JB/096/059/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/059/003: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:


<p>contradict: are to be transgressed if they attempt it: <lb/>  
<p>contradict: are to be transgressed if they attempt it: <lb/>  
this must not be forgotten: <note> <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> particularly concerning this must not be forgotten: <note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> particularly concerning those <del>f</del> against hanging in chains; and <unclear>pardon g</unclear> men convict of murder.</note>  And this is our <lb/>Author's notion of the defense due and in this country<lb/> to the Law given to the Jews: (for amongst the <lb/>Laws called <del>altogether</del> all together God's Laws <lb/> he makes no distinctions): <hi rend='superscript'>++</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>++</hi> A Right Reverend Father of our Church thinks differently: that <add>a</add> Law; <del>he calls it,</del> <add>in which, as</add> <del>in which together</del> <add>everything</add> <del>is <gap/></del> with most justice, I will not say, or consistency, he observes "every thing is extraordinary </note>   
this must not be forgotten: <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi><note> <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> particularly concerning this must not be forgotten: <note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> particularly concerning those <del>f</del> against hanging in chains; and pardoning men convict of murder.</note>  And this is our <lb/>Author's notion of the <sic>defence</sic> due in this country<lb/> to the Law given to the Jews: (for amongst the <lb/>Laws called <del>altogether</del> all together God's Laws <lb/> he makes no distinctions): <hi rend='superscript'>++</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>++</hi> A Right Reverend Father of our Church thinks differently: that <add>a</add> Law; <del>he calls it,</del> <add>in which, as</add> <del>in which together</del> <add>everything</add> <del>is <gap/></del> with most justice, I will not say, or consistency, he observes "every thing is extraordinary </note>  <del>that a Law, in which, as<lb/> Bishop <gap/> <gap/> most justice &amp; without<lb/> less <gap/> observance, <gap/></del> "extraordinary<lb/> and which ought not to be proposed for<lb/> "example, any more than for imitation." It is for<lb/> the reader to judge which he will side with, the<lb/> theological politician, or the political divine.</p>   


And this is our
 
<lb/>
 
Author's notion of the deference due in this country
<del>that Law in which, as
<lb/>
to the Law given to the Jews: (for amongst the
<lb/>Laws called <del>altogether</del> all together God's Laws
<lb/>
he makes no distinctions): <note>A Right Reverend Father of our Church thinks differently: that <add>a</add> Law; <del>he calls it</del> <add>in which as</add> <del>in which he <gap/> <add>everything</add> is</del> with most justice, I will not say or consistency, he observes "every thing is extraordinary
</note> <del>that Law in which, as
<lb/>  
<lb/>  
Bishop <gap/> with most justice I will not say
Bishop <gap/> with most justice I will not say

Revision as of 23:03, 23 February 2012

Click Here To Edit

SECT. III. Divine Law. (3)

contradict: are to be transgressed if they attempt it:
this must not be forgotten: + + particularly concerning this must not be forgotten: <note>+ particularly concerning those f against hanging in chains; and pardoning men convict of murder. And this is our
Author's notion of the defence due in this country
to the Law given to the Jews: (for amongst the
Laws called altogether all together God's Laws
he makes no distinctions): ++ ++ A Right Reverend Father of our Church thinks differently: that a Law; he calls it, in which, as in which together everything is with most justice, I will not say, or consistency, he observes "every thing is extraordinary that a Law, in which, as
Bishop most justice & without
less observance,
"extraordinary
and which ought not to be proposed for
"example, any more than for imitation." It is for
the reader to judge which he will side with, the
theological politician, or the political divine.


that Law in which, as


Bishop with most justice I will not say
observe every extraordinary,
and which ought not to be proposed for
example, any more than for imitation." It is for
the reader to judge which he will side with, the
theological politician, or the political divine.
Here our Author differs from a Bishop: the more's
the pity: we shall now see him differing from
more than a Bishop: we shall see him differing

from Locke.


"Undoubtedly" says our author "the revealed Law is (humanly speaking)"
(a particular sort of speaking, I suppose) of
"infinitely more authority than what we generally
"call the natural Law. Because one is the
"Law of Nature, expressly declared so to be by God
"himself; the other is only, what by the assistance
"of human reason, we imagine to be that Law.
"If we could be as certain of the latter, as of
"of the former, both would have an equal authority:
when two come together "but till then" (which, we are to understand, is, never)



Identifier: | JB/096/059/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

comment on the commentaries

Folio number

059

Info in main headings field

sect. iii divine law

Image

003

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f6 / d7 / f8 / d9

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31063

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in