JB/079/046/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/079/046/002: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:


<p> <head>Hodge-Podge &#x2014; <hi rend='underline'>The more</hi> the less <lb/>clearable</head> <note>Notoriety (2) Dig. Hodge-Podge. Acts More difficult to clear away, the more complicated.</note>  
<p> <head>Hodge-Podge &#x2014; <hi rend='underline'>The more</hi> the less <lb/>clearable</head> <note>Notoriety (2) Dig. Hodge-Podge. Acts More difficult to clear away, the more complicated.</note>  
An unhappy circumstance attending this variety <lb/>is that <del>not </del> the greater it is, not only the greater <lb/>the <add>an</add> inconveniences of it while they subsist, but the<lb/> more difficult it becomes to remedy <add>them</add>: suppose<lb/> for example, a Statute relates to ten distinct <lb/>subject; concerning each of which there are various <lb/>provisions in other Acts &#x2014; <del>It</del> A <gap/> <lb/>Statute <del>passed</del> <add>of this <unclear>nature</unclear> made for</add> [relative to] one of these subjects, an <lb/>case the collection but of one tenth part of the<lb/> Act in question: nor can <del>it be discharged</del> <add>the <gap/> Book</add> of <lb/><del>the whole</del> <add>be partly rid of it</add> till the reduction of every one of<lb/> those <add>ten</add> subjects be <add>shall have</add> accomplished. &#x2014; Thus the <lb/>reduction <add>in performing the </add> <del>is performi</del> so much so much of one Act as relates<lb/> to the subject in question is repealed, &amp; so much <lb/>of another: <gap/> <del>often</del> <add>could</add> sometimes be difficult to<lb/> learn how much of them it is that does relate<lb/> to it; <add>because</add> what relates to one shall be blended with<lb/> what concerns another, and <del>then it is</del> <add>where they are</add> kept distinct,<lb/> there is <del>not any mode of designation more<lb/> precise:</del> <add>no method <add>means</add> of describing them<lb/> more precisely</add> for the Division into Sections is <del>not made</del> <add>the work of private</add> </p>  
An unhappy circumstance attending this variety <lb/>is that <del>not </del> the greater it is, not only the greater <lb/>the <add>an</add> inconveniences of it while they subsist, but the<lb/> more difficult it becomes to remedy <add>them</add>: suppose<lb/> for example, a Statute relates to ten distinct <lb/>subject; concerning each of which there are various <lb/>provisions in other Acts &#x2014; <del>It</del> A <gap/> <lb/>Statute <del>passed</del> <add>of this <unclear>nature</unclear> made for</add> [relative to] one of these subjects, an <lb/>case the collection but of one tenth part of the<lb/> Act in question: nor can <del>it be discharged</del> <add>the <gap/> Book</add> of <lb/><del>the whole</del> <add>be partly rid of it</add> till the reduction of every one of<lb/> those <add>ten</add> subjects be <add>shall have</add> accomplished. &#x2014; Thus the <lb/>reduction <add>in performing the </add> <del>is performi</del> so much of one Act as relates<lb/> to the subject in question is repealed, &amp; so much <lb/>of another: <gap/> <del>often</del> <add>could</add> sometimes be difficult to<lb/> learn how much of them it is that does relate<lb/> to it; <add>because</add> what relates to one shall be blended with<lb/> what concerns another, and <del>then it is</del> <add>where they are</add> kept distinct,<lb/> there is <del>not any mode of designation more<lb/> precise:</del> <add>no method <add>means</add> of describing them<lb/> more precisely</add> for the Division into Sections is <del>not made</del> <add>the work of private</add> </p>  
<pb/>
<pb/>


Line 18: Line 18:
<p><note>R.S. (3) Dig. Hodge-Podge Acts, make the existence <add>continuance</add> of an Act in Force, doubtful &#x2014; Example.</note>  A Statute is made: then comes another to explain <lb/>&amp; amend <del>it</del>, <add>&amp; continue it</add> &#x2014; then comes one more to explain<lb/> &amp; amend &amp; continue; <add>then comes a 4<hi rend='superscript'>th</hi> to amend</add> then comes <!-- omitting "of the" --> a 5<hi rend='superscript'>th</hi> <del>which</del> <add>to</add> <lb/>perpetuate the 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> taking <add>which mentions</add> <del>notice of the</del> 2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> &amp; 3<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> <lb/><del>but</del> <add>as <unclear>sopistrey</unclear></add> but takes no further notice of them. <lb/> are they perpetuated too? <add>where</add> If so, it is by implication. </p>
<p><note>R.S. (3) Dig. Hodge-Podge Acts, make the existence <add>continuance</add> of an Act in Force, doubtful &#x2014; Example.</note>  A Statute is made: then comes another to explain <lb/>&amp; amend <del>it</del>, <add>&amp; continue it</add> &#x2014; then comes one more to explain<lb/> &amp; amend &amp; continue; <add>then comes a 4<hi rend='superscript'>th</hi> to amend</add> then comes <!-- omitting "of the" --> a 5<hi rend='superscript'>th</hi> <del>which</del> <add>to</add> <lb/>perpetuate the 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> taking <add>which mentions</add> <del>notice of the</del> 2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> &amp; 3<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> <lb/><del>but</del> <add>as <unclear>sopistrey</unclear></add> but takes no further notice of them. <lb/> are they perpetuated too? <add>where</add> If so, it is by implication. </p>


