★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
</head> | </head> | ||
<p>But why says somebody <del>start</del> put such extreme <lb/>cases? why <add>what informer can be drawn from</add> start such improbably suppositions thus <lb/>improbable. Under a government <add>constitution</add> such as ours,<lb/> can a <del>t</del> man pretend to entertain any serious apprehension<lb/> of a <add> | <p>But why says somebody <del>start</del> put such extreme <lb/>cases? why <add>what informer can be drawn from</add> start such improbably suppositions thus <lb/>improbable. Under a government <add>constitution</add> such as ours,<lb/> can a <del>t</del> man pretend to entertain any serious apprehension<lb/> of a <add><sic>Bastile</sic></add> <sic>Bastile</sic>? I answer <del>true</del>: hitherto,<lb/> <add>not:</add> scan the <foreign>Habeas Corpus</foreign> Act no such apprehensions <lb/>have in general been entertained. But why? because<lb/> there <add>stands — there has stood</add> all along has been the <foreign>Habeas Corpus</foreign> <lb/>Act: and, no such construction as that contended against having <add>ever</add> been put upon it, it has been regarded<lb/> — <del>and has</del> regarded by every body — as commensurate<lb/> to the mischief — as sufficient for the prevention<lb/> of it. But, upon the construction contended against<lb/> it is <add>would</add> no longer <add>be</add> commensurate to the mischief. <add>On that construction</add> At this<lb/> moment these <unclear>crests</unclear>, for these fourteen years there has<lb/> <add>been existing</add> existed a <sic>Bastile</sic>; and New South Wales is that<lb/> <sic>Bastile</sic>. The <del>o cla</del> As yet indeed it is not yet open <lb/>for the reception of all comers. <add>For</add> The descriptions alone <lb/>can it as yet be made to | ||
26 Jun 03
(10
But why says somebody start put such extreme
cases? why what informer can be drawn from start such improbably suppositions thus
improbable. Under a government constitution such as ours,
can a t man pretend to entertain any serious apprehension
of a Bastile Bastile? I answer true: hitherto,
not: scan the Habeas Corpus Act no such apprehensions
have in general been entertained. But why? because
there stands — there has stood all along has been the Habeas Corpus
Act: and, no such construction as that contended against having ever been put upon it, it has been regarded
— and has regarded by every body — as commensurate
to the mischief — as sufficient for the prevention
of it. But, upon the construction contended against
it is would no longer be commensurate to the mischief. On that construction At this
moment these crests, for these fourteen years there has
been existing existed a Bastile; and New South Wales is that
Bastile. The o cla As yet indeed it is not yet open
for the reception of all comers. For The descriptions alone
can it as yet be made to
Identifier: | JB/116/385/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1803-01-24 |
|||
116 |
scotch reform |
||
385 |
|||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
e10 |
||
jeremy bentham |
1800 |
||
1800 |
|||
37918 |
|||