JB/073/034/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/073/034/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
<head>THEFT - Definition - Content of Owner</head> <lb/>
<head>THEFT - Definition - Content of Owner</head> <lb/>


*6  G.3  48  1<lb/><p>In fact it is the absence of this circumstance<lb/> &amp; not the obscure jargon<lb/> about the <unclear>amicus furandi</unclear> which <add>the usual</add>  Acts<lb/> of Parliament have assumed <add>for</add> as the <gap/><lb/> of criminiality in their description<lb/>of this offence - I mean those Acts (which<lb/> will be more particularly considered hereafter)<lb/> made for <unclear>foregoing</unclear> in the several subject <lb/> matters of property with the Law's<lb/> protection against the crime <add>offence</add> which <add>had been</add> were<lb/> excluded <add>from it</add> by the original <add>narrow</add> provisions of<lb/> the Common Law.<lb/></p> <p>But this <add><gap/></add> as we have seen is is <del>but <gap/></del> insufficient<lb/> when the only one; the other of <lb/>the absence of <hi rend='underline'>"<unclear>Protince</unclear> of Title"</hi>is omitted<lb/> in those which have an <gap/><lb/> prefixed<lb/></p><!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
*6  G.3  48  1<lb/><p>In fact it is the absence of this circumstance<lb/> &amp; not the obscure jargon<lb/> about the <unclear>amicus furandi</unclear> which <add>the usual</add>  Acts<lb/> of Parliament have assumed <add>for</add> as the <unclear>intention</unclear><lb/> of criminality in their description<lb/>of this offence - I mean those Acts (which<lb/> will be more particularly considered hereafter)<lb/> made for <unclear>foregoing</unclear> in the several subject <lb/> matters of property with the Law's<lb/> protection against the crime <add>offence</add> which <add>had been</add> were<lb/> excluded <add>from it</add> by the original <add>narrow</add> provisions of<lb/> the Common Law.<lb/></p> <p>But this <add><gap/></add> as we have seen is is <del>but <gap/></del> insufficient<lb/> when the only one; the other of <lb/>the absence of <hi rend='underline'>"<unclear>Protince</unclear> of Title"</hi>is omitted<lb/> in those which have an <gap/><lb/> prefixed<lb/></p><!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 13:36, 1 May 2012

Click Here To Edit

THEFT - Definition - Content of Owner

  • 6 G.3 48 1

    In fact it is the absence of this circumstance
    & not the obscure jargon
    about the amicus furandi which the usual Acts
    of Parliament have assumed for as the intention
    of criminality in their description
    of this offence - I mean those Acts (which
    will be more particularly considered hereafter)
    made for foregoing in the several subject
    matters of property with the Law's
    protection against the crime offence which had been were
    excluded from it by the original narrow provisions of
    the Common Law.

    But this as we have seen is is but insufficient
    when the only one; the other of
    the absence of "Protince of Title"is omitted
    in those which have an
    prefixed


Identifier: | JB/073/034/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 73.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

073

Main Headings

law in general

Folio number

034

Info in main headings field

theft definition consent of owner

Image

001

Titles

Category

rudiments sheet (brouillon)

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[partial lion with vryheyt motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23874

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in