★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/116/639/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/116/639/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
''This | 56<lb/><lb/>to M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Neild? The negative is but too <del>nor</del> notorious.<lb/>If in one of the two instances situation in life was<lb/>such as to exclude hope of acceptance, that could <del>b</del><lb/>not be the case in the other.<lb/><lb/>Thirty years ago the indefatigable & gratuitous<lb/>Agent of the Charity for the relief of debtors, travelled<lb/>the first of circuits three years before even Howard<lb/>had begun his. I called Neild a second Howard:<lb/>with more propriety I called Howard a second Neild.<lb/>Howard sunk under a jail fever, Neild has survived<lb/>one. The exertrions of Howard have long since received<lb/>their quietus from above: Neilds seem but to in-<lb/>-crease with age. Two such circuits in one year<lb/>adorn the annals of 1802. This Honourable Colleague<lb/>— a Member of the legislature and not an idle one —<lb/>a man standing already in full light — would derive<lb/>nothing like illustration from a hand like mine.<lb/><lb/>In a station like Your Lordships there have<lb/>been men that would have knelt to both these<lb/>gentlemen rather than not have gained one of them<lb/>for the office. In the instance of M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Neild at<lb/>any rate, whether he would or would not have<lb/>accepted of the office would not be known, to a<lb/>certainty at least, without asking: accordingly he<lb/>was not asked. The experiment would have been<lb/>too dangerous: it was a case not to be trifled with.<lb/>Seeing how he had been occupying himself, and what<lb/>he lived for, would any prudent man have an-<lb/>-swered for his non-acceptance? <del>Yeer</del> Year after<lb/>year his active beneficence had embraced and covered the | ||
56
to Mr Neild? The negative is but too nor notorious.
If in one of the two instances situation in life was
such as to exclude hope of acceptance, that could b
not be the case in the other.
Thirty years ago the indefatigable & gratuitous
Agent of the Charity for the relief of debtors, travelled
the first of circuits three years before even Howard
had begun his. I called Neild a second Howard:
with more propriety I called Howard a second Neild.
Howard sunk under a jail fever, Neild has survived
one. The exertrions of Howard have long since received
their quietus from above: Neilds seem but to in-
-crease with age. Two such circuits in one year
adorn the annals of 1802. This Honourable Colleague
— a Member of the legislature and not an idle one —
a man standing already in full light — would derive
nothing like illustration from a hand like mine.
In a station like Your Lordships there have
been men that would have knelt to both these
gentlemen rather than not have gained one of them
for the office. In the instance of Mr Neild at
any rate, whether he would or would not have
accepted of the office would not be known, to a
certainty at least, without asking: accordingly he
was not asked. The experiment would have been
too dangerous: it was a case not to be trifled with.
Seeing how he had been occupying himself, and what
he lived for, would any prudent man have an-
-swered for his non-acceptance? Yeer Year after
year his active beneficence had embraced and covered the
Identifier: | JB/116/639/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
116 |
panopticon versus new south wales |
||
639 |
|||
002 |
|||
correspondence |
2 |
||
recto |
d55 / d56 |
||
john herbert koe |
1800 |
||
1800 |
|||
letter was never sent; see note 8 to letter 1747, vol. 7, and note 4 to letter 1824, vol. 7 |
38172 |
||