JB/116/146/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/116/146/001: Difference between revisions

Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:




14-Jun-2012: under construction by Diane Folan.  Please do not amend.
18-Jun-2012: under construction by Diane Folan.  Please do not amend.




Line 30: Line 30:
a part of his subjects <del>going</del> withdrawing themselves
a part of his subjects <del>going</del> withdrawing themselves
<lb/>
<lb/>
for this purpose to a distant country ,
for this purpose to a distant country , remote from the
<lb/>
eye of Parliament ,to oust Parliament <del><gap/></del> <del>of its legislative</del> <add>of its right of</add>
<lb/>
<del>powers over them</del>  <del>to withdraw them out of the</del>
<lb/>
<del>no nor plan them under the authority of any laws due</del>
<lb/>
<del>were made by him with or without their concurrence by
<lb/>
them with or without his concurrence</del>  If it had , it
<lb/>
could as more Laws entered into their conception that it
<lb/>
was on the power of the King in confederacy with a thousand
<lb/>
of his subjects collected all over the kingdom from
<lb/>
<del>different</del> <add>various</add> towns and places including or not including
 
 
 
 





Revision as of 22:19, 18 June 2012

Click Here To Edit


18-Jun-2012: under construction by Diane Folan. Please do not amend.


This distraction between human beings on the one
hand , and stocks and stones in the other , I can not
help looking upon , my Lord, as a distraction that
has its ground in nature , [and common sense .] Unfortunately
to this it never seems to have made obtained
its way to entrance into the minds of lawyers . If it had , either
they must have agreed from first to last on denying
Clark's case to be law — or [+] they must have agreed in
looking upon it as untenable . If it it
could never have into their conception that
it was in the power of the King by a confederacy with
a part of his subjects going withdrawing themselves
for this purpose to a distant country , remote from the
eye of Parliament ,to oust Parliament of its legislative of its right of
powers over them to withdraw them out of the
no nor plan them under the authority of any laws due
were made by him with or without their concurrence by
them with or without his concurrence
If it had , it
could as more Laws entered into their conception that it
was on the power of the King in confederacy with a thousand
of his subjects collected all over the kingdom from
different various towns and places including or not including





Identifier: | JB/116/146/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116.

Date_1

1802-07-24

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

116

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

146

Info in main headings field

n. s. wales

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[monogram] 1800]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

37679

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in