★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>8.</head> | <head>8.</head> | ||
<head>RS VOLUMINOUSNESS - STILE.</head> | |||
<head>49. PLEONASM by <sic>ulteriority</sic><add>citeriority</add></head> | |||
<p>When two Acts <add> or existences </add> are <del> each </del> <add> so connected </add> that <del> one cannot be done without the other is done also </del> <add> the 2<hi rend='superscript'>nd</hi> cannot have been done but <add> that </add> the first must have</add> <lb/> been done also, and the Law means to pronounce the same concerning both, the <gap/> <lb/> need not be specified - as damage & destroy. In degrees of the same thing the <lb/> lower need not be specified together with the highers </p> | |||
<head>50. <foreign>VOCES Universalitates</foreign></head> | |||
<p> An expression of itself importing universality needs no words to strength<add>en</add> it - <lb/> Instance in the Predicament of time "That no person " --- "shall [at any <add> time</add> <del> he </del> <lb/> [hereafter] Will &c - The words in Brackets are superfluous --- Instance <lb/>in the Predicament of person - "The person of what condition soever he be </p> | |||
<head> <foreign>Epenthesis</foreign> <del><gap/></del> <add> 47</add> 51. <foreign>SUBJECTUM <unclear>most</unclear> dimissianem resumptium <add> io</add></foreign> v. 56</head> | |||
<p>A clause relative to the subject matter of several divisions, should be set down <lb/> apart from any of them - and for sake of Brevity not 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> repeated under every <add>ones</add> <lb/> <del> and </del> for the sake of Notoriety <add><del>method</del></add><add>Facility <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note> <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> Notoriety is concerned in the matter <unclear>yet</unclear> affects Notoriety, because a person who has occasion to consult <add> the collection </add> naturally expects the subject which concerns him concluded when the Work <add> <gap/> </add> breaks off from that & betakes itself to another: unless there be some detached passages which relate in a <unclear>concern</unclear> to both - here therefore is subject to overlook what is thus misplaced: <add> confounded & </add> which therefore <add> is to him </add> in <gap/> of notoriety, [is to him] as if it had never been <add> was not there at all. </add> </note> | |||
<add> observation</add>, not 2<hi rend='superscript'>dly</hi> Included under one only. - Instance, 2 <lb/> <add> 22@</add> 23. Car. 2<hi rend='superscript'>nd</hi>.25 In the 7 Sect. relating to offences in taking Fish is is a clause <lb/>not<del>ice</del> distinguished from the body of the Section by so much as a Semicolon, purporting <lb/>to <add> be </add> applicable to the <del>rest</del> <add> whole </add> of the Act which relates to <add> in <del>some</del> of it's other Sections</add> to Horses and Ponies - after this <lb/> sudden expansion, the context contracts itself as suddenly, and returns to Fish. <add> confines itself to the Article of </add> </p> | |||
<head>52. <foreign>SPECIFICATIONES de Maola <gap/>agindi</foreign> <lb/> Predicament of <foreign>Linbus Auxilias</foreign></head> | |||
<p><unclear>If</unclear> particular methods only of doing <add> accomplishing </add> an act are meant to be prohibited, here methods <lb/> must be enumerated, <add> specified</add> but if the act is meant to be prohibited by whatever means <unclear>in case </unclear> <lb/>it be none, that <add> such</add> specification is useless. . Example 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> J. 1. 27. 2. </p> | |||
<del><head>53. <gap/></head></del> | |||
<p><del> Expressions of laughter <gap/> and anger are superfluous - "None shall </del> presume to burn <lb/><del> any heath &c <gap/><gap/>? <gap/> " <foreign><gap/> ne soil su Lardi</foreign>" Stat. do. <gap/><gap/><gap/> " Stat. </del></p> | |||
<head><del>54. <foreign><gap/> quid</foreign> ?</del></head> | |||
<p><del> Rule against ambiguity. That the expression adopted may be <gap/><gap/><gap/> </del> <add><del><gap/> which</del> of what</add> <gap/> <add> what </add> <lb/> <del> it is meant to justify, 2<hi rend='superscript'>ndly</hi> if justify <add> <del><gap/><gap/></del></add> <gap/><gap/> </del> </p> | |||
<head>55</head> | |||
<p><note>55. No man <add> one or </add> shall &c - this form is well adapted to Brevity, but <sic>admitts</sic> not of a touch of modifications, so conveniently as the hypothetical form. It <sic>admitts</sic> of a <unclear>compradious</unclear> form for its <add> this </add> <unclear>correction</unclear> - as "on pain of ". <!-- symbol --> A Pronoun negative expression <add> agreeing </add> of the <add> with </add> subject of the publication governed by a verb in the future tense expressive of the action prohibited <foreign>Nulles Liber Homo <unclear>capicturval</unclear> Impersonatur &c</foreign>. This form </note> <lb/> has this disadvantage that it will not receive <add> <gap/> of </add> an express connection at all: <add> will not connect with it </add> The <unclear>agent</unclear> not being <add> brought </add> <lb/> into view cannot be pointed at him but by a circuitous transaction with the active form, & then <unclear>awkwardly</unclear> <lb/> & inexplictly - as by such <add>in so</add> <add> for example in such way as this </add> a way as this "on pain of so & so <add> imprisonment to </add> who shall of </p> | |||
<head>56.</head> | |||
<p> Another instance of <foreign>Epenthesis</foreign> is 2. G.2.25. The 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> Section relates to Forgery: the 2<hi rend='superscript'>nd</hi> <lb/> to Perjury. The 8<hi rend='superscript'>nd</hi> comes back to Forgery again. </p> | |||
<head>CONTOS. Redundances by citeriority. 49. By In [Lat]-clusion, 50, 52. Epenthesis Subjecti 51. <add> 56 </add> Enacting Forinulary. 53</head> <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | |||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
