★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/116/146/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/116/146/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
Line 24: | Line 21: | ||
they must have agreed from first to last on denying | they must have agreed from first to last on denying | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
Clark's case to be law — or <add>[+]</add> <note><add>[+]</add> from the first <gap/> to starting of the question of the <sic>Kings</sic> right of legislation over Colonies , mediately or immediately makes no sort of | Clark's case to be law — or <add>[+]</add> <note><add>[+]</add> from the first <gap/><!-- looks like 'rain' or 'vain' ? --> to starting of the question of the <sic>Kings</sic> right of legislation over Colonies , mediately or immediately makes no sort of difference —</note> they must have agreed in | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
<del><gap/></del> looking upon it as untenable . If it < | <del><gap/></del> looking upon it as untenable . If it <unclear>find</unclear> it | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
could never have | could never have entered into their conception that <del>the</del> | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
it was in the power of the King by <gap/> <add>a confederacy</add> with | it was in the power of the King by <gap/> <add>a confederacy</add> with | ||
Line 38: | Line 35: | ||
eye of Parliament , to oust Parliament <del><gap/></del> <del>of its legislative</del> <add>of its right of</add> | eye of Parliament , to oust Parliament <del><gap/></del> <del>of its legislative</del> <add>of its right of</add> | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
<del>powers over them</del> | <del>powers over them</del> <add>legislating <del>over</del> <add>upon</add> them</add> <del>to withdraw them out of <add>the</add></del> <add>I mean as was meant in Clark's case</add> | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
<del>no nor plan them under the authority of any laws due</del> | <del>no nor plan them under the authority of any laws due</del> <add>not the <hi rend='underline'>concurrent</hi> divinity but the exclusive right ,</add> | ||
<lb/> | <lb/> | ||
<del>were made by him with or without their concurrence by | <del>were made by him with or without their concurrence by |
24 July 1802
N. S. Wales Conduct
3 111 Non - -proved
This distraction between human beings on the one
hand , and stocks and stones in the other , I can not
help looking upon , my Lord, as a distraction that
has its ground in nature , [and common sense .] Unfortunately
to this it never seems to have made obtained
its way to entrance into the minds of lawyers . If it had , either
they must have agreed from first to last on denying
Clark's case to be law — or [+] [+] from the first to starting of the question of the Kings right of legislation over Colonies , mediately or immediately makes no sort of difference — they must have agreed in
looking upon it as untenable . If it find it
could never have entered into their conception that the
it was in the power of the King by a confederacy with
a part of his subjects going withdrawing themselves
for this purpose to a distant country , remote from the
eye of Parliament , to oust Parliament of its legislative of its right of
powers over them legislating over <add>upon them</add> to withdraw them out of the I mean as was meant in Clark's case
no nor plan them under the authority of any laws due not the concurrent divinity but the exclusive right ,
were made by him with or without their concurrence by
them with or without his concurrence If it had , it
could as more Laws entered into their conception that it
was on the power of the King in confederacy with a thousand
of his subjects collected all over the kingdom from
different various towns and places including or not including
St Alban's , to set up a right of legislating without
Parliament , by going out of England [+] [+] to Virginia or Maryland then over in confederacy with a thousand
of his subjects collected in St Albans and still staying continuing
in St Alban's .
Identifier: | JB/116/146/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1802-07-24 |
|||
116 |
panopticon versus new south wales |
||
146 |
n. s. wales |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
e3 |
||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[monogram] 1800]] |
||
1800 |
|||
37679 |
|||