JB/051/312/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/051/312/003: Difference between revisions

Jancopes (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


3<lb/><head>C. Pr.</head><lb/><head>Of the [purposes] of Procedure</head><lb/><note><head>End</head></note><lb/><lb/>1<lb/>In giving an analysis of the several of-<lb/><note>Connection of<lb/>this title with<lb/>that of offences<lb/>against Justice</note><lb/>-fences against Justice we were unavoidably <sic>lead</sic><lb/>at that early period to exhibit the several<lb/>ends or purposes of the system of Procedure.<lb/>of criminal Procedure as well as civil. For<lb/>those offences could be neither more nor less<lb/>than so many ways of counter-acting those<lb/>purposes. In stating therefore those offences<lb/>and those purposes we have already given<lb/>a summary sketch of <del>all</del> the several reasons<lb/>on one <add>or</add>another of which every provision of<lb/>procedure must be grounded.<lb/><lb/>2.<lb/>Here then a new system of reasons<lb/><note>The <hi rend='underline'>reasons</hi> will<lb/>here take another<lb/>shape.</note><lb/>comes into play: <add>upon the stage:</add> consistent with indeed and de-<lb/>-pendent on but still different from the former.<lb/>The business of the former set was to show either<lb/>that <add>the</add> punishment <add>in the case in question</add> was improper or that it was<lb/>proper: and if proper, that <del>it was proper</del> in<lb/>such or such <del>a</del> <add>was the proper</add> quantity <del>and</del> and such or<lb/>such the proper mode. The business <add>purport</add> of the<lb/>set <add>of reasons</add> that now assumes the lead is to show that<lb/>such and such is the way to provide officially for
<head>3</head>
<head>C. Pr.</head>
<head>Of the [purposes] of Procedure</head>
 
 
<head>1</head>
 
<p>In giving an analysis of the several offences<lb/> <note>Connection of this title with that of offences against Justice</note><lb/>against Justice we were unavoidably <sic>lead</sic><lb/>at that early period to exhibit the several<lb/>ends or purposes of the system of Procedure.<lb/>of criminal Procedure as well as civil. For<lb/>those offences could be neither more nor less<lb/>than so many ways of counter-acting those<lb/>purposes. In stating therefore those offences<lb/>and those purposes we have already given<lb/>a summary sketch of <del>all</del> the several reasons<lb/>on one <add>or</add>another of which every provision of<lb/>procedure must be grounded.</p>
 
<head>2.</head>
<p>Here then a new system of reasons<lb/><note>The <hi rend='underline'>reasons</hi> will<lb/>here take another<lb/>shape.</note><lb/>comes into play: <add>upon the stage:</add> consistent with indeed and dependent<lb/> on but still different from the former.<lb/>The business of the former set was to show either<lb/>that <add>the</add> punishment <add>in the case in question</add> was improper or that it was<lb/>proper: and if proper, that <del>it was proper</del> in<lb/>such or such <del>a</del> <add>was the proper</add> quantity <del>and</del> and such or<lb/>such the proper mode. The business <add>purport</add> of the<lb/>set <add>of reasons</add> that now assumes the lead is to show that<lb/>such and such is the way to provide officially for</p>





Revision as of 16:31, 7 June 2012

Click Here To Edit

3 C. Pr. Of the [purposes] of Procedure


1

In giving an analysis of the several offences
Connection of this title with that of offences against Justice
against Justice we were unavoidably lead
at that early period to exhibit the several
ends or purposes of the system of Procedure.
of criminal Procedure as well as civil. For
those offences could be neither more nor less
than so many ways of counter-acting those
purposes. In stating therefore those offences
and those purposes we have already given
a summary sketch of all the several reasons
on one oranother of which every provision of
procedure must be grounded.

2.

Here then a new system of reasons
The reasons will
here take another
shape.

comes into play: upon the stage: consistent with indeed and dependent
on but still different from the former.
The business of the former set was to show either
that the punishment in the case in question was improper or that it was
proper: and if proper, that it was proper in
such or such a was the proper quantity and and such or
such the proper mode. The business purport of the
set of reasons that now assumes the lead is to show that
such and such is the way to provide officially for




Identifier: | JB/051/312/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-3, 1-4

Box

051

Main Headings

evidence; procedure code

Folio number

312

Info in main headings field

purposes of procedure

Image

003

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1 / f2 / f3 / f4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::s. lay [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

alexander mavrokordatos

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

16477

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in