JB/116/017/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/116/017/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Petergh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/116/017/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/116/017/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
 
Of this so much agitated <del><gap/></del> this so universally <del>appr</del> <del><unclear>commended</unclear></del> <add>approved <add>accepted</add><lb/>
principle &#x2014; <del>approved</del> <add>accepted</add> at least in its application to<lb/>
the conveyance of <del>men in their unhappy circumstances</del> <add>the subjects of that trade</add> what<lb/>
use, what application was made in the adjustment of the<lb/>
Contracts for the conveyance of British subjects to<lb/>
New South Wales? The contracts <add>themselves,</add> the contracts alone, were<lb/>
they for this purpose to be called for by Parliament, would<lb/>
<add>serve to</add> shew. It would then be seen &#x2014; supposing <del>any difference</del> <add>the deficiency if any</add><lb/>
in <del>the degree</del> <add>point of</add> <unclear>case</unclear>, to be the result not of financial design<lb/>
but of honest negligence - it would then be seen, whether<lb/>
the <del>d</del> difference between a white skin and a black one<lb/>
were, <add>or were not,</add> an interval too wide for such powers of abstraction<lb/>
as the Treasury at that time afforded, to <del><gap/> <add><gap/></add> <unclear>stretch</unclear></del><lb/>
<del><unclear>their</unclear> <unclear>rations</unclear> to</del> measure and <gap/>. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 





Revision as of 13:29, 29 May 2012

Click Here To Edit


Of this so much agitated this so universally appr commended approved <add>accepted
principle — approved accepted at least in its application to
the conveyance of men in their unhappy circumstances the subjects of that trade what
use, what application was made in the adjustment of the
Contracts for the conveyance of British subjects to
New South Wales? The contracts themselves, the contracts alone, were
they for this purpose to be called for by Parliament, would
serve to shew. It would then be seen — supposing any difference the deficiency if any
in the degree point of case, to be the result not of financial design
but of honest negligence - it would then be seen, whether
the d difference between a white skin and a black one
were, or were not, an interval too wide for such powers of abstraction
as the Treasury at that time afforded, to stretch
their rations to measure and .














Identifier: | JB/116/017/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116.

Date_1

1802-10-13

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

116

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

017

Info in main headings field

panopt. v. n. s. wales

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

37550

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in