JB/116/611/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/116/611/001: Difference between revisions

Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/116/611/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/116/611/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
11-May-2012: under construction by Diane Folan.  Please do not amend.




Line 11: Line 8:
<p><note>XVII Improved Prisons</note><!-- note in pencil -->  whole of South Britain would have been £10,275,250
<p><note>XVII Improved Prisons</note><!-- note in pencil -->  whole of South Britain would have been £10,275,250
<lb/>
<lb/>
<gap/> upon the proposed Panopticon plan &amp; scale £2,357,000
D<hi rend='superscript'>o</hi> upon the proposed Panopticon plan &amp; scale £2,357,000
<lb/>
<lb/>
Waste being the amount of the difference}
Waste being the amount of the difference}
<lb/>
<lb/>
waste though altogether blameless &amp; <unclear>unpreventible</unclear><!-- check whether 'unpreventible' or 'unpreventable' -->} £7,918,250
waste though altogether blameless &amp; unpreventible} £7,918,250
<lb/>
<lb/>
Two thousand to a house was the number  
Two thousand to a house was the number  
Line 29: Line 26:
million &#x2014; the amount of the waste upon that
million &#x2014; the amount of the waste upon that
<lb/>
<lb/>
single article &#x2014;  
single article &#x2014; would have been frugality , in
<lb/>
comparison of the waste aimed at by M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Pitt. &#x2014;
<lb/></p>


<p><!-- indented -->This upon main buildings alone .
<lb/>
total of the estimated part of the <sic>expence</sic>}
<lb/>
upon this plan , Main buildings , Airing} <!-- white space -->£ 
<lb/>
grounds , and Official establishment} <!-- the following amount is to the right of the bracket, between this line and the one below --> 22,459,561
<lb/>
together &#x2014; Annual amount of official establishments}
<lb/>
(to match with the other}
<lb/>
<sic>expences</sic>) reduced to capital viz at 20 years}
<lb/>
purchase &#x2014; &#x2014; &#x2014; &#x2014; &#x2014; &#x2014; &#x2014;}
<lb/>
Deduct <sic>expence</sic> of d<hi rend='superscript'>o</hi> on the Panopticon}
<lb/>
scale and plan &#x2014; &#x2014; &#x2014; &#x2014; &#x2014; &#x2014;} <hi rend='underline'>6,022,000</hi><!-- positioned between the two lines, above -->
<lb/>
Remains for the amount of waste on this
<lb/>
part of the aggregate of <sic>expence</sic> upon this
<lb/>
plan , frugal as it would have been in } 16,437,561
<lb/>
comparison of M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Pitt's &#x2014; &#x2014; &#x2014;
<lb/></p>


<p>In round numbers sixteen millions and a half
<lb/>
out of two and twenty millions and a half the
<lb/>
waste by having ten establishments instead of one .  <add>Wasteful</add>
<lb/></p>
<lb/></p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 20:14, 11 May 2012

Click Here To Edit


14 Letter 3d

XVII Improved Prisons whole of South Britain would have been £10,275,250
Do upon the proposed Panopticon plan & scale £2,357,000
Waste being the amount of the difference}
waste though altogether blameless & unpreventible} £7,918,250
Two thousand to a house was the number
upon the Panopticon plan and scale : two
hundred in round numbers upon the Suffolk
scale : but upon Mr Pitt's plan they would have
been of all manner of smaller sizes . The eg eight
million — the amount of the waste upon that
single article — would have been frugality , in
comparison of the waste aimed at by Mr Pitt. —

This upon main buildings alone .
total of the estimated part of the expence}
upon this plan , Main buildings , Airing} £
grounds , and Official establishment} 22,459,561
together — Annual amount of official establishments}
(to match with the other}
expences) reduced to capital viz at 20 years}
purchase — — — — — — —}
Deduct expence of do on the Panopticon}
scale and plan — — — — — —} 6,022,000
Remains for the amount of waste on this
part of the aggregate of expence upon this
plan , frugal as it would have been in } 16,437,561
comparison of Mr Pitt's — — —

In round numbers sixteen millions and a half
out of two and twenty millions and a half the
waste by having ten establishments instead of one . Wasteful



Identifier: | JB/116/611/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

116

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

611

Info in main headings field

letter 3d

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d14

Penner

john herbert koe

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

letter was never sent; see note 8 to letter 1747, vol. 7

ID Number

38144

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in