★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<head>23 July 1802 <lb/>N. S. Wales <lb/> 5</head> | <head>23 July 1802 <lb/>N. S. Wales <lb/> 5</head> | ||
<p>Of the non-existence of any adjudication bearing <lb/>directly upon the <del>pers</del> <add>question of the supposed</add> legislative power of the Crown over<lb/> Colonies, there can not be a more convincing <add>a more perfectly convincing <add>conclusive</add> proof <del>t</del> could not be wished for,</add> proof than <lb/>what is afforded by the use made <del>of</del> in <add>all</add> the argument <lb/>of Laterus' case, and the pains taken to extract <del>the</del> one <lb/>of the few drops of sense out of the ocean <add><gap/></add> of absurdity and <unclear>unreason</unclear> re<lb/> of which Lord Coke's Report of that case is composed. <lb/>This was from the 7<hi rend='superscript'>th</hi> Volume <!-- space --> the term the <!-- space --> of James <lb/>1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi>. Going back <del>to</del> <add>no</add> further than <del>the 8<hi rend='superscript'>th</hi></del> <add>two</add> Volumes <del>of the<lb/> same</del> and <!-- blank --> years, they might have found <hi rend='underline'> | <p>Of the non-existence of any adjudication bearing <lb/>directly upon the <del>pers</del> <add>question of the supposed</add> legislative power of the Crown over<lb/> Colonies, there can not be a more convincing <add>a more perfectly convincing <add>conclusive</add> proof <del>t</del> could not be wished for,</add> proof than <lb/>what is afforded by the use made <del>of</del> in <add>all</add> the argument <lb/>of Laterus' case, and the pains taken to extract <del>the</del> one <lb/>of the few drops of sense out of the ocean <add><gap/></add> of absurdity and <unclear>unreason</unclear> re<lb/> of which Lord Coke's Report of that case is composed. <lb/>This was from the 7<hi rend='superscript'>th</hi> Volume <!-- space --> the term the <!-- space --> of James <lb/>1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi>. Going back <del>to</del> <add>no</add> further than <del>the 8<hi rend='superscript'>th</hi></del> <add>two</add> Volumes <del>of the<lb/> same</del> and <!-- blank --> years, they might have found <hi rend='underline'>Clarks</hi> <add>the "Alban's</add><lb/> case above mentioned a case which though it certainly<lb/> does not apply so directly to Colonies obtained by conquest<lb/> as to Colonies obtained without conquest, might <lb/>have <del>for</del> afforded matter <add>not</add> unworthy <add>of</add> consideration with reference<lb/> to any sort of Colonies.</p> | ||
23 July 1802
N. S. Wales
5
Of the non-existence of any adjudication bearing
directly upon the pers question of the supposed legislative power of the Crown over
Colonies, there can not be a more convincing a more perfectly convincing <add>conclusive proof t could not be wished for,</add> proof than
what is afforded by the use made of in all the argument
of Laterus' case, and the pains taken to extract the one
of the few drops of sense out of the ocean of absurdity and unreason re
of which Lord Coke's Report of that case is composed.
This was from the 7th Volume the term the of James
1st. Going back to no further than the 8th two Volumes of the
same and years, they might have found Clarks the "Alban's
case above mentioned a case which though it certainly
does not apply so directly to Colonies obtained by conquest
as to Colonies obtained without conquest, might
have for afforded matter not unworthy of consideration with reference
to any sort of Colonies.
|
Identifier: | JB/116/139/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1802-07-24 |
1-3 |
||
|
116 |
panopticon versus new south wales |
||
|
139 |
n. s. wales |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e5 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
37672 |
|||
