★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
<p>N<hi rend='superscript'>o</hi> 9. p.268 15 February <del>1798</del>. 1793. At this time<lb/> the expectation "about the clause." . . in the Charter <lb/>"party, for preventing Shipmasters from receiving any<lb/> "person. . . from the Colony without the express consent<lb/> "and order of the Governor," was found to be realized. The<lb/> Beltona came provided with this Clause. She had sailed <lb/>from England on the 8<hi rend='superscript'>th</hi> of August 1792.</p> | <p>N<hi rend='superscript'>o</hi> 9. p.268 15 February <del>1798</del>. 1793. At this time<lb/> the expectation "about the clause." . . in the Charter <lb/>"party, for preventing Shipmasters from receiving any<lb/> "person. . . from the Colony without the express consent<lb/> "and order of the Governor," was found to be realized. The<lb/> Beltona came provided with this Clause. She had sailed <lb/>from England on the 8<hi rend='superscript'>th</hi> of August 1792.</p> | ||
<p>N<hi rend='superscript'>o</hi> 9 <del>24</del> p. 283. 24<hi rend='superscript'>th</hi> April 1793. <hi rend='underline'>Intention executed<lb/> a second time.</hi> <add>Sailed the <sic>Shah</sic> Hormurias and Chesterfield.</add> But few Convicts [Expirees] were<lb/> "<hi rend='underline'>allowed</hi> to quit the Colony in these ships. <del>[the]<lb/> The ships were two.</del> On <del>another</del> <add>a subsequent</add> occasion in November 1794, <lb/>the number received on board <del>two</del> <add>the same number of</add> ships <del>subj</del> (the Endeavour<lb/> and the Fancy) had been <hi rend='underline'>near</hi> a hundred: whereof <lb/>by permission, 50; without permission near 50 more.<lb/> ib., p. 398. </p> | |||
18 Jany 1803 +
(6
No 7. p.268. 19th February 1792. Intention executed.
On this day sailed for Canton, the . Into this
ship had been received six persons from the Settlement:
two of them, Expirees, by permission; two others, Expirees
also, but without permission: the remaining two, Non-Expirees.
The four ^ latter were stated as having it is stated that they had been
it "secreted": also that they were "discovered"; "the ship
"being ." Though Thus they were accordingly
re-landed at least, if not otherwise punished, may be pretty safely
concluded, though not expressly mentioned.
Of the two Non-expirees , it is stated, that "they had
"not yet served the full period of their sentences. From
this it seems not unreasonable to conclude that they
would have their full period would have arrived,
before their arrival in Great Britain. If so their neither then by their arrival,
as with is any more than by their departure would have been thing they gone beyond the exercise of their (restored rights.
No 9. p.268 15 February 1798. 1793. At this time
the expectation "about the clause." . . in the Charter
"party, for preventing Shipmasters from receiving any
"person. . . from the Colony without the express consent
"and order of the Governor," was found to be realized. The
Beltona came provided with this Clause. She had sailed
from England on the 8th of August 1792.
No 9 24 p. 283. 24th April 1793. Intention executed
a second time. Sailed the Shah Hormurias and Chesterfield. But few Convicts [Expirees] were
"allowed to quit the Colony in these ships. [the]
The ships were two. On another a subsequent occasion in November 1794,
the number received on board two the same number of ships subj (the Endeavour
and the Fancy) had been near a hundred: whereof
by permission, 50; without permission near 50 more.
ib., p. 398.
|
Identifier: | JB/116/364/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1803-01-18 |
|||
|
116 |
panopticon versus new south wales |
||
|
364 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e6 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
1800 |
||
|
1800 |
|||
|
37897 |
|||