8. RS VOLUMINOUSNESS - STILE.
49. PLEONASM by ulteriorityciteriority
When two Acts or existences are each so connected that one cannot be done without the other is done also the 2nd cannot have been done but <add> that the first must have</add>
been done also, and the Law means to pronounce the same concerning both, the
need not be specified - as damage & destroy. In degrees of the same thing the
lower need not be specified together with the highers
50. VOCES Universalitates
An expression of itself importing universality needs no words to strengthen it -
Instance in the Predicament of time "That no person " --- "shall [at any time he
[hereafter] Will &c - The words in Brackets are superfluous --- Instance
in the Predicament of person - "The person of what condition soever he be
Epenthesis 47 51. SUBJECTUM most dimissianem resumptium io v. 56
A clause relative to the subject matter of several divisions, should be set down
apart from any of them - and for sake of Brevity not 1st repeated under every ones
and for the sake of Notoriety methodFacility + <note> + Notoriety is concerned in the matter yet affects Notoriety, because a person who has occasion to consult <add> the collection naturally expects the subject which concerns him concluded when the Work breaks off from that & betakes itself to another: unless there be some detached passages which relate in a concern to both - here therefore is subject to overlook what is thus misplaced: confounded & which therefore is to him in of notoriety, [is to him] as if it had never been was not there at all. </note>
observation, not 2dly Included under one only. - Instance, 2
22@ 23. Car. 2nd.25 In the 7 Sect. relating to offences in taking Fish is is a clause
notice distinguished from the body of the Section by so much as a Semicolon, purporting
to be applicable to the rest whole of the Act which relates to in some of it's other Sections to Horses and Ponies - after this
sudden expansion, the context contracts itself as suddenly, and returns to Fish. confines itself to the Article of
52. SPECIFICATIONES de Maola agindi
Predicament of Linbus Auxilias
If particular methods only of doing accomplishing an act are meant to be prohibited, here methods
must be enumerated, specified but if the act is meant to be prohibited by whatever means in case
it be none, that such specification is useless. . Example 1st J. 1. 27. 2.
53.
Expressions of laughter and anger are superfluous - "None shall presume to burn
any heath &c ? " ne soil su Lardi" Stat. do. " Stat.
54. quid ?
Rule against ambiguity. That the expression adopted may be which of what what
it is meant to justify, 2ndly if justify <add> </add>
55
55. No man one or shall &c - this form is well adapted to Brevity, but admitts not of a touch of modifications, so conveniently as the hypothetical form. It admitts of a compradious form for its this correction - as "on pain of ". A Pronoun negative expression agreeing of the with subject of the publication governed by a verb in the future tense expressive of the action prohibited Nulles Liber Homo capicturval Impersonatur &c. This form
has this disadvantage that it will not receive of an express connection at all: will not connect with it The agent not being brought
into view cannot be pointed at him but by a circuitous transaction with the active form, & then awkwardly
& inexplictly - as by such in so for example in such way as this a way as this "on pain of so & so imprisonment to who shall of
56.
Another instance of Epenthesis is 2. G.2.25. The 1st Section relates to Forgery: the 2nd
to Perjury. The 8nd comes back to Forgery again.
CONTOS. Redundances by citeriority. 49. By In [Lat]-clusion, 50, 52. Epenthesis Subjecti 51. 56 Enacting Forinulary. 53
|
Identifier: | JB/079/042/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 79. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
079 |
|||
|
042 |
compos. redudances by citeriority - by inclusion |
||
|
001 |
voluminousness |
||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c8 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::j honig & zoonen [lion with vryheyt motif]]] |
||
|
cc1 |
|||
|
25484 |
|||
