★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>PROCEDURE 40.</head><lb/> <p>.. And yet I am almost tempted <lb/> to imagine that it was not <gap/> of Chamberlain<lb/> intended <del>we</del> it <add>even not</add> "because <unclear>D Burns </unclear><lb/> <note>Constable </note><lb/>by not insisting it <add><gap/> collusion </add> among <del>the</del> <lb/> <gap/> has made of it.<lb/></p> <note>To Constables belong Sect. Art...& c</note> <lb/><p>Duties imposed by various Statutes<lb/> has not inserted this and <unclear>27</unclear><lb/> Because had they been meant <lb/> as fair an opportunity would<lb/>hardly have been neglected of amplification<lb/> the least we should have had <add>upon the subject so would have been</add> as Churchwarden or Churchwarden <gap/> and<lb/> concurs of and for the poor of the<lb/> Parish, Hamlet or Place"</p> <pb/> <head>PROCEDURE <unclear>17</unclear> 72 SS 57</head><lb/> <p><del>It is then expected <add><gap/></add> that</del> <del><add>as</add></del> <add>a</add> Party prosecuted<lb/> <del>shall not </del> <add>never</add> go</p><lb/><head>PROCEDURE 18. SS <add>53</add> 53, 34, 43, 33</head><lb/> <p>By the 53. SS an Action of Debt is given, <del>but</del> for<lb/> every penalty & by | <head>PROCEDURE 40.</head><lb/> <p>.. And yet I am almost tempted <lb/> to imagine that it was not <gap/> of Chamberlain<lb/> intended <del>we</del> it <add>even not</add> "because <unclear>D Burns </unclear><lb/> <note>Constable </note><lb/>by not insisting it <add><gap/> collusion </add> among <del>the</del> <lb/> <gap/> has made of it.<lb/></p> <note>To Constables belong Sect. Art...& c</note> <lb/><p>Duties imposed by various Statutes<lb/> has not inserted this and <unclear>27</unclear><lb/> Because had they been meant <lb/> as fair an opportunity would<lb/>hardly have been neglected of amplification<lb/> the least we should have had <add>upon the subject so would have been</add> as Churchwarden or Churchwarden <gap/> and<lb/> concurs of and for the poor of the<lb/> Parish, Hamlet or Place"</p> <pb/> <head>PROCEDURE <unclear>17</unclear> 72 SS 57</head><lb/> <p><del>It is then expected <add><gap/></add> that</del> <del><add>as</add></del> <add>a</add> Party prosecuted<lb/> <del>shall not </del> <add>never</add> go</p><lb/><head>PROCEDURE 18. SS <add>53</add> 53, 34, 43, 33</head><lb/> <p>By the 53. SS an Action of Debt is given, <del>but</del> for<lb/> <note>DEBT James Butler</note> <lb/>every penalty & by this....? for the particular <lb/> penalty imposed by that Section, but in neither <lb/> placeis the common provision made for claims,<lb/> that species of Action of it's debilitating appendages <add>Yet they are ousted in the 34th as to that Section only tho' not in that immedaitely preceeding 33 when the sanction is least wanted because <hi rend='underline'>Case</hi> is given n. again 43</add> <lb/> <del>upon</del> a recognizance with sufficient surities <lb/> has been entered into, is but reasonable & proper <lb/> but <del>by</del> must this by all means be done at the<lb/> very time of conviction?</p><pb/> Is not this too commodious an opportunity for a <lb/> corrupt magistrate to work oppression entrenched<lb/> behind the letter of the Law? or indeed can<lb/> a scrupulous tho' honest Magistrate do otherwise<lb/> than work opposition <del><gap/></del> under this chance<lb/> <del>which in effect takes away Appeal which<lb/><unclear> N</unclear> seems to regulate it.</del> <add>which takes away Appeal in effect, what it regulates it in appearance</add> conf. 56<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
PROCEDURE 40.
.. And yet I am almost tempted
to imagine that it was not of Chamberlain
intended we it even not "because D Burns
Constable
by not insisting it collusion among the
has made of it.
To Constables belong Sect. Art...& c
Duties imposed by various Statutes
has not inserted this and 27
Because had they been meant
as fair an opportunity would
hardly have been neglected of amplification
the least we should have had upon the subject so would have been as Churchwarden or Churchwarden and
concurs of and for the poor of the
Parish, Hamlet or Place"
---page break---
PROCEDURE 17 72 SS 57
It is then expected that as a Party prosecuted
shall not never go
PROCEDURE 18. SS 53 53, 34, 43, 33
By the 53. SS an Action of Debt is given, but for
DEBT James Butler
every penalty & by this....? for the particular
penalty imposed by that Section, but in neither
placeis the common provision made for claims,
that species of Action of it's debilitating appendages Yet they are ousted in the 34th as to that Section only tho' not in that immedaitely preceeding 33 when the sanction is least wanted because Case is given n. again 43
upon a recognizance with sufficient surities
has been entered into, is but reasonable & proper
but by must this by all means be done at the
very time of conviction?
---page break---
Is not this too commodious an opportunity for a
corrupt magistrate to work oppression entrenched
behind the letter of the Law? or indeed can
a scrupulous tho' honest Magistrate do otherwise
than work opposition under this chance
which in effect takes away Appeal which
N seems to regulate it. which takes away Appeal in effect, what it regulates it in appearance conf. 56
|
Identifier: | JB/095/102/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 95. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
095 |
|||
|
102 |
procedure ix |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
30988 |
|||
