JB/115/151/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/115/151/001: Difference between revisions

Petergh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Petergh (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
<head><del>Constitutional <unclear>Code</unclear></del></head>
<head><del>Constitutional <unclear>Code</unclear></del></head>


<p><unclear>Horses the</unclear> <gap/> <gap/> the <gap/> <unclear>of the</unclear> <gap/></p>


<p>Of <add>In</add> the whole field of legislation <add>of <gap/> and <gap/></add> the <unclear>number</unclear> of the <gap/><lb/>
in question seem to <unclear>have been confin'd</unclear> to the one <gap/>: <unclear>in</unclear> <add>by</add> <del>the <gap/></del><lb/>
<unclear>thus regard</unclear> for <unclear>they are object</unclear> all <unclear>other regard</unclear>  seem <unclear>to have been</unclear><lb/>
swallowed up. <del><gap/></del></p>


 
<p>One <unclear>may after</unclear> <add>In the case of <del><gap/> <gap/></del> <gap/> in <unclear>any other</unclear> <gap/></add> <unclear>name what is the</unclear> qualities of <gap/> <gap/><lb/>
 
<gap/> by <del><unclear>the</unclear></del> it would <unclear>have been</unclear> the first question: what the<lb/>
absolute quality <unclear>that</unclear> the <gap/> <add><gap/></add> quality compared with that <unclear>first</unclear><lb/>
<gap/> <unclear>other</unclear> <gap/> <gap/>: the <gap/> <gap/> <unclear>this</unclear> would<lb/>
<gap/> <unclear>even</unclear>  the question <unclear>relative be punishment</unclear> the <unclear>question relative</unclear> <add><unclear>or to</unclear></add><lb/>
the <unclear>expence</unclear> which <unclear>is</unclear> <unclear><add>is <del>all</del></unclear> <gap/> </add> <del>the <gap/> of <unclear>punishment and so to</unclear> <gap/></del> <lb/>
<del>of the instruments <gap/> in the</del> it <unclear>would be written that</unclear> <gap/> <gap/><lb/>
<unclear>not for</unclear> the <gap/> of <gap/> it: the <gap/> in all <gap/> <unclear>is</unclear><lb/>
the <gap/> of punishment and in the <gap/> of such instruments as<lb/>
would <unclear>be to be</unclear> constructed <add><unclear>framed</unclear></add> for the <unclear>inflection</unclear> of it.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 14:26, 20 December 2012

Click Here To Edit

1823. August 31 Constitutional Code

Horses the the of the

Of In the whole field of legislation of and the number of the
in question seem to have been confin'd to the one : in by the
thus regard for they are object all other regard seem to have been
swallowed up.

One may after In the case of in any other name what is the qualities of
by the it would have been the first question: what the
absolute quality that the quality compared with that first
other : the this would
even the question relative be punishment the question relative or to
the expence which is <add>is all </add> the of punishment and so to
of the instruments in the it would be written that
not for the of it: the in all is
the of punishment and in the of such instruments as
would be to be constructed framed for the inflection of it.



Identifier: | JB/115/151/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 115.

Date_1

1823-08-31

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

115

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

151

Info in main headings field

on penitentiary - for place

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e6

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1822

Marginals

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1822

Notes public

ID Number

37526

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in