perhaps every Census, though in many or ev instances, the ages
have been mentioned with a sufficient degree of particularity,
yet in other instances in the same list age having been omitted
or "family" specified spoken of in no other than in the aggregate general terms without
much as an intimation of the number of the members of which which it was composed, the whole list has, to the purpose here in question been by these further omissions rendered useless.




Identifier: | JB/002/456/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 2.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

18

Box

002

Main Headings

annuity notes

Folio number

456

Info in main headings field

art. 20

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

a41 / f55

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

1195

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in