JB/070/059/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/070/059/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Justintonra (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/070/059/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/070/059/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>INTERPRETATION Judicial</head>
 
<p>there is a great deal of difference between an<lb/>
Interpretation which supplies, &amp; an Interpretation<lb/>
which <hi rend='underline'>applies</hi> <add>ascertains</add>. &#x2014; An Interpretation which<lb/>
adds a special <add>specific</add> term to <sic>compleat</sic> the deficiency<lb/>
of a term meant to be <hi rend='underline'>general</hi> (If, as <del><gap/></del> is supposed<lb/>
to exlude, the specific term added, along<lb/>
with the rest) and an interpretation which from<lb/>
the subject matter &amp; context, takes occasion<lb/>
to fix the sense of a general term which standing<lb/>
singly would appear vague &amp; undefinable.<lb/>
The latter mode of interpretation must always<lb/>
be <sic>allow'd</sic> to the <gap/> power: the former,<lb/>
never an unproved system <add>state</add>
of Legislature<lb/>
<unclear>composition</unclear>, might it should run be <del>deemed</del> <add>taken</add><lb/>
<del>its</del> <add>away</add> Thus suppose to the word Parish were<lb/>
subjoined the words or <unclear><add>re</add></unclear> correspondent <add>[valuable]</add> division:<lb/>
this might without difficulty be <sic>allowd</sic> to be<lb/>
construed by a Court to mean <add><gap/> to</add> Extraparochial<lb/>
Plan, where from the subject amtter it should<lb/>
appear that <del><unclear>plans</unclear></del> <add>districts</add> of the kind last mentioned
 
should upon the same reason as those of the<lb/>
other &#x2014; But to extend the word Parish <del>alone</del><lb/>
standing by itself to <del><gap/></del> <add><gap/></add> extraparochial this<lb/>
seems a stretch beyond what is necessary to be allowed in such a state of things as is above<lb/>
supposed.</p>


<p><gap/> was indeed in the infancy of this <unclear>Note</unclear><lb/>
of Legislation, where this &amp; much more <add>greater <gap/></add>, was<lb/>
not only admissible, but necessary.</p>


<head>LAWS Construction of</head>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 14:53, 6 September 2010

Click Here To Edit

INTERPRETATION Judicial

there is a great deal of difference between an
Interpretation which supplies, & an Interpretation
which applies ascertains. — An Interpretation which
adds a special specific term to compleat the deficiency
of a term meant to be general (If, as is supposed
to exlude, the specific term added, along
with the rest) and an interpretation which from
the subject matter & context, takes occasion
to fix the sense of a general term which standing
singly would appear vague & undefinable.
The latter mode of interpretation must always
be allow'd to the power: the former,
never an unproved system state of Legislature
composition, might it should run be deemed taken
its away Thus suppose to the word Parish were
subjoined the words or re correspondent [valuable] division:
this might without difficulty be allowd to be
construed by a Court to mean to Extraparochial
Plan, where from the subject amtter it should
appear that plans districts of the kind last mentioned should upon the same reason as those of the
other — But to extend the word Parish alone
standing by itself to extraparochial this
seems a stretch beyond what is necessary to be allowed in such a state of things as is above
supposed.

was indeed in the infancy of this Note
of Legislation, where this & much more greater , was
not only admissible, but necessary.

LAWS Construction of



Identifier: | JB/070/059/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 70.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

070

Main Headings

of laws in general

Folio number

059

Info in main headings field

interpretation judicial laws construction of

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] [lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23174

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in