JB/116/143/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/116/143/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/116/143/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/116/143/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>24 July 1802<lb/> N. S. Wales<lb/> 9</head>


<p>what mode <del>of a</del> which of the two modes of acquisition<lb/> did the King come by his right? Not in this case <lb/>surely by purchase, <add>by descent, and not by <del>purchase</del></add> but by descent, occupancy or<lb/> any other mode of purchase: unless <add>in this view</add> it be contended, <lb/>that possessing them by descent he sent them out <lb/>to New South Wales that when there stationed <add><gap/> down</add><lb/> upon the ground which he had obtained by occupancy, <lb/>they might be ready <add>in readiness</add> to be seized, and being there <lb/> possessed by the better title <hi rend='underline'>occupancy</hi>, they might be <lb/><del>ready</del> <add>in readiness</add> to be converted by him to his own use by<lb/> being <unclear>flayed</unclear>, and imprisoned and kept to hard<lb/> labour without redress from those <add>that law</add> laws <del>of that country</del><lb/> [the protection of which he had contrived <add>of the protection of which he had <sic>rushd</sic> them </add> then to make them <lb/>forfeit] by sending them out of the country governed by <add>it.</add> <lb/><del>that law.</del> This <add><gap/></add> is most unquestionably the <add>fact: the</add> plain matter<lb/> of fact: it would be impossible to deny it, but in<lb/> what respect it will serve M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Pitt no point of law <lb/>is a question <add>that remains</add> to be determined by the proper judges. </p>
 




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 19:14, 29 October 2012

Click Here To Edit

24 July 1802
N. S. Wales
9

what mode of a which of the two modes of acquisition
did the King come by his right? Not in this case
surely by purchase, by descent, and not by purchase but by descent, occupancy or
any other mode of purchase: unless in this view it be contended,
that possessing them by descent he sent them out
to New South Wales that when there stationed down
upon the ground which he had obtained by occupancy,
they might be ready in readiness to be seized, and being there
possessed by the better title occupancy, they might be
ready in readiness to be converted by him to his own use by
being flayed, and imprisoned and kept to hard
labour without redress from those that law laws of that country
[the protection of which he had contrived of the protection of which he had rushd them then to make them
forfeit] by sending them out of the country governed by it.
that law. This is most unquestionably the fact: the plain matter
of fact: it would be impossible to deny it, but in
what respect it will serve Mr Pitt no point of law
is a question that remains to be determined by the proper judges.




Identifier: | JB/116/143/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116.

Date_1

1802-07-24

Marginal Summary Numbering

7 continued

Box

116

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

143

Info in main headings field

n. s. wales

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e9

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

37676

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in