★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/100/005/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/100/005/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
''This | <head>Place and Time<lb/> N<hi rend='superscript'>o</hi> I</head> | ||
<p> <hi rend='superscript'>(a)</hi> M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Hume observes with great ingenuity<lb/> and seemingly with great truth that a law <lb/>to this <unclear>prospect</unclear> is more likely to have the<lb/> contrary effect than that which is here supposed<lb/> to be intended.</p> | |||
---- | |||
<head>N<hi rend='superscript'>o II</hi></head> | |||
<p><hi rend='superscript'>(b)</hi> This distinction is in truth the great<lb/> stumbling block of <add>a certain class of</add> <del>laws </del> writers. The question<lb/> of fact and the question of <gap/> are continually <add>incessantly</add> <lb/>confounded. Sometimes it is the<lb/> <del>fo</del> latter that is <unclear>prest</unclear> for the former: of this<lb/> an example may be seen in Sir W. <sic>Blackstone's</sic><lb/> Commentaries. See Frag. on Government. <lb/> Ch. <unclear> First</unclear>. More frequently the former for the latter: <lb/>as in the instances quoted above from <sic>Monseignier</sic>. The books that have been written<lb/> on the pretended Law of nature have scarce <lb/>any other foundation than this mistake. There<lb/> are accordingly two sorts of propositions which are<lb/> given <add>produced</add> indiscriminately under the character of <lb/> laws of nature: the one declaring how things are, <lb/> | |||
<add>the</add> | |||
</p> | |||
Place and Time
No I
(a) Mr Hume observes with great ingenuity
and seemingly with great truth that a law
to this prospect is more likely to have the
contrary effect than that which is here supposed
to be intended.
No II
(b) This distinction is in truth the great
stumbling block of a certain class of laws writers. The question
of fact and the question of are continually incessantly
confounded. Sometimes it is the
fo latter that is prest for the former: of this
an example may be seen in Sir W. Blackstone's
Commentaries. See Frag. on Government.
Ch. First. More frequently the former for the latter:
as in the instances quoted above from Monseignier. The books that have been written
on the pretended Law of nature have scarce
any other foundation than this mistake. There
are accordingly two sorts of propositions which are
given produced indiscriminately under the character of
laws of nature: the one declaring how things are,
the
|
Identifier: | JB/100/005/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 100. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
100 |
influence of time and place |
||
|
005 |
place and time |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
f1 / f2 / f3 / f4 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]] |
||
|
32021 |
|||
