★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
<lb/><p>In a word to <unclear>commons</unclear> an illustration from Nature<lb/> <unclear>Philosophy</unclear> [a natural way]. A Decision<lb/> founded on a Statute is a ray of light if using<lb/> from the Statute as its <hi rend='superscript'><gap/></hi>Radiant. A Decision<lb/> founded when Common Law is a way of using<lb/> an <gap/><gap/><hi rend='superscript'><gap/></hi><gap/>, which <hi rend='superscript'>are very<gap/></hi> <gap/>its false Radi-<lb/>ant. </p> | <lb/><p>In a word to <unclear>commons</unclear> an illustration from Nature<lb/> <unclear>Philosophy</unclear> [a natural way]. A Decision<lb/> founded on a Statute is a ray of light if using<lb/> from the Statute as its <hi rend='superscript'><gap/></hi>Radiant. A Decision<lb/> founded when Common Law is a way of using<lb/> an <gap/><gap/><hi rend='superscript'><gap/></hi><gap/>, which <hi rend='superscript'>are very<gap/></hi> <gap/>its false Radi-<lb/>ant. </p> | ||
<pb/> | <pb/> | ||
A decision grounded when a statute always de-<lb/> claims that the fact in question is <del><gap></del> <hi rend='superscript'>an individual</hi><lb/> of that <del><gap/></del><hi rend='superscript'> <unclear>thinks</unclear></hi> of facts <hi rend='superscript'>as one thinks of <gap/> <gap/> of <gap/> </hi>on which the <hi rend='superscript'><gap/>superscript text is of <gap/></hi> <unclear>thoughts</unclear><lb/> <hi rend='superscript'>-knownst</hi> of the <gap/> <gap/> it <gap/> <gap/> of a <gap/><lb/> hand <del><gap/> decision <hi rend='superscript'><gap> <gap> of <gap> thoughts</hi><gap> made <gap> <gap> a</del><pb> <del><gap><del>— The specific rule <gap><lb/> [or rather the <gap>, to I think with <gap> <gap>—<lb/> with his life <unclear>precision</unclear>] that is the proposition<lb/> producing these two <unclear>specific</unclear> <gap> one <del>of <gap> or</del><lb/> <del><gap</del> as <gap> <unclear>from</unclear> the other with it</lb> has been formed by the <gap> authority, <unclear>clothed</unclear><lb/> in certain language, and that language<lb/> fixed by certain <unclear>permanent</unclear> natural <unclear>works</unclear>, then <gap> upon a <hi rend='superscript'><gap></hi><unclear>permanent</unclear> <hi rend='superscript'>natural</hi> <gap>, the</lb> <gap>— in a word it is a written Law.</lb> When this decision is grounded upon the Common</lb> Law that is upon <gap> decisions, no <unclear>words</unclear><lb/> <gap> <gap>. <del><gap> is <gap> <gap> <hi rend='superscript'><del><gap</del></hi> of <gap><gap></del>—</lb> <del><gap></del>. The decision is <hi rend='underline'><unclear>"guard"</unclear></hi> from such</lb> a rule— <hi rend='superscript'><del><unclear>No such</unclear> <gap> <unclear>for there</unclear> <gap></del></hi><del><gap> rule is <gap> which is a</del> </lb> No such rule can exist because <gap> is <gap></lb> then the idea <unclear>compounded</unclear> in [that <gap> of] this</lb> decision. Every decision is <unclear>handwritten</unclear>; <gap></lb> -ded upon the particular fact which <gap></lb> for it. This natural rule, is a rule which</lb> <note>LAW Common X Statute.</note> is <unclear>happened</unclear>, a <unclear>figment</unclear> of the imagination, < | A decision grounded when a statute always de-<lb/> claims that the fact in question is <del><gap></del> <hi rend='superscript'>an individual</hi><lb/> of that <del><gap/></del><hi rend='superscript'> <unclear>thinks</unclear></hi> of facts <hi rend='superscript'>as one thinks of <gap/> <gap/> of <gap/> </hi>on which the <hi rend='superscript'><gap/>superscript text is of <gap/></hi> <unclear>thoughts</unclear><lb/> <hi rend='superscript'>-knownst</hi> of the <gap/> <gap/> it <gap/> <gap/> of a <gap/><lb/> hand <del><gap/> decision <hi rend='superscript'><gap> <gap> of <gap> thoughts</hi><gap> made <gap> <gap> a</del><pb> <del><gap><del>— The specific rule <gap><lb/> [or rather the <gap>, to I think with <gap> <gap>—<lb/> with his life <unclear>precision</unclear>] that is the proposition<lb/> producing these two <unclear>specific</unclear> <gap> one <del>of <gap> or</del><lb/> <del><gap</del> as <gap> <unclear>from</unclear> the other with it</lb> has been formed by the <gap> authority, <unclear>clothed</unclear><lb/> in certain language, and that language<lb/> fixed by certain <unclear>permanent</unclear> natural <unclear>works</unclear>, then <gap> upon a <hi rend='superscript'><gap></hi><unclear>permanent</unclear> <hi rend='superscript'>natural</hi> <gap>, the</lb> <gap>— in a word it is a written Law.