JB/116/328/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/116/328/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
ChrisRiley (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Dispensing power</head>
 
<p>7 Apr 1812</p>
 
<note>Note<lb/>1. Illegality</note>
<p>would not be to <del>sent out</del> be committed to the <add>County</add> Gaol of any<lb/>
other County nor to any other Gaol but <add>would be</add> must<lb/>
neither be to be sent <add>directly</add> from trial aboard ship in order<lb/>
to be transported or if there were no such ship in<lb/>
readiness to receive him in that case but in<lb/>
that only he might be capable of being <del><gap/></del> consigned<lb/>
to <hi rend="underline">a</hi> or <hi rend="underline">the</hi> Penitentiary House. But the restriction<lb/>
imposed by these words is a restriction that<lb/>
does not exist in law. The King <add>according to</add> by a rule of common<lb/>
Law has the power of choosing the Gaol in which<lb/>
each Convict shall from time to time be confined.<lb/>
This power <add>had actually</add> actually has been exercised under <add>in</add> under his Majesty's<lb/>
name by the Duke himself&#x2014;I mean in<lb/>
<del>under</del> in particular in the instance of the State<lb/>
prisoners; Convicts and others: and whether it could<lb/>
have been the intention of the Duke to impose on his<lb/>
own power destruction not imposed on it by Law<lb/>
and restrictions the only object of which <add>could</add> would have<lb/>
been the counteracting his own declared wishes and<lb/>
intentions, may be inferred from the disposition manifested<lb/>
by him in respect to the obligations really imposed upon<lb/>
him by law.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 17:13, 18 November 2015

Click Here To Edit

Dispensing power

7 Apr 1812

Note
1. Illegality

would not be to sent out be committed to the County Gaol of any
other County nor to any other Gaol but would be must
neither be to be sent directly from trial aboard ship in order
to be transported or if there were no such ship in
readiness to receive him in that case but in
that only he might be capable of being consigned
to a or the Penitentiary House. But the restriction
imposed by these words is a restriction that
does not exist in law. The King according to by a rule of common
Law has the power of choosing the Gaol in which
each Convict shall from time to time be confined.
This power had actually actually has been exercised under in under his Majesty's
name by the Duke himself—I mean in
under in particular in the instance of the State
prisoners; Convicts and others: and whether it could
have been the intention of the Duke to impose on his
own power destruction not imposed on it by Law
and restrictions the only object of which could would have
been the counteracting his own declared wishes and
intentions, may be inferred from the disposition manifested
by him in respect to the obligations really imposed upon
him by law.



Identifier: | JB/116/328/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116.

Date_1

1802-07-09

Marginal Summary Numbering

20-21

Box

116

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

328

Info in main headings field

n. s. wales

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

b16 / b4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

37861

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in