JB/070/001/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/070/001/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/070/001/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/070/001/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
The Law of England, say the <unclear>writers</unclear>, has<lb/>two branches: there are two parts of it,<lb/>the written and the unwritten. <note>When they say this, what is it that they mean?</note><add>By</add><hi rend='underline'>The</hi><lb/><hi rend='underline'>Law</hi>, <add>for it</add> to have any signification, should mean<lb/>a collection of Articles of each of which<lb/>one may say, that it is <hi rend='underline'>a Law</hi>. <del>This</del><add>A</add><lb/>signification <unclear>thus</unclear>, which the written park of<lb/>it actually has, as every one may <gap/><lb/>Now then with <del>the</del> respect to that part that<lb/>is <unclear>termed</unclear> unwritten. This then, being still<lb/>the Law, should consist of a number<lb/> of <add>like</add> Articles of each of which it may be said,<lb/> that it is, a Law. Where then is that<lb/>one article in it, of which <add>a <gap/></add><del><gap/>deleted text</del>can say so? Let any one produce it.<lb/> This <del>at least should not be a <gap/>not <gap/><lb/></del><add>is a <unclear>lash</unclear> which one should at least expect<lb/> to be fulfilled by</add>those writers who with so much<lb/><gap/><unclear>profess</unclear> to <unclear>back</unclear> <del>what Law</del>what<pb/>a Law is, and what in particular the Laws<lb/> of England.
 




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 11:15, 8 September 2010

Click Here To Edit

The Law of England, say the writers, has
two branches: there are two parts of it,
the written and the unwritten. When they say this, what is it that they mean?ByThe
Law, for it to have any signification, should mean
a collection of Articles of each of which
one may say, that it is a Law. ThisA
signification thus, which the written park of
it actually has, as every one may
Now then with the respect to that part that
is termed unwritten. This then, being still
the Law, should consist of a number
of like Articles of each of which it may be said,
that it is, a Law. Where then is that
one article in it, of which a deleted textcan say so? Let any one produce it.
This at least should not be a not
is a lash which one should at least expect
to be fulfilled by
those writers who with so much
profess to back what Lawwhat
---page break---
a Law is, and what in particular the Laws
of England.



Identifier: | JB/070/001/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 70.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

070

Main Headings

Folio number

001

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

letter 114, vol 1

ID Number

23116

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in