JB/098/025/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/098/025/003: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/098/025/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/098/025/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<pb/>
 
<head>C 17</head>
 
<head>Of Co-offenders</head>
 
<p><note>1</note> guarding <add>screening</add> him in the first instance from detection, and<lb/>
finally from punishment. In this stage the offence in<lb/>
question <sic>co-incides</sic> with <del>cri</del> offences against Justice:<lb/>
and may be committed in a variety of ways, such<lb/>
as by harbouring the offender, maintaining him, concealing<lb/>
him, <note>furnishing him with assistance or information to enable him to elude detection or pursuit.</note> defending him against the officers of Justice<lb/>
rescuing him if <add>already</add> seized by them. <del>already</del> <add><!-- in red ink -->To p. 25. N<hi rend='superscript'>o</hi> 4</add></p>
 
<head><!-- in pencil -->52</head>
 
<p><add><!-- in red ink -->From p. 30 N<hi rend='superscript'>o</hi> 1</add> <note><!-- number in red -->2 Reason for examining which <del>the principal</del> offender, <add>if any ought to</add> <del>and who accomplices</del>be <sic>stiled</sic> the principal, and which accomplices</note> <del>Thus much for the description of the several</del><lb/>
<del>sorts of offences that <add>are are</add> <gap/> the acts of different</del><lb/>
<del>persons and may stand connected with the same</del><lb/>
<del>obnoxious act. It remains to be examined whether</del><lb/>
<del>any and what difference ought to be made in their</del><lb/>
<del>respective punishments.</del></p>
 
<head>Observations</head>
 
<p>It is common in most systems<lb/>
of Jurisprudence to speak of some one offender<lb/>
under the name of accessories or accomplices. <del>Correspondent</del><lb/>
<del>also to</del> this difference in point of name is<lb/>
<add>also commonly</add> <del>frequently no</del> attended by a correspondent difference in<lb/>
point of treatment; he who is <sic>stiled</sic> the principal being<lb/>
<del>commonly</del> <add>frequently</add> treated with more severity than the<lb/>
rest: <note>not to mention a number of differences in the method of Procedure.</note> In order to <add>judge of the propriety of these distinctions</add> <del>settle the above question</del> it will be<lb/>
necessary <del>therefore</del> to settle <add>in the first place what person</add> <del>what</del> the offender <del>is</del> who is commonly<lb/>
termed the principal, <add>is,</add> that is what relation his<lb/>
act bears to the rest of the acts attendant on the obnoxious<lb/>
event. <del>and then lastly to determine whether there be</del><lb/>
<del>any and what reason for distinguishing <add>in point of punishment</add> from the rest the offender</del><lb/>
<del>so designed.</del> <add>To p. 8. N<hi rend='superscript'>o</hi> 2.</add></p>





Revision as of 18:23, 14 February 2013

Click Here To Edit


---page break---

C 17

Of Co-offenders

1 guarding screening him in the first instance from detection, and
finally from punishment. In this stage the offence in
question co-incides with cri offences against Justice:
and may be committed in a variety of ways, such
as by harbouring the offender, maintaining him, concealing
him, furnishing him with assistance or information to enable him to elude detection or pursuit. defending him against the officers of Justice
rescuing him if already seized by them. already To p. 25. No 4

52

From p. 30 No 1 2 Reason for examining which the principal offender, if any ought to and who accomplicesbe stiled the principal, and which accomplices Thus much for the description of the several
sorts of offences that are are the acts of different
persons and may stand connected with the same
obnoxious act. It remains to be examined whether
any and what difference ought to be made in their
respective punishments.

Observations

It is common in most systems
of Jurisprudence to speak of some one offender
under the name of accessories or accomplices. Correspondent
also to this difference in point of name is
also commonly frequently no attended by a correspondent difference in
point of treatment; he who is stiled the principal being
commonly frequently treated with more severity than the
rest: not to mention a number of differences in the method of Procedure. In order to judge of the propriety of these distinctions settle the above question it will be
necessary therefore to settle in the first place what person what the offender is who is commonly
termed the principal, is, that is what relation his
act bears to the rest of the acts attendant on the obnoxious
event. and then lastly to determine whether there be
any and what reason for distinguishing in point of punishment from the rest the offender
so designed. To p. 8. No 2.




Identifier: | JB/098/025/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 98.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

21, 52

Box

098

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

025

Info in main headings field

of co-offenders

Image

003

Titles

observations

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f15 / f16 / f17 / f18

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[monogram] propatria [britannia with shield emblem]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31633

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in