★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<p>N<hi rend='superscript'>o</hi> 7. p.268. 19<hi rend='superscript'>th</hi> February 1792. <hi rend='underline'>Intention executed</hi>. <lb/> On this day sailed for Canton, the <gap/>. Into this<lb/> ship had been received six persons from the Settlement: <lb/>two of them, <hi rend='underline'>Expirees</hi>, <hi rend='underline'>by</hi> permission; two others, <hi rend='underline'>Expirees</hi> <lb/>also, but <hi rend='underline'>without</hi> permission: the remaining two, <hi rend='underline'>Non-Expirees</hi>. <lb/>The four <del>^</del> latter <del>were stated as having</del> <add>it is stated that they had</add> been <lb/><del>it</del> "secreted?: also that they were "discovered"; "the <gap/> <lb/>"being <gap/>." <del>Though</del> Thus they were accordingly <lb/>re-landed at least, if not otherwise punished, may be <add>pretty safely</add> <lb/>concluded, though not expressly mentioned. </p> | <p>N<hi rend='superscript'>o</hi> 7. p.268. 19<hi rend='superscript'>th</hi> February 1792. <hi rend='underline'>Intention executed</hi>. <lb/> On this day sailed for Canton, the <gap/>. Into this<lb/> ship had been received six persons from the Settlement: <lb/>two of them, <hi rend='underline'>Expirees</hi>, <hi rend='underline'>by</hi> permission; two others, <hi rend='underline'>Expirees</hi> <lb/>also, but <hi rend='underline'>without</hi> permission: the remaining two, <hi rend='underline'>Non-Expirees</hi>. <lb/>The four <del>^</del> latter <del>were stated as having</del> <add>it is stated that they had</add> been <lb/><del>it</del> "secreted?: also that they were "discovered"; "the <gap/> <lb/>"being <gap/>." <del>Though</del> Thus they were accordingly <lb/>re-landed at least, if not otherwise punished, may be <add>pretty safely</add> <lb/>concluded, though not expressly mentioned. </p> | ||
<p>Of the two <hi rend='underline'>Non-expirees</hi> <del>,</del> it is stated, that "they had<lb/> "not yet served the <hi rend='underline'>full</hi> period of their sentences. From <lb/>this it seems not unreasonable to conclude that <del>they <lb/>would have</del> their full period would have arrived,<lb/> before their arrival in Great Britain. If so <del>their</del> <add>neither <unclear>then</unclear> by their</add> arrival, <lb/><del>as with is</del> <add>any more than by</add> their departure would <del>have been <gap/> thing</del> <add>they <gap/> gone</add> beyond the exercise of their (restored rights. </p> | |||
18 Jany 1803 +
(6
No 7. p.268. 19th February 1792. Intention executed.
On this day sailed for Canton, the . Into this
ship had been received six persons from the Settlement:
two of them, Expirees, by permission; two others, Expirees
also, but without permission: the remaining two, Non-Expirees.
The four ^ latter were stated as having it is stated that they had been
it "secreted?: also that they were "discovered"; "the
"being ." Though Thus they were accordingly
re-landed at least, if not otherwise punished, may be pretty safely
concluded, though not expressly mentioned.
Of the two Non-expirees , it is stated, that "they had
"not yet served the full period of their sentences. From
this it seems not unreasonable to conclude that they
would have their full period would have arrived,
before their arrival in Great Britain. If so their neither then by their arrival,
as with is any more than by their departure would have been thing they gone beyond the exercise of their (restored rights.
|
Identifier: | JB/116/364/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1803-01-18 |
|||
|
116 |
panopticon versus new south wales |
||
|
364 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e6 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
1800 |
||
|
1800 |
|||
|
37897 |
|||
