★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>23 Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 1802</head> | |||
<head>Letter 3</head> | |||
<note>XVII Hulk <gap/><lb/> | |||
Hulk <gap/><lb/> | |||
King<lb/> | |||
King</note> | |||
<p>Would it be of any use to Parliament to be ignorant of the<lb/> | |||
hand by which its authority has been <gap/> in &c</p> | |||
<p>Is it required of a man that he should remain without<lb/> | |||
speech or <gap/> for fear of injury <add>dislodging</add> the arrow by which his<lb/> | |||
<gap/> has been pierced.<p> | |||
<p>Can there be a particle of hope so long <del>as</del> the <gap/><lb/> | |||
by which that letter was dictated nor <gap/> to without<lb/> | |||
remorse?</p> | |||
<p>These things are <gap/> called jobs: were there ever <gap/> a<lb/> | |||
transaction to which the appellative was with more manifest<lb/> | |||
properly applied?</p> | |||
<p>The Inspector of Hulks <del>has</del> depends for his existence<lb/> | |||
<del>in</del> that character on the non-existence of the Penitentiary<lb/> | |||
establishment. <gap/> <gap/> more <gap/>: The Gentleman who <add>His official friend</add><lb/> | |||
recommended him to Your Lordship has thus gained a natural<lb/> | |||
ally - has intrusted himself <gap/> deep.</p> | |||
<p>Who was recommended? Was it Sir <gap/> Mildman? Was it<lb/> | |||
Mr Neild? Was it any body who <del>had <gap/> established the <gap/></del> <add>be any <gap/> could be <gap/></add><lb/> | |||
discovered to have taken any the smallest particle of which in the<lb/> | |||
<gap/> of public <gap/> in any <gap/> who had distinguished himself<lb/> | |||
on any occasion by zeal in that particular branch public<lb/> | |||
service - by any degree of acquaintance with it - that had given<lb/> | |||
<gap/> the smallest <gap/> of intelligence any judge <add>the smallest</add> of <del><gap/></del> his<lb/> | |||
<add>zeal</add> modesty in this <gap/>. In Mr Neild Your Lordship might<lb/> | |||
have found a Gentleman who had devoted his life and fortune<lb/> | |||
to that <add>eccentric and heroic</add> line of public service: who had travelled the Kingdom<lb/> | |||
over and over again in search of objects of <del>beneficence</del> this brightest<lb/> | |||
<add>and purest</add> branch of clarity: who ever <del>the</del> <gap/> of this plan has at<lb/> | |||
his own <gap/> performed a journey of 700 miles on the <gap/><lb/> | |||
<gap/>: in a word a <gap/> <gap/>.</p> | |||
<p>I could have pointed <lb/> | |||
Your Lordship of <add>to</add> another person who would have accepted the <add>have gained nothing</add><lb/> | |||
office <add>though he might cost you more</add> - not upon the actual <gap/> but for a salary not to</p> | |||
<note>the very gentleman<lb/> | |||
from whom <add>active <del>but</del> <gap/></add> <del>Your Lordship</del><lb/> | |||
<gap/> Your Lordship had<lb/> | |||
received information of<lb/> | |||
the very abuse.<lb/> | |||
Had Your Lordship<lb/> | |||
<gap/> <add><gap/></add> to either of these<lb/> | |||
Gentlemen to beg his acceptance<lb/> | |||
of it, the condescension<lb/> | |||
would have been<lb/> | |||
a tonne of <gap/> <add>real</add> glory,<lb/> | |||
a subject of much pride.</note> | |||
23 Decr 1802 Letter 3
XVII Hulk
Hulk
King
King
Would it be of any use to Parliament to be ignorant of the
hand by which its authority has been in &c
Is it required of a man that he should remain without
speech or for fear of injury dislodging the arrow by which his
has been pierced.
Can there be a particle of hope so long as the
by which that letter was dictated nor to without
remorse?
These things are called jobs: were there ever a
transaction to which the appellative was with more manifest
properly applied?
The Inspector of Hulks has depends for his existence
in that character on the non-existence of the Penitentiary
establishment. more : The Gentleman who His official friend
recommended him to Your Lordship has thus gained a natural
ally - has intrusted himself deep.
Who was recommended? Was it Sir Mildman? Was it
Mr Neild? Was it any body who had established the be any could be
discovered to have taken any the smallest particle of which in the
of public in any who had distinguished himself
on any occasion by zeal in that particular branch public
service - by any degree of acquaintance with it - that had given
the smallest of intelligence any judge the smallest of his
zeal modesty in this . In Mr Neild Your Lordship might
have found a Gentleman who had devoted his life and fortune
to that eccentric and heroic line of public service: who had travelled the Kingdom
over and over again in search of objects of beneficence this brightest
and purest branch of clarity: who ever the of this plan has at
his own performed a journey of 700 miles on the
: in a word a .
I could have pointed
Your Lordship of to another person who would have accepted the have gained nothing
office though he might cost you more - not upon the actual but for a salary not to
the very gentleman
from whom active but Your Lordship
Your Lordship had
received information of
the very abuse.
Had Your Lordship
to either of these
Gentlemen to beg his acceptance
of it, the condescension
would have been
a tonne of real glory,
a subject of much pride.
|
Identifier: | JB/116/511/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1802-12-23 |
6 |
||
|
116 |
panopticon versus new south wales |
||
|
511 |
letter 3 |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e7 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
38044 |
|||