</lb> When this decision is grounded upon the Common</lb> Law that is upon <gap> decisions, no <unclear>words</unclear><lb/> <gap> <gap>. <del><gap> is <gap> <gap> <hi rend='superscript'><del><gap</del></hi> of <gap><gap></del>—</lb> <del><gap></del>. The decision is <hi rend='underline'><unclear>"guard"</unclear></hi> from such</lb> a rule— <hi rend='superscript'><del><unclear>No such</unclear> <gap> <unclear>for there</unclear> <gap></del></hi><del><gap> rule is <gap> which is a</del> </lb> No such rule can exist because <gap> is <gap></lb> then the idea <unclear>compounded</unclear> in [that <gap> of] this</lb> decision. Every decision is <unclear>handwritten</unclear>; <gap></lb> -ded upon the particular fact which <gap></lb> for it. This natural rule, is a rule which</lb> <note>LAW Common X Statute.</note> is <unclear>happened</unclear>, a <unclear>figment</unclear> of the imagination, <gap></lb> by <gap>, on the one hand from <del>the</del><hi rend='superscript'>a <gap></hi></lb> particular fact <gap> this from a particular</lb> <gap> <gap> with it, in this manner <gap></lb> have mastered. | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | ||
Click Here To Edit LAW & COMMON STATUTE —Decisions all particular. No General Rule Exists
In a word to commons an illustration from Nature
Philosophy [a natural way]. A Decision
founded on a Statute is a ray of light if using
from the Statute as its Radiant. A Decision
founded when Common Law is a way of using
an , which are very its false Radi-
ant.
---page break---
A decision grounded when a statute always de-
claims that the fact in question is <gap> an individual
of that thinks of facts as one thinks of of on which the superscript text is of thoughts
-knownst of the it of a
hand decision <gap> <gap> of <gap> thoughts<gap> made <gap> <gap> a<pb> <gap>— The specific rule <gap>
[or rather the <gap>, to I think with <gap> <gap>—
with his life precision] that is the proposition
producing these two specific <gap> one of <gap> or
<gap as <gap> from the other with it</lb> has been formed by the <gap> authority, clothed
in certain language, and that language
fixed by certain permanent natural works, then <gap> upon a <gap>permanent natural <gap>, the</lb> <gap>— in a word it is a written Law.</lb> When this decision is grounded upon the Common</lb> Law that is upon <gap> decisions, no words
<gap> <gap>. <gap> is <gap> <gap> <hi rend='superscript'><gap</hi> of <gap><gap>—</lb> <gap>. The decision is "guard" from such</lb> a rule— No such <gap> for there <gap><gap> rule is <gap> which is a </lb> No such rule can exist because <gap> is <gap></lb> then the idea compounded in [that <gap> of] this</lb> decision. Every decision is handwritten; <gap></lb> -ded upon the particular fact which <gap></lb> for it. This natural rule, is a rule which</lb> LAW Common X Statute. is happened, a figment of the imagination, <gap></lb> by <gap>, on the one hand from thea <gap></lb> particular fact <gap> this from a particular</lb> <gap> <gap> with it, in this manner <gap></lb> have mastered.
|
Identifier: | JB/050/073/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 50. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
050 |
procedure code |
||
|
073 |
law common & statute - decisions all particular - no general rule exists |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::gr [crown motif]]] |
||
|
16064 |
|||