 
<p>This is the case with the Act for the
 
better regulation<pb/> of <sic>Attornies</sic>
 
&amp; Solicitors, made
 
in 2.G.2<lb/> c.23.<add>for 9 years, patched up &amp;</add> 
 
<del>continued with</del> continued 
 
<del>again for their
 
<lb/>turn by</del> <add>in</add> 12.G.2.
 
c.13. <add>of the same rigor for the first time;</add> patched up
 
&amp; continued <lb/>
 
<del>by</del> <add>in</add> 22
 
<del>boo 2</del> 12.G.
 
2.c.13 <add>of the same rigor for the first time;</add> polished up
 
&amp; continued<lb/> <del>by</del> <add>in</add> 22 <del>boo 2</del> <add>of the same rigor c.<del>4.</del> <lb/> 
 
patched up again the next Session <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> 23.G.2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> 26.</note> for the 3<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> time, <lb/>time, &amp; at last <del>made perpetual</del> by the<lb/> 75<hi rend='superscript'>th</hi> Section of a revenue Act in the
 





Revision as of 20:20, 29 September 2012

Click Here To Edit

II. — Podge ( strung upon long
Acts.

The shortness of a number of sections taken separately might be supposed to be the reason for stringing them together; as if the notion was, that a Statute ought to be of a certain size — But this is not It might be supposed, that this variety was occasioned
by the stringing of several a few short Sections
to as make-weights, to make up together
a bundle of a decent size: but this it is no such
thing — The Act 3. G. 2. 19. ia a
Acts
for 74 Sections of it is a Revenue Act; then comes a two acts
75th for perpetuating an Act for the Regulation
of Attornies; and two more containing
certain provisions of Indemnity.

1 Dig. Hodge-Podge Acts wantonly made Instances That the Legislator like the Giant Polypheme,
might have
Reeds of decent growth
To make a Pipe for his capacious mouth.

Compas.


---page break---

Hodge-Podge — The more the less
clearable
Notoriety (2) Dig. Hodge-Podge. Acts More difficult to clear away, the more complicated. An unhappy circumstance attending this variety
is that not the greater it is, not only the greater
the an inconveniences of it while they subsist, but the
more difficult it becomes to remedy them: suppose
for example, a Statute relates to ten distinct
subject; concerning each of which there are various
provisions in other Acts — It A
Statute passed of this nature made for [relative to] one of these subjects, an
case the collection but of one tenth part of the
Act in question: nor can it be discharged the Book of
the whole be partly rid of it till the reduction of every one of
those ten subjects be shall have accomplished. — Thus the
reduction in performing the is performi so much of one Act as relates
to the subject in question is repealed, & so much
of another: often could sometimes be difficult to
learn how much of them it is that does relate
to it; because what relates to one shall be blended with
what concerns another, and then it is where they are kept distinct,
there is not any mode of designation more
precise:
no method <add>means of describing them
more precisely</add> for the Division into Sections is not made the work of private


---page break---

Volume Orig. Perpetuat. Sans Amendg

R.S. (3) Dig. Hodge-Podge Acts, make the existence continuance of an Act in Force, doubtful — Example. A Statute is made: then comes another to explain
& amend it, & continue it — then comes one more to explain
& amend & continue; then comes a 4th to amend then comes a 5th which to
perpetuate the 1st taking which mentions notice of the 2d & 3d
but as sopistrey but takes no further notice of them.
are they perpetuated too? where If so, it is by implication.

This is the case with the Act for the better regulation
---page break---
of Attornies & Solicitors, made in 2.G.2
c.23.for 9 years, patched up & continued with continued again for their
turn by
in 12.G.2. c.13. of the same rigor for the first time; patched up & continued
by in 22 boo 2 12.G. 2.c.13 of the same rigor for the first time; polished up & continued
by in 22 boo 2 <add>of the same rigor c.4.
patched up again the next Session + + 23.G.2d 26. for the 3d time,
time, & at last made perpetual by the
75th Section of a revenue Act in the

Identifier: | JB/079/046/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 79.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

079

Main Headings

law in general

Folio number

046

Info in main headings field

happiness and unhappiness - their ingredients

Image

002

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f6 / / / f9

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

25488

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in