JB/116/146/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/116/146/001: Difference between revisions

Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:




18-Jun-2012: under construction by Diane Folan.  Please do not amend.
06-Jul-2012: under construction by Diane Folan.  Please do not amend.




<p>This distraction between human beings on the one
<head>24 July 1802</head><!-- aligned to the left-hand margin, and in pencil -->
<head>N. S. Wales  <note>Conduct</note></head><!-- roughly centred, and in pencil -->
<head>3  <note>111 Non - <gap/>-proved</note><!-- in pencil --></head>
 
<p><!-- indented -->This distraction between human beings on the one
<lb/>
<lb/>
hand , and stocks and stones in the other , I can not
hand , and stocks and stones in the other , I can not
Line 20: Line 24:
they must have agreed from first to last on denying
they must have agreed from first to last on denying
<lb/>
<lb/>
Clark's case to be law &#x2014; or <add>[+]</add> they must have agreed in
Clark's case to be law &#x2014; or <add>[+]</add> <note><add>[+]</add> from the first <gap/> to starting of the question of the <sic>Kings</sic> right of legislation over Colonies , mediately or immediately makes no sort of <gap/> &#x2014;</note> they must have agreed in
<lb/>
<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> looking upon it as untenable .  If it <gap/> it
<del><gap/></del> looking upon it as untenable .  If it <gap/> it
Line 32: Line 36:
for this purpose to a distant country , remote from the
for this purpose to a distant country , remote from the
<lb/>
<lb/>
eye of Parliament ,to oust Parliament <del><gap/></del> <del>of its legislative</del> <add>of its right of</add>
eye of Parliament , to oust Parliament <del><gap/></del> <del>of its legislative</del> <add>of its right of</add>
<lb/>
<lb/>
<del>powers over them</del>  <del>to withdraw them out of the</del>
<del>powers over them</del>  <del>to withdraw them out of the</del>
Line 49: Line 53:
<lb/>
<lb/>
<del>different</del> <add>various</add> towns and places including or not including  
<del>different</del> <add>various</add> towns and places including or not including  
 
<lb/>
 
S<hi rend='superscript'>t</hi> Alban's , to set up a right of legislating without
 
<lb/>
 
Parliament , by going out of England <add>[+]</add> <note><add>[+]</add> to Virginia or Maryland</note> then <del>over</del> <add>in confederacy with</add> a thousand
 
<lb/>
 
of his subjects collected in S<hi rend='superscript'>t</hi> <sic>Albans</sic> and still staying <add>continuing</add>
 
<lb/>
<lb/></p>
in S<hi rend='superscript'>t</hi> Alban's .
 
<p>
 
<lb/></p>
<lb/></p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 06:34, 6 July 2012

Click Here To Edit


06-Jul-2012: under construction by Diane Folan. Please do not amend.


24 July 1802 N. S. Wales Conduct 3 111 Non - -proved

This distraction between human beings on the one
hand , and stocks and stones in the other , I can not
help looking upon , my Lord, as a distraction that
has its ground in nature , [and common sense .] Unfortunately
to this it never seems to have made obtained
its way to entrance into the minds of lawyers . If it had , either
they must have agreed from first to last on denying
Clark's case to be law — or [+] [+] from the first to starting of the question of the Kings right of legislation over Colonies , mediately or immediately makes no sort of they must have agreed in
looking upon it as untenable . If it it
could never have into their conception that
it was in the power of the King by a confederacy with
a part of his subjects going withdrawing themselves
for this purpose to a distant country , remote from the
eye of Parliament , to oust Parliament of its legislative of its right of
powers over them to withdraw them out of the
no nor plan them under the authority of any laws due
were made by him with or without their concurrence by
them with or without his concurrence
If it had , it
could as more Laws entered into their conception that it
was on the power of the King in confederacy with a thousand
of his subjects collected all over the kingdom from
different various towns and places including or not including
St Alban's , to set up a right of legislating without
Parliament , by going out of England [+] [+] to Virginia or Maryland then over in confederacy with a thousand
of his subjects collected in St Albans and still staying continuing
in St Alban's .



Identifier: | JB/116/146/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116.

Date_1

1802-07-24

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

116

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

146

Info in main headings field

n. s. wales

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[monogram] 1800]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

37679

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in