★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/095/058/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/095/058/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
''This | <!-- The top left and lower bottom right sections of this page have been cut away. Transcription starts at the top right quarter. --><p> <head>122 ff 15 <!-- symbol --> 47</head>twin: in the 47<hi rend='superscript'>th</hi> the option is put of the question. </p> <p> <head>13 ff 13</head> I know not from what stupidity [it <sic>happend,</sic> that after <lb/>reading this Section] I continued for a long time <add> <gap/> myself with "when</add> professed <lb/> with a notion, <add> which continued with one a long which </add> from observing the pains taken <lb/> to insert after "Calves" the words "alive or <sic>slaughter'd</sic> <lb/> that the other amounts mentioned were not to <lb/> be within the indulgence, but in a living state: <add> at last ></add> upon <lb/> closer inspection, I considered that <del> Calves </del> <hi rend='underline'>Poultry</hi> was <lb/> not the less Poultry for being <del> killed </del> <add> dead </add>, <hi rend='underline'>Rabbits</hi>the <lb/> less rabbits, nor Fish the less Fish not even good <lb/> red herring for being dried & salted, (although <add> notwithstanding </add> the proverb <lb/> honoursit with a denomination apart <add> to itself </add> ) but that <lb/> <del> labour </del> <add> what was </add> when alive a Calf by being killed or <del> at </del> <lb/> <del> last </del> cut up, <add> at least <!-- symbol --></add> <note> <add> <!-- symbol --> without such a word as "<sic><hi rend='underline'>slaughter'd</hi></sic> " to prevent it </add> </note> is <del> changed </del> <add> <dele> turned </del> </add> metamorphosed </add> into Veal - This being <add> difficult form of </add> <lb/> cleared up, I must still acknowledge <add> confess </add> myself to be in <add> a little </add> <lb/> <del> great distress about <gap/> others. </del> <add> embarassed to find an answer to <add> <gap/> </add> <del> several </del> other questions <lb/>1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> Whether A carriage could be said to have Calves <add> a single Calf in it, much <lb/> <del> in it </del> <add> less "Calves" </add> either "<hi rend='underline'>alive or <sic>slaughter'd</sic></hi>" if every Calf <lb/> <del> had lost for example its <del> <add> wanted a </add> Head for example, with <lb/> the Pluck &c <del> before it was put in: </del> </p><pb/><!-- start of bottom left quarter --><p> <head>123 ff 13</head> 2<hi rend='superscript'>dly</hi>Whether Lambs tho' there were ever so many of them <lb/> would not, the instant the Breath wasout of their body, <lb/> lose their <hi rend='underline'><gap/></hi> & become "Lamb" upon the same principle <lb/> that Calves after the like Catastrophe, become <lb/> Veal? </p> <p> 3<hi rend='superscript'>dly</hi> Whether it be by accident or design, that Sheep <lb/> & Mutton, Oxen & Beef,Deer & Venison, both Welsh <lb/>& English were excluded from the indulgence? <del> of being </del> <lb/> <del> <gap/> </del> </p> <p> If by accident, the words "Fish, Flesh, <add> or </add> Fowl, " <!-- symbol --> <note> <add> <!-- symbol -->to which might be added if thought necessaryu the words "<hi rend='underline'>alive or dead</hi>" </hi> (The <lb/> the distinctions between the <gap/> be not very well defined) <lb/> might it should seem be substituted to those in question <lb/> with advantage. I <unclear>remembered</unclear> not to insert them in <lb/>the Draught, <del> least </del> <add> not knowing but that </add> the exceptions which they exclude <lb/> might have might have been amde in code for some good reason <lb/> tho' unknown to me. </p> <!-- next paragraph is encircled with a box --> <p> if <add> howevere </add> the beasts areused than Horses, all these <lb/> difficulties are at end: for <del> Waggons </del> <add> it is only when </add> drawn by Horses <lb/> that <add> the </add> Waggons in question are subjected to the restriction. </add></p> <p> So the Words "Animal provision" there might be this <lb/> objection (besides that <del> it is rather too informative the <lb/> <gap/> <add> is scarce familiar enough </add </p> <pb/><!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | |||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
122 ff 15 47twin: in the 47th the option is put of the question.
13 ff 13 I know not from what stupidity [it happend, that after
reading this Section] I continued for a long time myself with "when professed
with a notion, which continued with one a long which from observing the pains taken
to insert after "Calves" the words "alive or slaughter'd
that the other amounts mentioned were not to
be within the indulgence, but in a living state: at last > upon
closer inspection, I considered that Calves Poultry was
not the less Poultry for being killed dead , Rabbitsthe
less rabbits, nor Fish the less Fish not even good
red herring for being dried & salted, (although notwithstanding the proverb
honoursit with a denomination apart to itself ) but that
labour what was when alive a Calf by being killed or at
last cut up, at least without such a word as "slaughter'd " to prevent it is changed <dele> turned metamorphosed </add> into Veal - This being difficult form of
cleared up, I must still acknowledge confess myself to be in a little
great distress about others. embarassed to find an answer to <add> several other questions
1st Whether A carriage could be said to have Calves a single Calf in it, much
in it <add> less "Calves" either "alive or slaughter'd" if every Calf
had lost for example its wanted a Head for example, with
the Pluck &c before it was put in:
---page break---
123 ff 13 2dlyWhether Lambs tho' there were ever so many of them
would not, the instant the Breath wasout of their body,
lose their & become "Lamb" upon the same principle
that Calves after the like Catastrophe, become
Veal?
3dly Whether it be by accident or design, that Sheep
& Mutton, Oxen & Beef,Deer & Venison, both Welsh
& English were excluded from the indulgence? of being
If by accident, the words "Fish, Flesh, or Fowl, " <note> to which might be added if thought necessaryu the words "alive or dead" </hi> (The
the distinctions between the be not very well defined)
might it should seem be substituted to those in question
with advantage. I remembered not to insert them in
the Draught, least <add> not knowing but that the exceptions which they exclude
might have might have been amde in code for some good reason
tho' unknown to me.
if howevere the beasts areused than Horses, all these
difficulties are at end: for Waggons it is only when drawn by Horses
that the Waggons in question are subjected to the restriction. </add>
So the Words "Animal provision" there might be this
objection (besides that it is rather too informative the
<add> is scarce familiar enough </add
---page break---
|
Identifier: | JB/095/058/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 95. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
095 |
|||
|
058 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[partial gr crown motif] [partial lion with vryheyt motif]]] |
||
|
30944 |
|||
